brainstorm
Skill351 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Explore an ambiguous idea with the user, settle scope and success criteria, and produce an independently reviewed design for wish.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nielsmadan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- phuthuycoding/kanban-flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- baethon/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- CloudChef/atlasclaw-providerstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- LongJohnSilver1504/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use playtest-report, team-polish and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 9 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 6 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +8 more from CoralGame
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- namastexlabs/automagik-genie★ 351100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- codeaholicguy/ai-devkit★ 1.7ksame name
- jtydhr88/ComfyTV★ 1.2ksame name
- event-driven-io/emmett★ 562same name
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- bkywksj/knowledge-base★ 340same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- first-fluke/fullstack-starter★ 226same name
- Arman-Kudaibergenov/1c-ai-development-kit★ 163same name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 155 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Use when the problem, approach, or boundaries need decisions.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 155 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorm
Use when the problem, approach, or boundaries need decisions. Explore with the user; do not implement. Resume a related draft rather than starting another: the slug names .genie/brainstorms/<slug>/, whose DRAFT.md carries the state of every round.
The brainstorm is a saved workflow that runs one round per invocation, because a workflow cannot wait for a person: the owner answers between runs. The single source of truth is .claude/workflows/brainstorm.js in the genie repository's workflow catalog (see .claude/workflows/README.md there); this skill is its front door and carries no stage roster of its own. On a runtime that runs saved workflows, run the script at <repository root>/.claude/workflows/brainstorm.js when that file exists, otherwise ~/.claude/workflows/brainstorm.js (delivered by genie install / genie update); give the runtime that explicit script path, never a bare name — both scopes carry these names and the order a name resolves in is undocumented. On a runtime that does not, or where neither file exists, follow "Without a workflow surface" below.
Invoke
Pass {slug, request?, answers?, repo, tools: {ledger, evidence, reviewContract}, councilCeiling, repairBudget, model?, timestamp} through args, every path absolute:
slugis lowercase letters, digits and dashes;requestis the idea in the owner's words;repois the repository root;timestampis the caller's clock, since the workflow has none;modelpins every stage.toolsresolve from this skill's own directory, never from the checkout, so a round runs from any repository:ledgerisreferences/round-ledger.mjs,evidenceisreferences/design-review-evidence.mjs, andreviewContractisreview/SKILL.mdin the skills directory that holds this one, thereviewskill installed beside it; a single-skill install has none, and the run endsfailednaming the path. The design template stays atreferences/design-template.mdbeside the ledger, where the workflow finds it.councilCeilingis the valuegenie config get budgets.maxCouncilsPerBrainstormprints andrepairBudgetthe valuegenie config get budgets.maxEscalationsPerGroupprints, each passed as an integer, never as the printed string: the workflow treats anything that is not an integer as unset, so the string "0" would quietly raise an owner's ceiling of 0 to the default 1. Whengenieis absent or a read exits non-zero — an installed release older than the council key exits 1 on it — pass that value's schema default (ceiling 1, repair budget 2) and say so when you relay the result.
Each round
- Run the script, then relay the WRS bar (
wrs.bar), the plan as run and thenotes. Whatever the state, rungenie wish report <runId> --appendwith the run id the runtime reported, and relay its output: the run's tokens and time per stage, and one row in the machine-local ledger. Withoutgenie, relay the run id and say the run's cost was not recorded. - Relay
questionsthrough the runtime's question harness, at most four per batch: each question's text, header,multiSelectflag, option descriptions and option labels exactly as returned, in the order returned, with no rephrasing and no translation. Ids and kinds stay outside the harness payload. - Map the answers back to ids by question order and invoke again with
answers: [{id, question, answer}]: the id, the question text as the harness returned it, and the picked label (an array of labels for a multi-select) or the owner's own words verbatim. Leave out a question nobody answered; it stays Asked and comes back next round. - An empty
round, with no question to relay, is a valid result: invoke again.
The per-question rule, verbatim: "An answer settles only the question it answers. Nothing rides along: a change the owner was not asked about, including any edit to something they already approved, goes in its own question. An approved decision is reopened only by a question that quotes it and shows old → new. Moves that add scrutiny may be taken and announced; moves that reduce what the owner sees, or change what they approved, wait for their answer."
state is one of:
round— questions to relay, including acouncil-approvalquestion (convene past the ceiling or not) or areview-findingsquestion (repair again, I settle them, stop).done— DESIGN.md carries a verified SHIP stamp; the only next route iswish.answered— the owner ended with a recorded verdict and no design.blocked— a ledger refusal the owner must resolve, a BLOCKED review, the repair budget spent, or the owner's stop. Stop is permanent for the slug: resuming needs a new slug or a deliberate reopen.failed— a spine agent returned nothing, the ledger could not start, or the review contract is missing;notConvenednames the agents.
Simplicity Gate
Choose the simplest complete design satisfying current user stories. Justify added state, caches, synchronization, configuration, or background work with a present requirement or measurement. Bound current data and separate history before introducing distribution machinery. Name concrete triggers for deferred complexity.
Planning index
.genie/INDEX.md is the single intake index. Reconcile a legacy .genie/brainstorm.md idempotently into it when encountered; do not maintain two indexes or duplicate entries. After each run, write this slug's entry with a link to brainstorms/<slug>/: Simmering while rounds run, Ready at done. An answered, blocked or failed run leaves the entry in Simmering with the state and its one-line reason beside it, since no reviewed design exists to make it Ready.
- Raw: captured idea.
- Simmering: draft with unresolved decisions.
- Ready: reviewed design awaiting a wish.
- Poured: an existing WISH.md has persisted APPROVED status.
A design or a score alone never makes an entry Poured. Update only the related entry and preserve unrelated material. Ensure the design and the index accompany the wish in version control; in a shared workspace the coordinator stages them. Report the DRAFT and DESIGN paths, the state and the next route. Task-board pointers are optional; unavailable tracking does not block the design.
Without a workflow surface
Run the same spine inline, one round per turn, as references/without-a-workflow.md lays out: the ledger commands through the shell, the lead's work in this session, scouts and the review through the runtime's native delegation surface, and each question as numbered options with its id, recommended first, answered in the same {id, question, answer} shape. At WRS 100 with nothing open, write .genie/brainstorms/<slug>/DESIGN.md from references/design-template.md and run the ledger's check-design. Send the exact design to an independent review agent with review/SKILL.md's contract, the DRAFT, and the files the design changes as required reading. The reviewer returns verdict, identity, UTC time, findings, and reviewed-sha256 for the content it actually reviewed; this skill bundles references/design-review-evidence.mjs, and the caller passes the reviewer's digest unchanged to the stamp command:
node "<brainstorm-skill-dir>/references/design-review-evidence.mjs" stamp ".genie/brainstorms/<slug>/DESIGN.md" --verdict SHIP --reviewed-sha256 "<reviewer-returned-sha256>" --reviewer "<reviewer-id>" --reviewed-at "<UTC-time>"
node "<brainstorm-skill-dir>/references/design-review-evidence.mjs" verify ".genie/brainstorms/<slug>/DESIGN.md"Stamp the actual verdict, including FIX-FIRST or BLOCKED; the example shows SHIP. Stamping rejects an edit made after review; changing any reviewed design content invalidates the evidence. Never substitute a locally recomputed digest for the reviewer’s value. Record every verdict with the ledger's review command, repair a FIX-FIRST within the repair budget, and obtain fresh review before wish consumes the design.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

