tf-best-practices
aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws/plugins/aws-startup-advisor/skills/tf-best-practices/SKILL.md
Best-practice authoring guidance AND a read-only policy gate for AWS Terraform generated by a migration skill. Load during any phase that writes a terraform/ directory — first as the "what to emit" posture rules + security-baseline spec, then after writing as the deterministic policy verdict. Read-only: it reports whether the generated Terraform passes; it never edits .tf files, never touches .phase-status.json, and never decides phase completion. Complements (does not replace) terraform fmt/init/validate.
---
name: tf-best-practices
description: >-
Best-practice authoring guidance AND a read-only policy gate for AWS Terraform generated by a
migration skill. Load during any phase that writes a terraform/ directory — first as the "what to
emit" posture rules + security-baseline spec, then after writing as the deterministic policy verdict.
Read-only: it reports whether the generated Terraform passes; it never edits .tf files, never touches
.phase-status.json, and never decides phase completion. Complements (does not replace) terraform
fmt/init/validate.
---
# tf-best-practices — Generated-IaC posture rules + read-only policy gate
A **shared authoring guide and verdict producer**, not a workflow. It answers two
questions for a phase that generates AWS Terraform:
1. **Before writing** — "what security posture must the generated `terraform/` follow?"
(the posture rules + the `baseline.tf` account-hardening spec)
2. **After writing** — "does the generated `terraform/` pass policy?" (a deterministic,
**read-only** verdict + a machine-readable report)
## Routing — load the part that matches your context
This skill is entered at two touchpoints in the caller's Generate flow, with the caller's
own terraform-authoring work in between. **The caller states which touchpoint it is at when it
loads this skill**, and reads the corresponding part:
| Caller context | Load | Why |
| ----------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **About to author `terraform/`** (before writing) | Part 1 → [`references/security-posture-rules.md`](references/security-posture-rules.md) | The "what to emit" AWS authoring rules (gate-enforced + authoring-only + compliance-conditional). |
| **`terraform/` written, ready to validate** (after writing) | Part 2 → [`references/terraform-validation.md`](references/terraform-validation.md) + run the gate script | The `fmt → init → validate → policy` protocol and the read-only verdict. |
Everything this skill states is **source-cloud-agnostic** (pure AWS Terraform). Any GCP/Heroku
detection or artifact reading is the caller's job; where a rule needs a caller-known fact (e.g.
declared compliance frameworks), the caller passes it as a **caller-context signal** — see
`references/security-posture-rules.md` § _Caller-context signals_.
## Boundary (read this first)
This unit is a **verdict producer, never a mutator**. Its entire write surface is the
JSON verdict it is asked to emit. Specifically it **MUST NOT**:
- edit, format, or rewrite any `.tf` file (the caller owns remediation),
- read or write `.phase-status.json` or any run-state file (interpreter-owned),
- decide whether a phase may complete, or prompt the user (caller policy).
The caller (a migration skill's Generate phase) owns: the fix-and-retry loop that edits
the `.tf` it generated, `terraform fmt` auto-apply, the retry/skip/abort prompt, the
Phase Completion gate, and every `.phase-status.json` write. See the consuming skill's
generate phase for how the verdict feeds those decisions.
> **Consumers:** `gcp-to-aws` (prose Generate) and `heroku-to-aws` (DSL Generate). The
> contract is source-agnostic; each caller wires the two touchpoints in its own Generate
> idiom — gcp-to-aws as prose steps, heroku-to-aws as a fragment step plus a fail-closed
> `_postconditions` assert enforced by the interpreter.
## Part 1 — Authoring posture (load before writing `terraform/`)
Emit generated Terraform that satisfies the posture in
[`references/security-posture-rules.md`](references/security-posture-rules.md).
These are the "what good AWS Terraform looks like" rules. Following them makes the Part 2 gate
pass by construction. This unit does not read the caller's artifacts — it consumes only
caller-context signals the caller passes in.
