eks-upgrade-check
Skill93 starsChanged 21 days agoMIT-0View on GitHub
Assess EKS cluster upgrade readiness — run automated checks across 8 areas (version, breaking changes, deprecated APIs, add-on compatibility, node readiness, workload risks, AWS Insights, upgrade plan), calculate a 0-100 readiness score with a hard-blocker override, and generate a markdown/HTML report with prioritized remediation. Use this skill whenever someone asks "can I upgrade my cluster?", "is my cluster ready for 1.32?", "are we good to go to 1.33?", "what is blocking my upgrade?", or "should we move to the next version?" — even if they do not say "readiness" or "score". Falls back to AWS CLI and kubectl when the EKS MCP server is unavailable.
- Reads credentials
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- rules/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- apexSkill
- dotnet-aws-ecsSkill
- ecs-architectSkill
- ecs-buildSkill
- ecs-devopsSkill
- ecs-genaiSkill
- ecs-modernizeSkill
- ecs-observabilitySkill
- ecs-operation-reviewSkill
- ecs-reconSkill
- ecs-securitySkill
- eks-best-practicesSkill
- eks-buildSkill
- eks-cost-intelligenceSkill
- eks-designSkill
- eks-genaiSkill
- eks-ingress-migrationSkill
- eks-mcp-serverSkill
- eks-operation-reviewSkill
- eks-platform-engineeringSkill
- eks-reconSkill
- eks-securitySkill
- eks-well-architected-reviewSkill
- graviton-migrationSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- terraform-skillSkill
- update-docsSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 51
Hard Blocker Override: If any hard blocker is detected (e.g., incompatible Karpenter, critical add-on DEGRADED, cluster subnets …
- Very specific: line 105
Run aws eks list-clusters to discover available clusters.
- Distinctive: line 121
Wait for the user to resolve the issue.
- Very specific: line 125
Run aws eks describe-cluster --name <cluster> and show: cluster name, Kubernetes version, platform version, region, status, account ID.
- Very specific: line 131
Check the status field from the cluster description.
- Distinctive: line 135
Do NOT proceed with the assessment if cluster status is not ACTIVE.
- Distinctive: line 141
3a — AWS API preflight: After describing the cluster, verify key AWS permissions by attempting:
- Very specific: line 165
If kubectl auth can-i itself errors (not a clean yes/no), treat the read as denied.
- Distinctive: line 178
Ask: *"Your cluster is on v[current].
- Distinctive: line 180
If the user specifies a version more than 1 minor version ahead, explain that EKS requires one-version-at-a-time upgrades and show the …
- Very specific: line 186
Read each steering file in order from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/.
- Distinctive: line 187
Read the steering file
- Very specific: line 207
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/report-generation.md and produce the report.
- Distinctive: line 213
Do NOT call any tools when this skill is first activated: Wait for the user to ask.
- Distinctive: line 214
Do NOT hardcode or guess cluster names: Always discover by listing first.
- Very specific: line 217
Use
awsCLI andkubectlfor cluster queries: If MCP servers are available, prefer them for EKS operations. - Very specific: line 227
HTML: Run python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/tools/md_to_html.py <report>.md to convert
- Distinctive: line 229
Do NOT generate HTML manually.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
EKS Upgrade Readiness Skill
Overview
This skill assesses your live EKS cluster's readiness for a Kubernetes version upgrade. It connects to your cluster via AWS CLI and kubectl, runs automated checks across 8 assessment areas, calculates a readiness score (0-100%), and produces a detailed report with prioritized remediation steps and pre-filled AWS CLI commands.
This skill is laser-focused on upgrade safety — answering the question: "Is it safe to upgrade this cluster to the next version?"
Read-only / assessment-only — hard rule. This skill ONLY inspects the cluster; it MUST NOT modify it. Every
aws,kubectl, and MCP call it issues must be a read/list/describe operation. NEVER run mutating verbs (apply,create,delete,patch,edit,replace,annotate,label,set,scale,cordon,drain,update-*,--force, etc.), and NEVER execute a remediation snippet. Any mutating command embedded in a steering file is a recommendation for the user to run themselves — surface it as text, do not execute it.
