using-superpowers
Skill9 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 4 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 139 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 7
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
- Common: line 11
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.
- Common: line 13
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE.
- Distinctive: line 26
If your project instructions say "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions.
- Very specific: line 30
Use read_file on the skill's SKILL.md file to load it.
- Common: line 101
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 139 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<SUBAGENT-STOP>
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill.
</SUBAGENT-STOP><EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
Instruction Priority
Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:
- User's explicit instructions (copilot-instructions.md, .instructions.md, direct requests) — highest priority
- Superpowers skills — override default system behavior where they conflict
- Default system prompt — lowest priority
If your project instructions say "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
How to Access Skills
Use read_file on the skill's SKILL.md file to load it. Skills are referenced by file path from your .github/copilot-instructions.md.
Tool Mapping
Some skills reference Claude Code tool names. Use these Copilot equivalents:
Task→runSubagentTodoWrite→manage_todo_listSkill→read_fileon the SKILL.md pathRead/Write/Edit→read_file/create_file/replace_string_in_fileBash→run_in_terminal
Full mapping: references/copilot-tools.md
Using Skills
The Rule
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Read skill file" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create manage_todo_list per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Read skill file" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Read skill file" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create manage_todo_list per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create manage_todo_list per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}Red Flags
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
Skill Priority
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
- Process skills first (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
- Implementation skills second (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Skill Types
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
User Instructions
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
Other versions152 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 137
- obra/superpowers★ 305k53% same
- openai/plugins★ 7.4k55% same
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6k74% same
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3k84% same
- coco-research/coco★ 79776% same
- Trevoke/org-gtd.el★ 48553% same
- koaning/wigglystuff★ 43755% same
- oasm-platform/open-asm★ 26074% same
- totvs/engpro-advpl-tlpp-skills★ 16681% same
- haojing8312/WorkClaw★ 14184% same
127 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 15
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- shibit-net/xuanji-community★ 90same name
- GEd520/legados★ 75same name
- roman01la/skills-agents★ 48same name
- zhouguoqing/QianYuan.AIAgenticFramework★ 35same name
- PANYUXIN6/pyx-skills★ 8same name
- rzx007/openharness-ts★ 3same name
- rzx007/Vykor★ 3same name
- NenadBanjeglav/superpowers-architecture★ 2same name
- Geek-Bob/SuperpowersLite★ 1same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GEd520Skillchinese-code-review
中文 review 沟通参考——话术模板、分级标注(必须修复/建议修改/仅供参考)、国内团队常见反模式应对。仅在用户显式 /chinese-code-review 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。
Also in 7 projects that use this
GEd520Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 commit 与 changelog 配置参考——Conventional Commits 中文适配、commitlint/husky/commitizen 中文模板、conventional-changelog 中文配置。仅在用户显式 /chinese-commit-conventions 时调用,不要根据上下文自动触发。
Also in 7 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 12 projects that use this
10CGSkillworkflow-runner
十步循环轻量编排器,协调 Phase Skills 执行,支持灵活组合。
Also in 7 projects that use this
kntismSkillcondition-based-waiting
Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
Also in 3 projects that use this
kntismSkilldefense-in-depth
Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from GEd520
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- brainstormingSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