> **Scope.** `security-posture-rules.md` covers, in three tiers:
>
> - **Gate-enforced** (Part 2 verifies statically): ALB TLS, no-public-database, RDS +
> ElastiCache encryption-at-rest, no-public-DB-port ingress, no-public admin/datastore-port
> ingress, no-wildcard-IAM.
> - **Authoring-only** (not gate-checkable, still required): `deletion_protection`,
> master-password-via-Secrets-Manager, S3 hardening, Fargate/EKS/ECR settings, private-subnet
> placement, backups, baseline monitoring.
> - **Compliance-conditional** (emitted when the caller declares `soc2`/`pci`/`hipaa`/`fedramp`):
> VPC flow logs, S3 access logging, secret rotation, customer-managed KMS.
>
> Still the **caller's** own generation concern (candidates to migrate here later): the
> account-hardening `baseline.tf` layer (CloudTrail, GuardDuty, Config, Security Hub).
## Part 2 — Policy gate (run after writing `terraform/`)
Run the read-only checker against the generated directory. Resolve the script path relative to
the plugin root (`$PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/tf-best-practices/scripts/...`), the same convention the
plugin uses for its other scripts:
```bash
python3 "$PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/tf-best-practices/scripts/validate-terraform-policy.py" "$TERRAFORM_DIR" --json "$VERDICT_PATH"
```
- `$TERRAFORM_DIR` — **required, caller-supplied**: the generated `terraform/` directory
(e.g. `$MIGRATION_DIR/terraform`). This skill never defaults or discovers it — the caller
always passes the path it wrote Terraform to.
- `--json $VERDICT_PATH` — optional; writes a machine-readable verdict the caller can merge
into its own `validation-report.json`.
The policy check is one stage of a larger validation flow (`fmt → init → validate → policy`).
The full protocol — including offline-fallback behavior and how the policy verdict maps into a
`validation-report.json` — is documented in
[`references/terraform-validation.md`](references/terraform-validation.md). That protocol is
descriptive: the **caller** owns the fmt/init/validate execution, the fix-and-retry loop, and
the report write; this unit contributes only the read-only policy stage + verdict shape.
### Exit codes → caller action
| Exit | stdout | Meaning | Caller does |
| ---- | ------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `0` | `POLICY_OK` | posture satisfied | proceed |
| `1` | `POLICY_FAIL` | violations present | read `violations[]`, edit the named `.tf` sites, re-run (caller's retry budget) |
| `2` | (usage error) | bad path / IO | surface to user; do not treat as pass |
### Verdict shape (`--json`)
```json
{
"check": "policy",
"policy_status": "POLICY_OK | POLICY_FAIL",
"violations": [
{
"check": "policy",
"rule": "alb_https_listener | alb_http_redirect | no_tf_files",
"file": "compute.tf",
"line": 7,
"severity": "error",
"summary": "human-readable violation",
"fix_hint": "concrete remediation the caller can apply"
}
]
}
```
Each `violations[]` entry is **actionable evidence** — `file` + `line` + `fix_hint` tell the
caller exactly what to edit. The caller applies the edit; this unit only reports.
## Policy rules enforced today
Every rule is **fail-open on ambiguity** — it fires only on unambiguous, in-block literal
evidence, so a valid stack is never falsely blocked (a `POLICY_FAIL` is a hard completion gate
for the caller, so a false positive would block a real migration).
**Internet-facing ALB TLS posture** (an ALB is internet-facing when `internal` is absent,
`false`, or variable-driven — fail-safe):
- **`alb_https_listener`** — must have an HTTPS listener on `443` with `certificate_arn` and a
`forward` action.
- **`alb_http_redirect`** — an HTTP `:80` listener must `redirect` to HTTPS, never `forward`
to targets. Internal ALBs (`internal = true`) are exempt.
