account-notes
Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when stage 19 of the prospecting system needs a pre-meeting account brief for a qualified lead — company, person, competitive context, recent signals, pain hypotheses, and questions — that a rep can scan in five minutes. Also use standalone before any sales call.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- audience-discoverySkill
- audience-filterSkill
- buying-signalsSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- contact-enrichmentSkill
- customer-patternsSkill
- follower-scrapeSkill
- follow-upsSkill
- icp-definitionSkill
- lead-prioritizationSkill
- lead-qualificationSkill
- lead-scoringSkill
- linkedin-outreachSkill
- lookalike-researchSkill
- personalizationSkill
- pipeline-reviewSkill
- prospecting-systemSkill
- reply-classificationSkill
- segmentationSkill
- targeted-searchSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈15
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Start from what the run already knows: why they were targeted (source_type, signals), what was sent, what they replied.
- Distinctive: line 17
Every claim carries its source URL or the run file it came from.
- Distinctive: line 39
When this skill is loaded for the first time, Claude should:
- Distinctive: line 40
Ask the user about their specific context (industry, ICP, tools, voice, processes)
- Distinctive: line 42
Update the skill file with the user's answers
- Distinctive: line 43
Only then proceed to execute the skill
- Distinctive: line 61
Gather context from the user before researching: Ask for:
- Distinctive: line 72
Do not produce a generic briefing.
- Distinctive: line 158
Do NOT: Pitch features. Show slides.
- Distinctive: line 168
Do NOT: Repeat the same discovery questions from call one.
- Distinctive: line 178
Do NOT: Show every feature.
- Distinctive: line 188
Do NOT: Discount immediately.
- Distinctive: line 198
Do NOT: Take the renewal for granted.
- Distinctive: line 380
Run through this before every call.
- Distinctive: line 423
Keep a running "objection library" for your product.
- Distinctive: line 426
After the call, send the follow-up email within 2 hours.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Discovery Prep
Pipeline contract
Stage 19 of 20. Reads 18-qualified.csv plus that lead's rows in 09-signals.csv, 13-personalized.csv, and 17-replies.csv. Writes 19-account-notes/<account_domain>.md.
- Start from what the run already knows: why they were targeted (
source_type, signals), what was sent, what they replied. Research only the gaps. - Every claim carries its source URL or the run file it came from. Unknown stays "unknown".
- One brief per booked or likely meeting — not for the whole list.
Files live in runs/<run>/. Column definitions: /prospecting-system. Standalone use: ignore this block.
<!--
WHAT THIS DOES: Generates a pre-call research briefing doc for any sales meeting.
Covers company research, prospect research, competitive landscape, recent signals,
pain hypotheses, talking points, and objection handling. Outputs a one-pager your
rep can scan in 5 minutes before the call.
HOW TO USE: Reference this file in your CLAUDE.md skills section. Tell Claude:
"Use the sales call prep skill to build a briefing doc for my meeting with
[prospect name] at [company]." Provide the prospect's name, title, company,
and any context you already have (how they entered the pipeline, email thread, etc.).
-->Customize This Skill
This is a template, not a finished skill. Before using it for real work, customize it for your business.
When this skill is loaded for the first time, Claude should:
- Ask the user about their specific context (industry, ICP, tools, voice, processes)
- Suggest specific edits to the frameworks and templates below
- Update the skill file with the user's answers
- Only then proceed to execute the skill
To customize, tell Claude: "Read this skill and help me adapt it for my business. Interview me about what needs to change."
The frameworks below are proven starting points from running hundreds of campaigns. But they work 10x better once you plug in your specific tools, voice, and data.
When to Use
- Preparing for a first call with a new prospect
- Briefing before a follow-up or demo call with new stakeholders joining
- Re-engaging a stale opportunity (refresh your knowledge before reaching back out)
- Preparing for an upsell or expansion conversation with an existing customer
- Any meeting where you have 15+ minutes of prep time and access to research tools
Before You Start
Gather context from the user before researching. Ask for:
- Who is the meeting with? (Name, title, company. If multiple stakeholders, get all names.)
- What type of call is this? (First call, follow-up, demo, negotiation, renewal - this changes the entire briefing structure. See "Call Type Playbooks" below.)
