agentleFS
automatewithudayautomatewithuday/GTM-Skills/skills/positive-reply-scoring/SKILL.md

positive-reply-scoring

Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when judging whether a Smartlead campaign is actually working: pull replies, classify them (interested, soft positive, referral, neutral, negative, OOO, bounce, unsubscribe), and compute positive reply rate against the 1% bar. Also use when raw reply rate looks fine but pipeline is not showing up.

  • Reads credentials

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every reply is classified into exactly one bucket:

    line 33
  2. Distinctive:

    Run the fetch script:

    line 62
  3. Distinctive:

    Write aggregate results to:

    line 155
  4. Distinctive:

    After a campaign has run for at least 14 days (otherwise sample is too small)

    line 173
  5. Distinctive:

    When comparing two campaigns in an experiment (use the same cutoff date for both)

    line 174
  6. Distinctive:

    Before deciding to kill or scale a campaign

    line 176
  7. Distinctive:

    Classify only FIRST reply per lead: If a lead replied, you replied, they replied again — only the first reply is the signal.

    line 184

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Positive Reply Scoring

Reply rate tells you if people are paying attention. Positive reply rate tells you if they want what you're selling. This skill computes the second.

Why this exists

A campaign can get 5% reply rate and still be a disaster. If 90% of those replies are "unsubscribe" and "not a fit," you're burning your domains for nothing.

The metric that matters is:

positive_reply_rate = positive_replies / total_sent

Compared side-by-side:

  • Campaign A: 1% reply rate, 70% positive → 0.7% positive reply rate
  • Campaign B: 5% reply rate, 10% positive → 0.5% positive reply rate
  • Campaign A wins.

Classification schema

Every reply is classified into exactly one bucket:

LabelMeaningCount as "positive"?
positive_interested"Yes, tell me more" or booked a meeting✅
positive_soft"Send more info" / "reach out in Q3" / info request✅
positive_referral"Not me, but talk to X"✅ (referral is high-value)
neutral_questionClarifying question, no commitment yet❌ (optional — some score as half)
negative_notnow"Not right now, maybe later"❌
negative_notfit"Not a fit" / "we don't need this"❌
negative_hostileAngry reply, complaint, report❌ (and track separately as risk signal)
unsubscribeExplicit opt-out❌
oooOut-of-office auto-reply❌ (exclude from denominators)
bounceTechnical bounce❌ (exclude from denominators)
otherCan't tell❌

Positive reply rate = (positive_interested + positive_soft + positive_referral) / total_sent

Inputs

  • Smartlead API key (env: SMARTLEAD_API_KEY)
  • Campaign ID to score
  • Optional: client_id (if using a sub-client setup)
  • Optional: date range (defaults to full campaign)

Steps

1. Fetch all leads + replies from the campaign

Run the fetch script:

npx tsx scripts/fetch-campaign-replies.ts --campaign-id=12345 --out=/tmp/replies.json

This walks /campaigns/{id}/leads paginated, identifies leads with replies (has_reply = true), then fetches /campaigns/{id}/leads/{lead_id}/message-history for each, and writes them to a JSON file with one object per reply.

Output schema per reply:

{
  "lead_id": "...",
  "email": "...",
  "lead_first_name": "...",
  "company": "...",
  "reply_time": "ISO timestamp",
  "reply_subject": "...",
  "reply_body": "... full text ...",
  "sequence_step": 1
}

2. Classify replies in the Claude Code conversation

Once the JSON is written, Claude (the one running this skill) reads the file and classifies each reply. For speed, fan out in batches of 20-30 via the Task tool (see personalization-subagent-pattern skill for fan-out mechanics).

