agentleFS
attentiondotnetattentiondotnet/davidondrej-skills/skills/thinking-and-docs/interview-style-doc-building/SKILL.md

interview-style-doc-building

Skill11 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user wants to build a structured strategic document by answering questions (life priorities, goals docs, framework files, ranked lists, principles, reviews). Interview one question at a time, patch the file after each answer, then re-ask. Not for day planning (use day-plan).

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Wait for the answer: Don't ask the next question yet.

    line 22
  2. Distinctive:

    One question at a time: Never dump multiple questions in a single message.

    line 29
  3. Very specific:

    Patch, don't overwrite: After the initial skeleton, use patch for every update.

    line 30
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask dynamics, not names: When the user references a person, don't ask "who is X?" — ask about the role/dynamic.

    line 33
  5. Distinctive:

    No speculative additions: Don't invent sections, edge cases, or "anything else?" prompts unless the user asks.

    line 35
  6. Distinctive:

    Read the relevant section (if not already in context).

    line 47
  7. Distinctive:

    Overwriting the file: instead of patching specific sections — destroys prior content.

    line 62

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Interview-Style Doc Building

The user's preferred mode for creating durable strategic docs. AI does NOT propose content — AI asks one question, the user answers, AI patches the file, AI asks the next question. The file IS the conversation's output, updated incrementally.

When to use

  • Building a new SSOT file (life priorities, life vision, principles, frameworks, ranked lists).
  • Filling out a structured doc the user explicitly wants to author themselves.
  • Quarterly/annual reviews where the user's words go into the file.

NOT for: day planning (use day-plan), task triage (organize-tasks), or anything where AI proposes content first.

The Loop

  1. Create the file with a skeleton (header, sections, "to be filled in" placeholders). Single write_file for the new file. After this, NEVER overwrite — only patch.
  2. Ask ONE question. Concise. Specific. Single-faceted. Open-ended where possible.
  3. Wait for the answer. Don't ask the next question yet.
  4. Patch the file with the user's answer in the correct section.
  5. Re-ask — next question, or follow-up if the answer was incomplete.
  6. Repeat until the file is complete.

Hard Rules

  • One question at a time. Never dump multiple questions in a single message. The user has flagged this.
  • Patch, don't overwrite. After the initial skeleton, use patch for every update. Never write_file to an existing doc.
  • Update the file BEFORE asking the next question. Order: receive answer → patch file → ask next question. Not the reverse.
  • Lists from the user are UNORDERED SETS. When the user lists items in response to "which X should we cover?" or "what are the Ys?", that is a SET, not a ranking. Never infer rank, priority, or sequence from the order they typed them. If you need ordering, ask explicitly: "Which of these is #1?"
  • Ask dynamics, not names. When the user references a person, don't ask "who is X?" — ask about the role/dynamic.
  • No snark, no attitude, no filler. Concise questions, concise acknowledgments.
  • No speculative additions. Don't invent sections, edge cases, or "anything else?" prompts unless the user asks.

Question Design

  • Domain-discovery, not confirmation. "What wins against everything else?" — not "Is Business #1?"
  • Surface new reality. Each question should pull out info AI doesn't already have.
  • Engine-move framing where applicable. "What's the thing that, if true, makes the rest obvious?"
  • Concrete over abstract. "What's #2 — the domain that wins against everything except #1?" beats "Tell me about your second priority."

File Patching Pattern

After each answer:

  1. Read the relevant section (if not already in context).
  2. patch with old_string = placeholder or previous entry, new_string = updated content with the user's words preserved.
  3. Confirm the diff. Move on.

For ranked lists, append one rank at a time:

1. **Business** — Q2 #1 goal: ...
2. **Health** — get below 81.0 kg, sleep 9h/day, ...

Each rank gets patched in as the user confirms it.

Common Pitfalls

  • Assuming order from a set. The user lists "A, B, C, D" → AI writes "1. A, 2. B, 3. C, 4. D" → the user flags it. ALWAYS confirm rank explicitly.
  • Asking too many questions at once. Even bundling 2 violates the rule.
  • Overwriting the file instead of patching specific sections — destroys prior content.
  • Adding AI-generated content to fill out sections. Sections stay empty until the user provides the content.
  • Skipping the file update between Q&A pairs — the doc falls out of sync.

Pairing with Other Skills

  • day-plan — different pattern (task triage), not interview-style.
  • organize-tasks — Todoist-specific.
  • memory-management — separate from this; persona/preferences go to memory.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.