agentleFS
AWSKnown publisheraws/tools-for-devops-agent/skills/launchdarkly-tools/SKILL.md

launchdarkly-tools

Skill141 starsChanged 8 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Give your agents capabilities through tools (function calling). Helps you identify what your agent needs to do, create tool definitions, and attach them to config variations.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check what exists in the codebase (API clients, functions)

    line 44
  2. Distinctive:

    Consider framework: LangGraph/LangChain auto-generate schemas.

    line 45
  3. Distinctive:

    If the user asks to check existing tools first, or you have no codebase context about what tools exist, follow this exact order:

    line 47
  4. Very specific:

    Call get-ai-tools as your first tool call before any creation.

    line 53
  5. Very specific:

    If you observe a UI-clear bug where attaching tools wipes other fields, do not work around it by re-sending those fields from the previous …

    line 90
  6. Very specific:

    Use get-ai-tools with the toolKey to confirm the tool exists with a valid schema

    line 94
  7. Very specific:

    Use get-agent-configs with the configKey to confirm the tool is attached to the variation (check tools in the variation's output)

    line 95
  8. Very specific:

    Track every tool invocation: Call tracker.track_tool_call(tool_name) / tracker.trackToolCall(toolName) for each tool the agent actually …

    line 178
  9. Distinctive:

    Don't try to attach tools during config creation -- update the variation afterward

    line 232
  10. Distinctive:

    Don't skip clear tool descriptions (LLM needs them to decide when to call)

    line 233
  11. Distinctive:

    Don't forget to verify attachment after updating the variation

    line 234
  12. Very specific:

    Don't bundle instructions, messages, model, or parameters into the tool-attachment PATCH.

    line 235

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Config Tools

You're using a skill that will guide you through adding capabilities to your agents through tools (function calling). Your job is to identify what your agent needs to do, create tool definitions, attach them to variations, and verify they work.

Prerequisites

This skill requires the remotely hosted LaunchDarkly MCP server to be configured in your environment.

Required MCP tools:

  • create-ai-tool -- create a new tool definition with a schema
  • update-agent-config with resource: "variation" -- attach tools to a config variation
  • get-agent-configs with configKey -- verify tools are attached to the variation

Optional MCP tools:

  • get-ai-tools -- browse existing tools in the project; with toolKey, inspect one tool's schema

Core Principles

  1. Start with Capabilities: Think about what your agent needs to do before creating tools
  2. Framework Matters: LangGraph/CrewAI often auto-generate schemas; OpenAI SDK needs manual schemas
  3. Create Before Attach: Tools must exist before you can attach them to variations
  4. Verify: The agent fetches the config to confirm attachment
  5. Complete the Full Workflow: Listing existing tools is a discovery step, not the end goal. After listing, always proceed to create the requested tool, attach it, and verify. Do not stop after exploration.

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Needed Capabilities

What should the agent be able to do?

  • Query databases, call APIs, perform calculations, send notifications
  • Check what exists in the codebase (API clients, functions)
  • Consider framework: LangGraph/LangChain auto-generate schemas; direct SDK needs manual schemas

If the user asks to check existing tools first, or you have no codebase context about what tools exist, follow this exact order:

  1. get-ai-tools -- explore what exists
  2. create-ai-tool -- create the new tool (with a key different from existing ones)
  3. update-agent-config with resource: "variation" -- attach it
  4. get-agent-configs -- verify

Call get-ai-tools as your first tool call before any creation. Never stop after listing alone -- always proceed through all four steps.

Step 2: Create Tools

Use create-ai-tool with:

  • key -- unique identifier for the tool
  • description -- clear description (the LLM uses this to decide when to call the tool)
  • schema -- raw JSON Schema (do NOT use the OpenAI function calling wrapper):
{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "query": {"type": "string", "description": "Search query"},
    "limit": {"type": "integer", "default": 10}
  },
  "required": ["query"]
}

Step 3: Attach to Variation

Use update-agent-config with resource: "variation" to attach tools. Pass only the tools field (plus projectKey, configKey, resource, variationKey, and confirm). Do not bundle instructions, messages, model, or parameters into this PATCH unless the user has explicitly asked you to also update those fields. Those fields may have been edited in the LaunchDarkly UI since the variation was created, and including them in a tool-attachment PATCH will silently clobber the UI edits.

{
  "projectKey": "my-project",
  "configKey": "support-chatbot",
  "resource": "variation",
  "variationKey": "default",
  "tools": [
    {"key": "search-knowledge-base", "version": 1}
  ],
  "confirm": true
}

If you observe a UI-clear bug where attaching tools wipes other fields, do not work around it by re-sending those fields from the previous get-agent-configs response — that masks the bug and can resurrect stale values that the user has since edited. Report the bug instead.

Step 4: Verify

  1. Use get-ai-tools with the toolKey to confirm the tool exists with a valid schema
  2. Use get-agent-configs with the configKey to confirm the tool is attached to the variation (check tools in the variation's output)

Report results:

  • Tool created with valid schema
  • Tool attached to variation
  • Flag any issues

Per-provider schema at the call site

LaunchDarkly stores the tool schema once — the JSON Schema you passed as schema to create-ai-tool, with the tool's key and description. Your application reads it back via config.model.parameters.tools (completion mode) or agent_config.model.parameters.tools (agent mode), then converts to the shape the provider SDK expects. LaunchDarkly never makes the provider call; your code does. The handlers that implement each tool also stay in application code — LaunchDarkly stores the schema, your application owns the behavior.