Classification prompt (per batch):

Classify each reply as one of:
- positive_interested, positive_soft, positive_referral
- neutral_question
- negative_notnow, negative_notfit, negative_hostile
- unsubscribe, ooo, bounce, other

For each reply, output: { lead_id, label, confidence: 0.0-1.0, one_line_reason }

Rules:
- OOO auto-replies ("I'm out of office") → ooo
- Bounces (delivery failure messages) → bounce
- "Take me off your list", "unsubscribe", "STOP" → unsubscribe
- "Not interested", "not a fit" → negative_notfit
- "Not right now, circle back in Q3" → negative_notnow
- "Try [other person]" → positive_referral
- "Send more info" or "Tell me more" → positive_soft
- "Yes, let's book a call", "what times work" → positive_interested
- Insults, reports, legal threats → negative_hostile

If confidence < 0.7, label as `other`.

3. Aggregate + compute rates

Run the aggregator:

npx tsx scripts/aggregate-scores.ts --replies=/tmp/classified-replies.json --campaign-id=12345

Output (to stdout + optional --out):

Campaign 12345 — Positive Reply Scoring

Total sent:              5,284
Total replies:              212 (4.01%)
  ooo/bounce (excluded):    34
  Net replies:             178

Breakdown:
  positive_interested:    22
  positive_soft:          31
  positive_referral:       8
  neutral_question:       14
  negative_notnow:        28
  negative_notfit:        52
  negative_hostile:        3
  unsubscribe:            20
  other:                   0

Positive reply rate:     1.15% (61 / 5,284)
Positive % of replies:   34.3% (61 / 178)
Negative hostile risk:    0.06% (3 / 5,284)
Unsub rate:              0.38% (20 / 5,284)

Benchmarks (B2B cold email):
  Good positive reply rate: ≥1%
  Great: ≥2%
  Hostile >0.3% or unsub >2% → deliverability risk, pause campaign

4. Save to disk

Write aggregate results to:

~/cold-email-ai-skills/profiles/<business-slug>/scores/<campaign-id>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.json

This builds a history so you can trend positive reply rate over campaigns.

5. Flag action items

At the end, surface:

  • Positive replies that need a human response — list the top 10 positive_interested leads and their reply bodies. The user should reply to these within 30 seconds of seeing this report.
  • Referrals that need follow-up — positive_referral labels. Add the referred contacts to a new outreach list.
  • Hostile flags — any negative_hostile replies. Read them manually; consider pausing the inbox if someone is genuinely angry.
  • Unsubscribes — confirm they're globally suppressed (Smartlead does this automatically, but double-check).

When to use this skill

  • After a campaign has run for at least 14 days (otherwise sample is too small)
  • When comparing two campaigns in an experiment (use the same cutoff date for both)
  • Weekly as a quality check on running campaigns
  • Before deciding to kill or scale a campaign

Common gotchas

  • Don't trust reply rate alone. A 5% reply rate from spam-trap replies and unsubscribes is worse than a 2% reply rate from real buyers.
  • Exclude OOO + bounce from denominators. They're not real replies. The script does this automatically.
  • Smartlead's built-in AI categorization exists but is less controllable. This skill uses Claude directly for transparency and prompt-tunable classification.
  • Small samples lie. Below ~500 sent, the positive reply rate has too much noise. Wait for more volume before declaring winners/losers.
  • Classify only FIRST reply per lead. If a lead replied, you replied, they replied again — only the first reply is the signal. Later messages are the conversation, not the scoring.

What to do next

Respond to every positive_interested reply within 30 seconds of seeing it. Then /experiment-design to plan the next iteration based on what worked.

If positive reply rate is <1% after 200+ sends: the 1% rule failed. Run /email-deliverability-audit (are you reaching the inbox?) (check for vague CTAs, generic first lines, em dashes).

Or wait: this skill is the Wednesday task in /cold-email-weekly-rhythm. Run it weekly going forward.

Related skills

  • /experiment-design — uses positive reply rate as the success metric
  • /email-deliverability-audit — if hostile + unsub are elevated, run this next
  • /cold-email-starter-kit → 10-reply-handling.md for what to do with the positive replies once flagged

Scripts

  • scripts/fetch-campaign-replies.ts — pulls replies via Smartlead API
  • scripts/aggregate-scores.ts — computes rates from classified JSON

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.