- How did they enter your pipeline? (Inbound, outbound, referral, event, warm intro)
- What do you already know? (Prior emails, notes, CRM history, anything from a previous conversation)
- What do you sell? (So the briefing can tailor pain hypotheses and value props to your product)
- How much time do you have for prep? (10 minutes = layers 1-2 only. 30 minutes = all 4 layers.)
- Any specific concerns or objectives for this call?
- What is the desired outcome of this call? (Second meeting, demo scheduled, proposal requested, verbal yes)
Do not produce a generic briefing. The value of this skill is specificity. A briefing that could apply to any company is a wasted briefing.
Research Framework
Research happens in four layers. Each layer adds depth. For a quick 10-minute prep, cover layers 1 and 2. For a high-value meeting, cover all four.
Layer 1: Company Research
Goal: Understand what this company does, how big it is, and what stage it is at.
| Data Point | Where to Find It | Why It Matters |
| What they sell | Company website (homepage + product pages) | Grounds every talking point in their reality |
| Company size (headcount) | LinkedIn company page, enrichment tools | Determines pain points, buying process, budget |
| Revenue / ARR (if available) | Crunchbase, PitchBook, press releases | Qualifies deal size and budget expectations |
| Funding history | Crunchbase, enrichment tools | Recent funding = budget + growth pressure |
| Key markets / geographies | Website "about" page, job postings | Shapes how you position your solution |
| Business model | Website, LinkedIn | B2B vs. B2C vs. marketplace changes the conversation |
| Recent news | Google News, company blog, press page | Shows you did homework. Gives you conversation starters. |
| Tech stack (if relevant) | BuiltWith, Wappalyzer, job postings | Reveals what tools they already use and where gaps might exist |
| Org structure / decision-makers | LinkedIn (filter by department), annual reports | Maps the buying committee before the call |
| Financial health indicators | Annual reports, SEC filings, Glassdoor trends | Tells you if they are growing, flat, or contracting |
Layer 2: Prospect Research
Goal: Understand who you are talking to, what they care about, and how they communicate.
| Data Point | Where to Find It | Why It Matters |
| Current title and tenure | LinkedIn profile | How long they have been in role shapes their priorities |
| Previous roles | LinkedIn profile | Career path reveals what they value and their expertise |
| LinkedIn activity (recent posts, comments) | LinkedIn feed | Tells you what topics they care about right now |
| Mutual connections | Potential warm intro or reference point | |
| Content they have published | LinkedIn, company blog, podcasts, conference talks | Quoting their own words back to them builds instant rapport |
| Their team structure | LinkedIn company page (filter by department) | Helps you understand who else might be in the buying committee |
| Communication style | LinkedIn posts, email thread history | Adjust your tone: are they formal or casual? Data-driven or narrative? |
| Recent job change or promotion | LinkedIn, enrichment tools | New in role = new priorities, open to new vendors, needs quick wins |
| Personality cues | LinkedIn about section, post tone, response patterns | DISC/behavioral hints help you mirror their pace and style |
Layer 3: Competitive Landscape
Goal: Know who else they might be evaluating, using, or comparing you to.
| Data Point | Where to Find It | Why It Matters |
| Current tools they use (in your category) | BuiltWith, job postings, case studies | If they already have a solution, you need a displacement angle |
| Competitors they are evaluating | G2, Capterra reviews, direct ask in prior conversation | Lets you proactively position against the right alternative |
| Why customers switch from competitors | Your own win/loss analysis, G2 reviews of competitors | Gives you specific talking points about what your competitors lack |
| Industry analyst reports | Gartner, Forrester, G2 Grid (if available) | Useful for enterprise buyers who rely on analyst validation |
| Competitor pricing model | G2, competitor website, sales intel from your team | Helps you position your pricing before the question comes up |
| DIY / in-house alternative | Job postings (are they hiring for this function?) | If they are building internally, your pitch is speed-to-value and focus |
| Contract renewal timing | Prior conversations, enrichment tools | If they are mid-contract elsewhere, timeline shifts. If near renewal, urgency increases. |
Layer 4: Recent Signals
Goal: Find time-sensitive events that create urgency or relevance.
