sddp-reverseengineer
Skill98 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Onboard an existing codebase through resumable, evidence-led bootstrap reconstruction. Direct command-bar dispatch only; do not select for general queries.
In this repository73 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- sddp-amendSkill
- sddp-analyzeSkill
- sddp-autopilotSkill
- sddp-checklistSkill
- sddp-clarifySkill
- sddp-devopsSkill
- sddp-devsetupSkill
- sddp-implement-qc-loopSkill
- sddp-implementSkill
- sddp-initSkill
- sddp-planSkill
- sddp-prdSkill
- sddp-projectplanSkill
- sddp-qcSkill
- sddp-regenSkill
- sddp-specifySkill
- sddp-systemdesignSkill
- sddp-tasksSkill
- sddp-amendSkill
- sddp-analyzeSkill
- sddp-autopilotSkill
- sddp-checklistSkill
- sddp-clarifySkill
- sddp-devopsSkill
- sddp-devsetupSkill
- sddp-implement-qc-loopSkill
- sddp-implementSkill
- sddp-initSkill
- sddp-planSkill
- sddp-prdSkill
- sddp-projectplanSkill
- sddp-qcSkill
- sddp-regenSkill
- sddp-reverseengineerSkill
- sddp-specifySkill
- sddp-systemdesignSkill
- sddp-tasksSkill
- adr-authoringSkill
- artifact-conventionsSkill
- clarification-strategiesSkill
- compact-communicationSkill
- evidence-led-authoringSkill
- implementation-standardsSkill
- instructions-managementSkill
- markdown-compressionSkill
- plan-authoringSkill
- quality-assuranceSkill
- sdd-methodologySkill
- sddp-amendSkill
- sddp-analyzeSkill
- sddp-autopilotSkill
- sddp-checklistSkill
- sddp-clarifySkill
- sddp-devopsSkill
- sddp-devsetupSkill
- sddp-implement-qc-loopSkill
- sddp-implementSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Argument hint: [repository scope or context; --resume or --status]
Command category: project-bootstrap
Prerequisites: none
Pass $ARGUMENTS unchanged, or empty when omitted. No control starts onboarding; supported controls are --resume and --status.
Load and follow the workflow in .github/sddp/workflows/reverse-engineering/WORKFLOW.md.
Ask the user explicitly in chat and wait at every consequential decision/publication checkpoint. Recommendations are guidance only; never infer answers from silence or a partial response. Allow free-form answers wherever the workflow permits them. Default to static local inspection; repository execution and network access need explicit bounded approval. Report milestone progress.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.