What Gets Assessed
| # | Section | Key Checks |
| 01 | Version Validation | Upgrade path validity, version skew policy, support status |
| 02 | Breaking Changes | Version-specific API removals, behavioral changes, resource impact |
| 03 | Deprecated API Detection | Live scan of cluster resources for deprecated/removed APIs |
| 04 | Add-on Compatibility | Core add-on versions, OSS add-on matrix, Karpenter compatibility |
| 05 | Node Readiness | Node version skew, AL2→AL2023 migration, AMI compatibility |
| 06 | Workload Risks | Single replicas, missing PDBs, health probes, resource requests |
| 07 | AWS Upgrade Insights | Official EKS pre-upgrade checks and recommendations |
| 08 | Upgrade Plan | Pre-filled CLI commands, step-by-step upgrade sequence |
Readiness Score
The skill calculates a weighted readiness score:
| Category | Max Deduction | Rationale |
| Breaking Changes | 25 pts | Highest risk — can break apps |
| Deprecated APIs | 20 pts | Actionable, fixable pre-upgrade |
| Node Readiness (skew + subnet IPs) | 20 pts | Can block upgrade entirely |
| Unsupported Version | 15 pts | No security patches, urgent upgrade needed |
| Add-on Compatibility | 15 pts | Critical > optional add-ons |
| Karpenter | 10 pts | Only if installed |
| Workload Risks | 10 pts | Best-practice, not blockers |
| AWS Upgrade Insights | 10 pts | Official AWS checks |
| AL2 Nodes / Behavioral | 10 pts | Informational |
Hard Blocker Override: If any hard blocker is detected (e.g., incompatible Karpenter, critical
add-on DEGRADED, cluster subnets collectively cannot place control-plane ENIs, cluster not ACTIVE), the score is capped at ≤ 59% (NOT READY)
regardless of other findings. See references/report-generation.md for the full list.
Score Interpretation:
- 90-100: READY — Safe to proceed
- 80-89: GOOD — Minor issues, can proceed with caution
- 70-79: FAIR — Several issues need attention first
- 60-69: RISKY — Significant issues, not recommended yet
- 0-59: NOT READY — Critical blockers, must resolve first
Prerequisites
- AWS credentials configured —
aws configureor~/.aws/credentialswith EKS access - kubectl access to the target cluster (for Kubernetes API queries)
- Required AWS Permissions:
eks:DescribeCluster,eks:ListClusters,eks:ListNodegroups,eks:DescribeNodegroupeks:ListAddons,eks:DescribeAddon,eks:DescribeAddonVersions,eks:ListInsights,eks:DescribeInsightec2:DescribeSubnets
MCP Server Setup
This skill works without any MCP server — it falls back to AWS CLI and kubectl commands. That fallback path is the default in apex.
For richer EKS operations (live cluster reads, upgrade insights, K8s resource introspection), enable the EKS MCP server via the apex eks-mcp-server skill — it walks you through both AWS-hosted and self-hosted setup options. Once configured, this skill will prefer MCP tools over CLI for EKS operations.
Note: Apex does NOT ship a project-root .mcp.json. MCP setup is opt-in and user-driven through the eks-mcp-server skill.
Configuration
The skill uses your existing AWS credentials. No additional configuration needed if aws eks list-clusters works from your terminal.
To use a specific profile or region, set environment variables:
export AWS_PROFILE=your-profile-name
export AWS_REGION=your-regionGetting Started
Invoke the skill: /eks-upgrade-check
Or simply ask: "Run an EKS upgrade readiness assessment"
The skill will discover your clusters, ask which one to assess and what target version, then run the full assessment.
Assessment Workflow
Step 0: Pre-flight
Action 1 — List clusters (test connectivity & discover clusters)
Run aws eks list-clusters to discover available clusters.
Region caveat.
aws eks list-clustersis region-scoped (it lists only the current/--regionregion) and returns names only, not regions. An empty result means "no clusters in this region," NOT "no clusters in the account" — before treating zero clusters as terminal, confirm the intended region (echo $AWS_REGION) and, if the region is ambiguous, list the likely regions. Any "name + region" shown to the user pairs the returned name with the region actually queried.
- ✅ Success → Show the cluster list. Ask which cluster to assess. If only one cluster, confirm it.
- ❌ Failure → STOP. Do NOT retry more than once. Show:
Cannot access EKS clusters. Try these steps:
- Check that AWS credentials are configured:
aws sts get-caller-identity- Check your region:
aws eks list-clusters --region <region>- Check that MCP servers are enabled in Claude Code
Wait for the user to resolve the issue.
Action 2 — Describe the selected cluster
Run aws eks describe-cluster --name <cluster> and show: cluster name, Kubernetes version, platform version, region, status, account ID.
Account ID hygiene: the account ID (from
aws sts get-caller-identity/ the cluster ARN) is sensitive. If the report will be shared outside the account, mask or omit the account ID before sharing.
Action 2b — Validate cluster status
Check the status field from the cluster description. If status is NOT ACTIVE:
- CREATING/UPDATING/DELETING → STOP. Show: "Cluster is currently in
<status>state. The EKS API will reject an upgrade request. Wait for the operation to complete, then re-run this assessment." - FAILED → STOP. Show: "Cluster is in FAILED state. This is a hard blocker — the cluster must be recovered before an upgrade can be attempted. Contact AWS Support if the cluster is stuck in FAILED."
Do NOT proceed with the assessment if cluster status is not ACTIVE. This is a hard blocker (see report-generation.md).