> **Elastic Beanstalk ALBs are invisible to these rules.** The ALB rules inspect standalone
> `aws_lb_listener` blocks. An EB **LoadBalanced** environment provisions its ALB from
> `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` `setting` blocks, which the static checker does not read —
> so a pure-EB design passes the ALB rules **vacuously** (no listener to inspect). EB listener/TLS
> posture is therefore authoring-only, not gate-enforced. (Fixtures `good-heroku-eb-only`
> and `good-heroku-eb-singleinstance` document this; `good-heroku-eb-loadbalanced` carries a
> standalone ALB so the listener rules are exercised on real blocks.)
**Managed database exposure & encryption** (`aws_db_instance`, `aws_rds_cluster`):
- **`rds_not_public`** — must not set `publicly_accessible = true` (absent/variable → fail-open).
- **`rds_encryption_at_rest`** — must set `storage_encrypted = true`; missing or literal `false`
fires (RDS defaults to unencrypted), variable-driven fails open. S3 is not checked (default
SSE-S3 since Jan 2023).
**ElastiCache encryption** (`aws_elasticache_replication_group`, Redis `aws_elasticache_cluster`):
- **`elasticache_encryption_at_rest`** — a replication group must set
`at_rest_encryption_enabled = true`; missing or literal `false` fires, variable-driven fails
open.
- **`elasticache_cluster_encryption`** — a Redis-engine `aws_elasticache_cluster` (single-node:
`engine = "redis"`, no `replication_group_id`) must set BOTH `at_rest_encryption_enabled = true`
and `transit_encryption_enabled = true`; missing or literal `false` on either fires,
variable-driven fails open. `engine = "memcached"` clusters (and variable-driven/absent engine)
are exempt — Memcached does not support these attributes.
**Security group ingress:**
- **`db_sg_no_public_ingress`** — an inline `aws_security_group` ingress covering `5432`/`3306`
must not allow `0.0.0.0/0` or `::/0`.
- **`sg_no_public_admin_ingress`** — an inline ingress must not open a curated never-public
admin/datastore port (`22`, `3389`, `6379`, `11211`, `27017`, `9200`/`9300`, `5601`) to
`0.0.0.0/0` or `::/0`. Web (`80`/`443`) and app/game ports are not flagged; DB ports are
handled by the rule above. Both check `cidr_blocks` and `ipv6_cidr_blocks` independently, so a
benign IPv4 list does not mask an open IPv6 one. Both: separate `aws_security_group_rule` /
`aws_vpc_security_group_ingress_rule` resources fail open (not correlated).
**IAM least-privilege** (`aws_iam_policy`, `aws_iam_role_policy`, `aws_iam_group_policy`,
`aws_iam_user_policy`):
- **`no_wildcard_iam`** — an `Allow` statement must not use `Action`/`Resource` `"*"`.
The one narrow exception is an isolated
`elasticbeanstalk:CreateStorageLocation` statement with `Resource = "*"` because
AWS does not support resource-level permissions for that action.
`aws_iam_policy_document` data sources and assume-role trust policies fail open.
> The checker is a zero-dependency static HCL reader (no `terraform init`, no provider
> download) — it runs even when the registry is unreachable. It uses brace-depth matching
> for nested blocks, so a valid HTTPS listener written with a nested `forward { ... }`
> block is **not** a false failure.
## Fixtures (also the checker's regression suite)
`fixtures/terraform-policy/` holds **intentionally-shaped** Terraform used by
`scripts/test_validate_terraform_policy.py`:
- `bad-http-forward/` — internet-facing ALB that forwards plaintext HTTP → MUST `POLICY_FAIL`.
- `internal-alb-only/` — internal ALB on HTTP → MUST `POLICY_OK` (HTTP allowed internally).
- `good-https-redirect/` — the correct pattern → `POLICY_OK`.
These are deliberately non-compliant test data (never deployed). They are excluded from the
repo-wide `checkov` scan via `.checkov.yaml` `skip-path`; do **not** "harden" them — doing so
breaks the tests that assert the failure paths.
## Verification
```bash
# from skills/tf-best-practices/
uv run --python 3.12 --with pytest python -m pytest scripts/test_validate_terraform_policy.py -q
```
Discussion
Did this work in your project? Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
No one has posted yet. Be the first.

