desktop / rules
Cursor rule2.5k starsChanged 19 months agoApache-2.0Archived repositoryView on GitHub
Writing a good commit message
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 4,144 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/avoid-unnecessary-comments.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/component-creation.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/rule-storage.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/template-system.mdcCursor rule
The file
We split this conventional-commits.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 40
Follow this format for all commits:
- Distinctive: line 56
No period at the end
- Distinctive: line 83
Add token-based verification with:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
---
description: Writing a good commit message
globs: *
---
# Conventional Commits
A rule to enforce proper conventional commit formatting with clear, descriptive messages.
<rule>
name: conventional_commits
description: Enforces conventional commit format with concise, explanatory first lines
filters:
- type: event
pattern: "git_commit"
actions:
- type: reject
conditions:
# Reject non-conventional commit types
- pattern: "^(?!feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert)(?:\\(.*\\))?:"
message: "Commit message must start with a conventional type (feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore, revert)"
# Reject first lines that are too long (>72 chars)
- pattern: "^.{73,}"
message: "First line should be 72 characters or less to avoid truncation in GitHub and other tools"
# Reject commits without a space after the colon
- pattern: "^\\w+(?:\\(.*\\))?:(?!\\s)"
message: "Include a space after the colon in your commit message"
# Reject first lines that start with lowercase (after the type)
- pattern: "^\\w+(?:\\(.*\\))?:\\s[a-z]"
message: "First word after type should be capitalized"
- type: suggest
message: |
# Conventional Commit Format
Follow this format for all commits:
```
type(scope): Short summary
Detailed explanation if needed
```
## Requirements:
- **Type**: One of: feat, fix, docs, style, refactor, perf, test, build, ci, chore, revert
- **Scope**: Optional component name in parentheses
- **Summary**:
- Clear and concise (50-72 chars)
- Written in imperative ("Add feature" not "Added feature")
- First letter capitalized
- No period at the end
- **Body**: Optional, separated by blank line, explains WHY not HOW
## Examples:
✅ `feat(auth): Add password reset functionality`
✅ `fix: Prevent crash when API returns empty response`
✅ `docs(readme): Update installation instructions`
examples:
- input: |
added new button to the ui
output: |
feat(ui): Add new button
- input: |
fixed the bug in authentication
output: |
fix(auth): Resolve authentication failure on expired sessions
- input: |
feat(users): implemented email verification system with token expiration and email templates for better onboarding experience
output: |
feat(users): Implement email verification system
Add token-based verification with:
- 24h expiration
- Customized email templates
- Improved onboarding flow
metadata:
priority: high
version: 1.0
</rule>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