| Signal | Where to Find It | How to Use It |
| New executive hire (CRO, VP Sales, CMO) | LinkedIn, enrichment tools | New leaders bring new priorities. "I noticed you just joined..." |
| Funding round | Crunchbase, TechCrunch, press releases | Growth capital = new budget = urgency to deploy it |
| Job postings for roles you support | LinkedIn Jobs, Indeed, company careers page | Hiring signals what they are investing in next |
| Product launch or major update | Company blog, Product Hunt, press | Congratulate them. Tie your value to their new direction. |
| Earnings report or public filing | SEC filings, earnings calls | For public companies, reveals strategic priorities |
| Industry event participation | Event speaker lists, LinkedIn posts | "I saw you spoke at [event] about [topic]..." |
| Layoffs or restructuring | LinkedIn, press, Glassdoor | Sensitive. Do not mention directly. But it tells you budget is tight and priorities shifted. |
| Customer wins or awards | Company blog, press releases, LinkedIn | Positive signal. Congratulate. Then ask what is next. |
| Executive departure | LinkedIn, press | May mean strategy shift, budget freeze, or new decision-maker incoming |
| Negative press or product issues | Google News, Reddit, Twitter/X | Do NOT bring up. But it tells you their current headspace and may create urgency. |
Call Type Playbooks
Different call types demand different prep. Always identify the call type first, then follow the relevant playbook.
First Call (Discovery)
Primary goal: Validate pain hypotheses. Earn a second conversation.
- Prep emphasis: Layers 1-2 (company + prospect). Layer 4 if time allows.
- Talking ratio: You talk 30%, they talk 70%.
- Structure: Rapport (2 min) > Context-setting (1 min) > Discovery questions (15-20 min) > Brief value statement (3 min) > Next steps (2 min).
- Key questions: Focus on current state, pain points, and what "good" looks like for them.
- Do NOT: Pitch features. Show slides. Demo anything. Talk pricing unless they ask.
- Success metric: They agree to a second meeting with a clear reason.
Follow-Up / Second Call
Primary goal: Deepen understanding. Expand to other stakeholders. Build the business case.
- Prep emphasis: Review notes from first call. Research any new stakeholders joining. Layer 3 (competitive) becomes critical.
- Structure: Recap first call (2 min, confirm you heard them right) > Deeper discovery on specific pain (10 min) > Present tailored solution (10 min) > Address concerns (5 min) > Next steps (3 min).
- Key questions: "Last time you mentioned [X]. Has anything changed?" / "Who else on your team would this affect?" / "What would solving this be worth to your team?"
- Do NOT: Repeat the same discovery questions from call one. They will notice.
- Success metric: Clear next step (demo, proposal, or intro to decision-maker).
Demo
Primary goal: Show them exactly how your solution solves their specific problem. Not a feature tour.
- Prep emphasis: Map their stated pain points to specific product capabilities. Prepare 2-3 scenarios using their language.
- Structure: Recap their situation (2 min) > Show solution to pain #1 (8 min) > Show solution to pain #2 (8 min) > Q&A (10 min) > Next steps (2 min).
- Key questions: "Does this match how your team would use it?" / "What would you change about what you just saw?"
- Do NOT: Show every feature. Click through settings screens. Demo things they did not ask about. Say "and another cool thing is..." more than once.
- Success metric: They say "Can you send pricing?" or "When can we start?"
Negotiation / Proposal Review
Primary goal: Agree on terms. Remove final blockers. Get to yes.
- Prep emphasis: Competitive positioning (Layer 3), contract terms, ROI calculation, internal champion coaching.
- Structure: Confirm mutual interest (1 min) > Walk through proposal (10 min) > Address objections one at a time (15 min) > Agree on terms or next step (5 min).
- Key questions: "What would need to be true for you to move forward this month?" / "Is there anyone else who needs to sign off?"
- Do NOT: Discount immediately. Show desperation. Rush past objections. Assume silence means agreement.
- Success metric: Signed contract, or clear timeline with named blocker.
Renewal / Upsell
Primary goal: Demonstrate value delivered. Expand the relationship.
- Prep emphasis: Usage data, ROI metrics from their engagement, new features since they signed, their evolving needs.
- Structure: Review wins together (5 min) > Share metrics (5 min) > Discuss what is next for their team (10 min) > Present expansion opportunity (5 min) > Next steps (5 min).