Provider / frameworkTarget shapeWhere it goes on the call
OpenAI Chat Completions (direct SDK){type: "function", function: {name, description, parameters}}top-level tools=[...]
Anthropic direct SDK{name, description, input_schema} — rename parameters → input_schematop-level tools=[...]
Bedrock Converse{toolSpec: {name, description, inputSchema: {json: parameters}}}inside toolConfig.tools=[...]
Gemini (google-genai){function_declarations: [{name, description, parameters}]} (Python) / {functionDeclarations: [...]} (Node)GenerateContentConfig.tools=[...]
OpenAI Responses APILaunchDarkly's flat shape passes through unchangedtop-level tools=[...]
LangChain / LangGraphcreateLangChainModel(config) (Node) / create_langchain_model(config) (Python) and pass ai_config.tools (or your own StructuredTool list) into bind_tools(...) / create_react_agent(tools=[...])framework-native; no per-call conversion
Strands AgentsLaunchDarkly's flat shape; drop parameters.tools before passing params to the Strands model class (AnthropicModel, OpenAIModel) — Python @tool-decorated callables stay in codeAgent(tools=[...]) constructor; no per-call conversion

Minimal conversion snippets (Python):

ld_tools = (ai_config.model.to_dict().get("parameters") or {}).get("tools", []) or []

# OpenAI Chat Completions
openai_tools = [
    {
        "type": "function",
        "function": {
            "name": t["name"],
            "description": t.get("description", ""),
            "parameters": t.get("parameters", {"type": "object", "properties": {}}),
        },
    }
    for t in ld_tools
]

# Anthropic
anthropic_tools = [
    {
        "name": t["name"],
        "description": t.get("description", ""),
        "input_schema": t.get("parameters", {"type": "object", "properties": {}}),
    }
    for t in ld_tools
]

# Bedrock Converse
bedrock_tool_config = {
    "tools": [
        {
            "toolSpec": {
                "name": t["name"],
                "description": t.get("description", ""),
                "inputSchema": {"json": t.get("parameters", {"type": "object", "properties": {}})},
            }
        }
        for t in ld_tools
    ]
}

# Gemini
gemini_tools = [
    {
        "function_declarations": [
            {
                "name": t["name"],
                "description": t.get("description", ""),
                "parameters": t.get("parameters", {"type": "object", "properties": {}}),
            }
            for t in ld_tools
        ]
    }
] if ld_tools else []

Agent loop with tool calls

An agent that uses tools runs a short loop: call the provider, dispatch any tool calls, loop again, stop when the provider returns a final answer. Three rules apply regardless of provider:

  1. Bound the loop. MAX_STEPS = 5 is a safe default. A runaway tool loop is almost always a prompt or schema bug, not a case that needs 50 iterations.
  2. Track every tool invocation. Call tracker.track_tool_call(tool_name) / tracker.trackToolCall(toolName) for each tool the agent actually executes. This is what the Monitoring tab counts as tool usage.
  3. Break on the provider's "no more tool calls" signal. The exact signal differs per provider: OpenAI Chat Completions → choice.finish_reason != "tool_calls"; Anthropic → response.stop_reason != "tool_use"; Bedrock Converse → response["stopReason"] != "tool_use"; Gemini → response.function_calls empty; OpenAI Responses API → no function_call items in response.output.

Skeleton (Python, Anthropic — the other providers follow the same shape with their own stop-reason check and tool-result formatting):

messages = [{"role": "user", "content": initial_input}]
MAX_STEPS = 5
for _ in range(MAX_STEPS):
    response = tracker.track_metrics_of(
        anthropic_metrics,
        lambda: anthropic_client.messages.create(
            model=agent.model.name,
            system=agent.instructions,
            messages=messages,
            tools=anthropic_tools,
            **params,
        ),
    )
    if response.stop_reason != "tool_use":
        break

    messages.append({"role": "assistant", "content": response.content})

    tool_results = []
    for block in response.content:
        if block.type != "tool_use":
            continue
        if block.name not in tool_handlers:
            raise ValueError(f"Unknown tool: {block.name}")
        result = tool_handlers[block.name](**block.input)
        tracker.track_tool_call(block.name)
        tool_results.append({
            "type": "tool_result",
            "tool_use_id": block.id,
            "content": result,
        })
    messages.append({"role": "user", "content": tool_results})

Orchestrator Note

LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen often generate schemas from function definitions. You still need to create tools in LaunchDarkly and attach keys to variations so the SDK knows what's available.

Edge Cases

SituationAction
Tool already exists (409)Use existing or create with different key
Schema invalidUse raw JSON Schema format (type: object, properties, required)
Wrong endpoint assumedThe tools use /ai-tools, not /ai-configs/tools

What NOT to Do

  • Don't try to attach tools during config creation -- update the variation afterward
  • Don't skip clear tool descriptions (LLM needs them to decide when to call)
  • Don't forget to verify attachment after updating the variation
  • Don't bundle instructions, messages, model, or parameters into the tool-attachment PATCH. Send tools alone unless the user explicitly asked for a multi-field update — bundled PATCHes silently clobber UI edits to the other fields.

Related Skills

  • launchdarkly-configs-create -- Create config before attaching tools
  • launchdarkly-configs-variations -- Manage variations with different tool sets

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.