Cluster status gates the whole assessment; node group status gates node readiness. If a node group's lifecycle status == UPDATING (mid-rotation), the assessment can still run but node readings may be a transient old/new mix — flag it as potentially unstable and recommend re-running after rotation (see node-readiness.md §5.1).
Action 3 — Validate permissions (AWS + Kubernetes)
3a — AWS API preflight. After describing the cluster, verify key AWS permissions by attempting:
aws eks list-nodegroups --cluster-name <cluster>aws eks list-addons --cluster-name <cluster>aws eks describe-addon-versions --kubernetes-version <current>(add-on compatibility —addon-compatibility.mdmarks this a MUST-run read)aws eks list-insights --cluster-name <cluster>aws ec2 describe-subnets --subnet-ids <cluster subnet ids>(node-readiness subnet-IP hard-blocker input)
eks:DescribeCluster / eks:DescribeNodegroup / eks:DescribeAddon / eks:DescribeInsight are
exercised implicitly by the assessment steps themselves; the probes above cover the list/describe
reads that gate scoring inputs.
3b — Kubernetes RBAC preflight. The high-weight assessment categories read Kubernetes objects,
not just AWS APIs. Verify cluster read access with kubectl auth can-i before scanning:
kubectl auth can-i list deployments -A # workloads (workload-risks, deprecated-apis)
kubectl auth can-i list daemonsets -A # workloads
kubectl auth can-i list statefulsets -A # workloads
kubectl auth can-i list validatingwebhookconfigurations # webhooks (breaking-changes)
kubectl auth can-i list mutatingwebhookconfigurations # webhooks
kubectl auth can-i list horizontalpodautoscalers -A # HPA (deprecated-apis)
kubectl auth can-i list nodepools.karpenter.sh # Karpenter nodepools (node-readiness, addon-compat)If kubectl auth can-i itself errors (not a clean yes/no), treat the read as denied.
Denied-read discipline (same for the AWS and Kubernetes preflights). If any probe above
returns AccessDenied (AWS) or no (kubectl) → surface exactly which read is denied and the IAM
action or RBAC verb/resource needed, then ask the user whether to (a) fix the permission and
re-run the probe, or (b) continue with a partial assessment. A denied read is NOT a hard stop
and NOT a silent 0: the affected category is reported UNKNOWN / not-scored and listed in
## Unassessed, per references/report-generation.md. A partial assessment can NEVER yield an
uncaveated READY — the headline verdict carries the partial marker and is capped below READY.
The guarantee this preflight gives extends only to the reads it actually probes.
Action 4 — Determine target version
Ask: "Your cluster is on v[current]. The next version is v[current+1]. Shall I assess upgrade readiness to v[current+1]?"
If the user specifies a version more than 1 minor version ahead, explain that EKS requires one-version-at-a-time upgrades and show the required path (e.g., 1.29 → 1.30 → 1.31 → 1.32). Offer to assess the first hop.
Action 5 — Confirm and proceed
Steps 1-8: Run Assessment
Read each steering file in order from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/. For each section:
- Read the steering file
- Execute the checks described in it using AWS CLI and kubectl commands
- Collect findings with severity ratings
Steering file loading guide:
| User Request | Steering File(s) |
| Full upgrade assessment | ALL files in order |
| Version / upgrade path | references/version-validation.md |
| Breaking changes / API removals | references/breaking-changes.md |
| Deprecated APIs | references/deprecated-apis.md |
| Add-on compatibility / Karpenter | references/addon-compatibility.md |
| Node readiness / AL2 / AMI | references/node-readiness.md |
| Workload risks / PDB / probes | references/workload-risks.md |
| AWS Insights | references/upgrade-insights.md |
| Generate report | references/report-generation.md |
Step 9: Calculate Score & Generate Report
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/report-generation.md and produce the report.
Tool Usage Rules
- Do NOT call any tools when this skill is first activated. Wait for the user to ask.
- Do NOT hardcode or guess cluster names. Always discover by listing first.
- Do NOT retry a failed command more than once.
- Always read the relevant steering file before executing checks for that section.
- Use
awsCLI andkubectlfor cluster queries. If MCP servers are available, prefer them for EKS operations.
Data Files
- OSS Add-on Registry:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/data/oss_addon_registry.json— identifiers and authoritative upstream URLs for common OSS add-ons. This file does NOT contain compatibility data. Compatibility is always verified live via the registry'scompatibility_urlandreleases_urlfields. If an add-on is not in the registry or the upstream source is unreachable, report UNKNOWN — never guess. - HTML Converter:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/tools/md_to_html.py— converts markdown reports to HTML
Report Output
- Markdown:
EKS-Upgrade-Assessment-<cluster>-<current>-to-<target>-<YYYY-MM-DD>-<HHMM>.md - HTML: Run
python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/tools/md_to_html.py <report>.mdto convert
Do NOT generate HTML manually. Always use the conversion script.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