- Key questions: "What has been most valuable so far?" / "What are your priorities for the next quarter?" / "Is there a team adjacent to yours that faces similar challenges?"
- Do NOT: Take the renewal for granted. Skip the value review. Pitch expansion before confirming satisfaction.
- Success metric: Renewal confirmed, or expansion meeting scheduled.
Briefing Doc Template
This is the output. A one-pager the rep can scan in 5 minutes. Fill in each section based on your research.
============================================================
SALES CALL BRIEFING
============================================================
MEETING: [Date] [Time] [Duration]
PROSPECT: [Name], [Title]
COMPANY: [Company Name]
CALL TYPE: [First call / Follow-up / Demo / Negotiation / Renewal]
SOURCE: [How they entered pipeline: inbound, outbound, referral, event]
DESIRED OUTCOME: [What you want to walk away with]
============================================================
30-SECOND VERSION (if you only have time for this)
============================================================
- They are a [size] [industry] company that [what they do].
- You are talking to [Name] who is [title, tenure].
- They likely care about [top pain hypothesis].
- Open with: [one specific reference to their world].
- Ask: [one killer discovery question].
- Propose: [specific next step] at the end.
------------------------------------------------------------
1. COMPANY SNAPSHOT
------------------------------------------------------------
- What they do: [1-2 sentences]
- Size: [Headcount] employees, [Revenue if known]
- Stage: [Bootstrapped / Seed / Series X / Public]
- Key markets: [Geographies or verticals]
- Recent news: [1-2 bullet points of relevant recent events]
- Key decision-makers: [Names/titles of likely buying committee members]
------------------------------------------------------------
2. PROSPECT PROFILE
------------------------------------------------------------
- Role: [Title], in role since [date]
- Background: [Previous companies/roles, 1-2 sentences]
- LinkedIn activity: [What they post about, any recent notable content]
- Communication style: [Formal/casual, data-driven/narrative, fast/deliberate]
- Mutual connections: [Names, if any]
- Personal hooks: [Specific things to reference - a post they wrote,
a conference they spoke at, a career milestone]
------------------------------------------------------------
3. PAIN HYPOTHESIS
------------------------------------------------------------
Based on their company stage, role, and signals, they are likely facing:
- Pain 1: [Specific problem + why you think they have it + evidence]
- Pain 2: [Specific problem + why you think they have it + evidence]
- Pain 3: [Specific problem + why you think they have it + evidence]
Note: These are hypotheses. The call's job is to validate or disprove them.
Lead with curiosity, not assumptions.
------------------------------------------------------------
4. TALKING POINTS (adapted for call type)
------------------------------------------------------------
- Open with: [Specific reference to something personal - their content,
a mutual connection, a recent company event. NOT "tell me about your role."]
- Bridge to pain: [Transition question that moves from rapport to discovery.
Example: "I saw you recently [signal]. A lot of [similar role] are telling
us [pain]. Are you seeing the same thing?"]
- Value prop (if asked): [One sentence. Outcome-focused, not feature-focused.
Format: "We help [who] achieve [outcome] without [pain they currently feel]."]
- Proof point: [One specific example - company name if allowed, metric,
timeframe. "We helped [similar company] go from [before] to [after]
in [timeframe]."]
------------------------------------------------------------
5. QUESTIONS TO ASK
------------------------------------------------------------
Discovery (validate pain hypotheses):
1. "Walk me through how you currently handle [area you address]."
2. "What is working about that process? Where does it break down?"
3. "If you could fix one thing about [area], what would it be?"
4. "What has that problem cost you - in time, revenue, or headcount?"
Qualification:
5. "Who else would be involved in evaluating something like this?"
6. "What does your timeline look like for making a change?"
7. "Have you looked at other solutions? What did you like or not like?"
8. "Is there a budget allocated for solving this, or would we need to
build the case together?"
Closing:
9. "Based on what we discussed, would it make sense to [specific next step]?"
10. "What would need to happen on your end before [next step]?"
Stage-specific questions (pick based on call type):
- Follow-up: "Last time you mentioned [X]. Has anything changed since then?"
- Demo: "Does this match how your team would actually use it day-to-day?"
- Negotiation: "What is the one thing that would make this a no-brainer?"
