agentleFS
avav/skills/agent-integration-testing/SKILL.md

agent-integration-testing

Skill28 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user requests integration testing, feature validation, or test plan execution

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • av/harborword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the user specifies a feature area, use glob and grep to narrow the investigation.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Create a test spec file at ./tests/<name>.md.

    line 18
  3. Very specific:

    Use <name> = "integration" unless the user specifies a particular feature area.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    CRITICAL: Every expectation must be strictly verifiable by an agent using available tools (e.g., shell commands, HTTP requests, reading …

    line 26
  5. Very specific:

    If the user explicitly specifies that failures should be fixed, spawn another subagent (e.g., the SWE or BUILDER agent) to investigate and …

    line 34

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Agent Integration Testing

Overview

This skill guides the creation and autonomous execution of verifiable integration test specifications. It ensures that tests are actionable by agents, properly documented, and systematically executed by subagents to validate features or fix failures.

Core Process

  1. Investigate Codebase Area
    • By default, investigate the entire codebase to understand the context.
    • If the user specifies a feature area, use glob and grep to narrow the investigation.
  2. Write Test Specification
    • Create a test spec file at ./tests/<name>.md.
    • Use <name> = "integration" unless the user specifies a particular feature area.
    • The document MUST include a Prerequisites section at the top detailing any setup needed before tests become runnable (e.g., environment variables, database seeding, background services).
  3. Define Verifiable Tests
    • Each test must be written in plain English.
    • Include clear steps to reproduce.
    • Include a set of expectations.
    • CRITICAL: Every expectation must be strictly verifiable by an agent using available tools (e.g., shell commands, HTTP requests, reading file outputs). If a test cannot be verified by an agent, it is invalid and must be rewritten or removed.
  4. Execute Tests via Subagents
    • Spawn subagents (using the Task tool or @mention subagent system) to run each individual test.
    • The subagent must follow the prerequisites, execute the steps, and validate the outcomes against the expectations.
    • Collect the results (Pass/Fail and logs) from the subagents.
  5. Fix Failures (Optional)
    • If the user explicitly specifies that failures should be fixed, spawn another subagent (e.g., the SWE or BUILDER agent) to investigate and fix any noted failures.

Quick Reference

ActionPattern / Command
Test File Location./tests/<name>.md (default: integration.md)
PrerequisitesMust be documented at the top of the test file
Test FormatPlain English, Repro Steps, Verifiable Expectations
ExecutionSpawn one subagent per test or test suite
FixingSpawn SWE/BUILDER subagent if requested by user

Red Flags - STOP and Start Over

  • Unverifiable Tests: "Verify the UI looks nice" or "Check if the animation is smooth." (Agents cannot verify visual aesthetics without specific tools). Fix: Rewrite to check DOM elements, network responses, or file states.
  • Missing Prerequisites: Subagents failing because the server wasn't started. Fix: Ensure the prerequisite section explicitly defines the commands to start dependencies.
  • Executing Tests Manually: Running tests in the main conversation thread instead of spawning subagents. Fix: Dispatch parallel subagents for isolated execution.

Example Test Specification (./tests/auth-integration.md)

# Auth Integration Tests

## Prerequisites
- Start the test database: `docker compose up -d db`
- Run migrations: `npm run migrate`
- Start the server in background: `npm run start:test &`

## Test 1: User Registration
**Steps:**
1. Send a POST request to `/api/register` with payload `{"email": "test@example.com", "password": "pass"}`.

**Expectations:**
1. The HTTP response status must be `201 Created`.
2. A subsequent query to the database using `sqlite3 test.db "SELECT email FROM users WHERE email='test@example.com';"` must return the email.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.