agentleFS
AWSKnown publisheraws/tools-for-devops-agent/skills/launchdarkly-flag-discovery/SKILL.md

launchdarkly-flag-discovery

Skill141 starsChanged 8 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Audit your LaunchDarkly feature flags to understand the landscape, find stale or launched flags, and assess removal readiness. Use when the user asks about flag debt, stale flags, cleanup candidates, flag health, or wants to understand their flag inventory.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before diving into flag data, establish context:

    line 35
  2. Distinctive:

    Understand scope: Ask the user what they're trying to accomplish:

    line 38
  3. Very specific:

    Use get-flags scoped to a critical environment (default to production).

    line 48
  4. Very specific:

    Use search-stale-flags: this is the most efficient entry point.

    line 54
  5. Very specific:

    Default inactiveDays is 30.

    line 58
  6. Very specific:

    Default includeOnly is temporary.

    line 59
  7. Very specific:

    Use get-flag-health for a single-flag deep dive.

    line 62
  8. Very specific:

    Use get-flag-status-across-envs to check if a flag is consistent across environments.

    line 79
  9. Very specific:

    If the user wants to know whether a specific flag can be removed, use get-removal-readiness.

    line 92
  10. Very specific:

    safe: No blockers or warnings. Proceed with cleanup.

    line 94
  11. Distinctive:

    This skill is for discovery, not action: If the user wants to remove a flag from code, that's a change to their repository, which this …

    line 116

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

LaunchDarkly Flag Discovery

You're using a skill that will guide you through auditing and understanding the feature flag landscape in a LaunchDarkly project. Your job is to explore the project, assess the health of its flags, identify what needs attention, and provide actionable recommendations.

Prerequisites

This skill requires the remotely hosted LaunchDarkly MCP server to be configured in your environment.

Required MCP tools:

  • get-flags: search and browse flags with filtering by state, type, tags; with flagKey, get full configuration for a single flag in a specific environment
  • get-flag-status-across-envs: check a flag's lifecycle status across all environments

Optional MCP tools (enhance depth):

  • search-stale-flags: find flags that are candidates for cleanup, sorted by staleness
  • get-flag-health: get combined health view for a single flag (merges status + config)
  • get-removal-readiness: detailed safety check for a specific flag

Workflow

Step 1: Understand the Project

Before diving into flag data, establish context:

  1. Identify the project. Confirm the projectKey with the user. If they haven't specified one, ask.
  2. Understand scope. Ask the user what they're trying to accomplish:
    • Broad audit? ("What's the state of our flags?")
    • Targeted investigation? ("Is this specific flag still needed?")
    • Cleanup planning? ("What flags can we remove?")

Step 2: Explore the Flag Landscape

Adapt your approach to the user's goal:

For a broad audit:

  • Use get-flags scoped to a critical environment (default to production).
  • Note the total count: this tells you the scale of the flag surface area.
  • Filter by state (live, deprecated, archived) to segment the landscape. Lifecycle status (new, active, launched, inactive) comes from get-flag-status-across-envs.
  • Filter by type (temporary vs permanent): temporary flags are the primary cleanup targets.

For cleanup planning:

  • Use search-stale-flags: this is the most efficient entry point. It returns a prioritized list of cleanup candidates sorted by staleness, categorized as:
    • never_requested: created but never evaluated (possibly abandoned)
    • inactive_30d: no SDK evaluations in the specified period
    • launched_no_changes: fully rolled out, no recent changes
  • Default inactiveDays is 30. Increase for conservative cleanup (60, 90) or decrease for aggressive cleanup (7, 14).
  • Default includeOnly is temporary. Set to all to include permanent flags.

For a targeted investigation:

  • Use get-flag-health for a single-flag deep dive. It merges status data with configuration context in one call, returning lifecycle state, last-requested timestamp, targeting summary, age, and whether it's temporary.
  • Or use get-flags with flagKey and env for the full configuration including rules, targets, and fallthrough details.

Step 3: Assess Flag Health

For flags that need deeper investigation, assess health signals. See Flag Health Signals for the full interpretation guide.

Key signals to evaluate:

SignalWhat it tells you
Lifecycle stateWhere the flag is in its journey (new -> active -> launched -> inactive)
Last requestedWhen an SDK last evaluated this flag: staleness indicator
Targeting complexityNumber of rules and targets: removal complexity indicator
Cross-environment consistencyWhether the flag behaves the same everywhere
Flag age + temporary statusOld temporary flags are strong cleanup candidates

Use get-flag-status-across-envs to check if a flag is consistent across environments. A flag inactive in production but active in staging tells a different story than one inactive everywhere.

Step 4: Categorize and Prioritize

Group flags into actionable categories:

  1. Ready to remove: Inactive everywhere, temporary, no dependencies. Tell the user to remove the flag from their code, then archive it in LaunchDarkly.
  2. Likely safe, needs verification: Launched (fully rolled out), no rule changes recently. The user should confirm the rollout is intentionally complete.
  3. Needs investigation: Active in some environments but not others, or has complex targeting. Don't recommend action without more context.
  4. Leave alone: Active flags doing their job, or permanent flags that are intentionally long-lived.

Step 5: Assess Removal Readiness (When Applicable)

If the user wants to know whether a specific flag can be removed, use get-removal-readiness. This tool orchestrates multiple API calls in parallel and returns a structured verdict:

  • safe: No blockers or warnings. Proceed with cleanup.
  • caution: Warnings exist (code references, expiring targets, permanent flag type). Present and let the user decide.
  • blocked: Hard blockers (dependent flags, active requests, targeting rules). Must resolve first.

See Removal Readiness Checklist for the full details on interpreting each signal.

Step 6: Present Findings

Structure your response based on what the user asked for:

For audits: Lead with a summary (total flags, breakdown by state and type), then highlight what needs attention, then provide specific recommendations.

For specific flags: Lead with the verdict (healthy / needs attention / ready to remove), then support it with the signals you found.

For cleanup planning: Lead with the count of cleanup candidates, prioritize by confidence (safest removals first), and link to the cleanup workflow for execution.

Important Context

  • "Launched" means fully rolled out: targeting is on, a single variation is served to everyone, and no changes have been made recently. It doesn't mean "recently deployed."
  • "Inactive" doesn't always mean safe to remove. The flag might be used in code that hasn't shipped yet, or referenced as a prerequisite by another flag.
  • Permanent flags can be inactive on purpose. Some flags are designed to be dormant until needed (kill switches, emergency toggles). Don't automatically flag these for cleanup.
  • Weights are scaled by 1000 in the API. A weight of 60000 means 60%. Always convert to human-readable percentages.
  • This skill is for discovery, not action. If the user wants to remove a flag from code, that's a change to their repository, which this skill doesn't make. If they want to change targeting, direct them to the flag targeting skill.

References

  • Flag Health Signals: How to interpret lifecycle states, staleness, and health data
  • Removal Readiness Checklist: Full safety assessment before recommending flag removal

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.