- Renewal: "What has been most valuable to your team over the past [period]?"
------------------------------------------------------------
6. OBJECTIONS TO EXPECT
------------------------------------------------------------
| Likely Objection | Why They Say It | Your Response |
|------------------|-----------------|---------------|
| "We already have a solution for this" | Status quo bias, switching cost fear | "That makes sense. What made you take this meeting despite having something in place?" (Forces them to articulate the gap.) |
| "The timing isn't right" | No urgency or competing priorities | Tie to a signal: "You mentioned [X is a priority]. What changes if you wait another quarter to address it?" |
| "I need to talk to my team" | Not the sole decision-maker | "Totally understand. Would it help if I put together a one-pager they can review? Who specifically should I tailor it for?" |
| "Send me more info" | Polite brush-off or genuinely need material | "Happy to. What specifically would be most useful - a case study, pricing overview, or product walkthrough?" (Narrows the ask. If they cannot say what they need, it is a brush-off.) |
| "It's too expensive" | Budget constraint or unclear ROI | "Help me understand - too expensive relative to what? Your current cost, another vendor, or the budget you had in mind?" |
| "We tried something like this before and it failed" | Past trauma, risk aversion | "What went wrong last time?" (Listen fully.) Then: "Here is specifically how our approach is different on that exact point." |
| "Can you just send a proposal?" | Skipping discovery, wants to compare on price | "I want to make sure any proposal actually fits your situation. Can I ask two more questions so I don't waste your time with something generic?" |
| "Our team won't adopt this" | Change management concern | "That is the #1 concern we hear. Here is how [similar company] rolled it out - they started with [small scope] and expanded from there." |
| "We're going to build this in-house" | Belief they can DIY cheaper | "Some of our best customers started that way. The question is usually not 'can we build it' but 'should our engineers spend 6 months on this vs. shipping [core product feature]?'" |
| "I'm not the right person for this" | Genuinely wrong contact, or deflecting | "Appreciate you telling me. Who on your team would own a decision like this? Would you be open to making an intro?" |
------------------------------------------------------------
7. COMPETITIVE POSITIONING
------------------------------------------------------------
If they mention [Competitor A]: [Your key differentiator. One sentence.]
If they mention [Competitor B]: [Your key differentiator. One sentence.]
If they are doing it in-house: [Why your solution beats DIY at their stage.]
If they say "We're not looking at anyone else": [Reframe around the cost of
the status quo, not the cost of competitors.]
------------------------------------------------------------
8. DO NOT SAY
------------------------------------------------------------
- Do not trash competitors by name. Differentiate, don't denigrate.
- Do not say "We're the best at..." (let proof points do this).
- Do not bring up pricing unless they ask. If they ask early,
give a range and redirect: "It depends on scope. Let me understand
your situation first so I can give you an accurate number."
- Do not say "That's a great question" before every answer.
- Do not promise things you cannot deliver to win the deal.
- Do not mention features that are "coming soon" as if they exist today.
------------------------------------------------------------
9. NEXT STEPS TO PROPOSE
------------------------------------------------------------
Based on call type, propose ONE of:
- [ ] Send tailored follow-up with [specific resource]
- [ ] Schedule demo with [their team + your SE]
- [ ] Share proposal / pricing
- [ ] Intro to [customer reference in their industry]
- [ ] Trial / pilot with defined success criteria
- [ ] Schedule follow-up with [additional stakeholder they named]
Always confirm: who, what, and when. "I'll send you [X] by [date],
and let's book [next meeting] for [specific day]. Does [day/time] work?"
============================================================Data Sources Quick Reference
Where to pull research data, organized by what you need.
| What You Need | Free Sources | Paid Sources |
| Company overview | LinkedIn, Crunchbase (free tier), company website | PitchBook, ZoomInfo |
| Prospect profile | LinkedIn (basic), Google search | LinkedIn Sales Navigator, Apollo |
| Tech stack | Job postings, BuiltWith (free), Wappalyzer | Clay, ZoomInfo |
| Funding data | Crunchbase (free tier), press releases | PitchBook, CB Insights |
| Intent signals | LinkedIn activity, job postings, Google Alerts | Bombora, G2 Buyer Intent, Clay signals |
| Competitive intel | G2 reviews, Capterra, competitor website | Klue, Crayon |
| News and events | Google News, company blog, Twitter/X | Feedly, Meltwater |
| CRM history | Your CRM (check for past interactions, notes, deals) | N/A |
| Past email threads | Your inbox, shared inbox | N/A |
| Org chart / buying committee | LinkedIn (manual), annual reports | LinkedIn Sales Nav, ZoomInfo Org Charts |
| Financial health | SEC filings (public cos), Crunchbase | PitchBook, Dun & Bradstreet |
Pre-Call Checklist
Run through this before every call. If you cannot check at least 6 of these, you are underprepared.
- I know what the company does and their approximate size
- I know the prospect's title, tenure, and background
- I have 1-2 recent signals or news items to reference
- I have a pain hypothesis (at least one) grounded in research, not assumption
- I have 3+ discovery questions written down, tailored to this specific prospect
- I know who the likely competitors or alternatives are
- I have a specific proof point ready (customer story, metric, timeframe)
- I have a clear next step to propose at the end of the call
- I have checked my CRM for any prior interactions or notes
- I know who else might be on the call and have researched them
- My calendar is blocked 5 minutes before the call for final review
- My tech is tested (Zoom/Teams link works, screen share ready if demo)
- I have the briefing doc open on a second screen or printed
Anti-Patterns
| Pattern | Why It Fails | Fix |
| "Tell me about your role" as an opener | Lazy. Shows zero research. Wastes the first 5 minutes. | Reference something specific from their LinkedIn or recent activity. |
| Reading a script | Prospects can tell. It kills rapport instantly. | Use the briefing doc as a reference, not a teleprompter. Internalize the key points. |
| Pitching before discovering | You are solving a problem you have not confirmed they have. | Ask 3 discovery questions before presenting any solution. |
| No prepared next step | The call ends with "I'll follow up." That is not a next step. | Always propose a specific action: send X, schedule Y, intro to Z. |
| Winging it because "I'm good at talking" | Confidence without preparation leads to generic conversations that don't convert. | Even 10 minutes of prep produces better outcomes than none. |
| Researching only the company, not the person | The person on the call makes the decision, not the company. | Spend equal time on prospect research and company research. |
| Over-preparing to the point of paralysis | You do not need to know everything. You need to know enough to ask good questions. | Time-box your prep: 10 minutes for standard calls, 30 minutes for high-value meetings. |
| Talking past the close | The prospect says "This sounds great, what's next?" and you keep pitching. | When you hear buying signals, stop talking. Propose the next step immediately. |
| Demoing features nobody asked about | The "And one more thing..." trap. You lose their attention and dilute your message. | Only demo what maps directly to a stated pain point. If they did not mention it, skip it. |
| Same prep for every call type | A first call and a negotiation call need fundamentally different prep. | Identify the call type first. Follow the matching playbook above. |
| Not reviewing CRM notes from the last touchpoint | You ask questions they already answered. They feel unheard. | Always read the last 3 CRM activities before the call. Summarize what you know upfront. |
Tips
- The goal of the first call is almost never to close. It is to understand their situation, validate your pain hypothesis, and earn the right to a second conversation.
- Quote their own words back to them. If they wrote a LinkedIn post about a challenge, reference it. If they said something in a prior email, bring it up. Nothing builds rapport faster.
- Silence is a tool. After asking a question, wait. The prospect will fill the silence with information you would never have gotten by talking over them.
- Take notes during the call and update your CRM within 10 minutes after. Memory decays fast. The briefing doc is wasted if the follow-up is generic.
- For calls with multiple stakeholders, prepare separate prospect profiles for each person. Different roles have different pain points and different decision criteria.
- Keep a running "objection library" for your product. Every time you hear a new objection, document it with the best response. This compounds over time.
- The best closers are the best listeners. If you are talking more than 40% of the time on a discovery call, you are talking too much.
- Send a calendar invite with a brief agenda 24 hours before the call. It reduces no-shows and sets expectations. Example: "Looking forward to learning about [their specific situation]. I'll share how we have helped similar teams with [relevant outcome]."
- After the call, send the follow-up email within 2 hours. Recap what you discussed, confirm the next step, and attach anything you promised. Speed signals professionalism.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

