make-content-source-to-units
Skill1.3k starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Step of the make-content playbook: mines one finished asset into scored quotable units and maps a different lead unit to each platform. Run make-content instead; not for direct use.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Trending
Quiet since March.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- gooseworks-ai/goose-skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Who's talking about athina-ai/goose-skills
The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- gooseworks-ai/goose-skills★ 1.3k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository180 other files it gives its agents.
- goose-adsSkill
- goose-product-photosSkill
- goose-video-localSkill
- goose-videoSkill
- gooseworksSkill
- make-custom-videoSkill
- ad-policy-checkSkill
- analyze-performance-call-and-learnSkill
- analyze-performance-diagnoseSkill
- analyze-performance-intakeSkill
- analyze-performance-rank-and-readSkill
- analyze-performance-revenue-joinSkill
- analyze-performanceSkill
- claims-gateSkill
- email-lifecycle-broadcast-plannerSkill
- email-lifecycle-flow-writerSkill
- email-lifecycle-lifecycle-auditSkill
- email-lifecycle-offer-mathSkill
- email-lifecycle-send-checkSkill
- email-lifecycleSkill
- honest-reviewSkill
- improve-search-visibility-citation-checkSkill
- improve-search-visibility-entity-footprintSkill
- improve-search-visibility-fix-writerSkill
- improve-search-visibility-page-and-foundation-checkSkill
- improve-search-visibility-question-setSkill
- improve-search-visibilitySkill
- improve-search-visibility-store-listing-auditSkill
- make-content-content-briefSkill
- make-contentSkill
- make-content-two-pass-editSkill
- make-static-ads-ad-copySkill
- make-static-ads-claims-extractSkill
- make-static-ads-composeSkill
- make-static-ads-concept-gridSkill
- make-static-ads-copy-variantsSkill
- make-static-ads-find-referencesSkill
- make-static-ads-fix-rejectedSkill
- make-static-ads-graphic-requestSkill
- make-static-ads-render-reviewSkill
- make-static-adsSkill
- marketing-data-accessSkill
- marketing-guideSkill
- outcomes-ledgerSkill
- plan-campaign-brief-and-assetsSkill
- plan-campaign-budget-and-testsSkill
- plan-campaign-channel-decisionSkill
- plan-campaign-goal-chainSkill
- plan-campaignSkill
- research-audience-account-sourcingSkill
- research-audience-fit-definitionSkill
- research-audience-people-and-contactsSkill
- research-audience-score-segment-qaSkill
- research-audience-segment-passSkill
- research-audience-signals-and-hooksSkill
- research-audienceSkill
- research-competitors-category-passSkill
- research-competitors-edge-casesSkill
- research-competitors-rival-passSkill
- research-competitorsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Source to units
Input: the full text or transcript of one finished asset (../make-content/references/repurposing.md §1 says how to get it in). Read it completely before mining. Never mine from a summary.
Output table
Source: <title> · <link or media_asset_id> · <length/duration>
| # | Type | Anchor (verbatim, ≤25 words) | Where (timestamp / ¶) | Alone | Charge | Novel | Proof | Total | Best homes |
|---|------|------------------------------|-----------------------|-------|--------|-------|-------|-------|------------|- Type: claim · contrarian take · story · stat · quote · framework/steps · mistake+fix · before/after · objection+answer · audience Q · demo moment.
- Scores (1–3):
- Alone: makes sense without the rest of the source.
- Charge: surprise, tension, humour or stakes.
- Novel: says what competitors don't.
- Proof: 3 if an approved claim or a real number in the source backs it; 1 if it is opinion only. Opinion is fine for a contrarian take, but it must be the speaker's.
- Mine 15–30 units from a long source and 5–10 from a short one. Drop units scoring ≤6.
- A short or silent clip (a 10–30s product video, often with an empty transcript) holds 2–4 units: its caption, its on-screen text, and what the scenes show (
media_analyzegivesvisible_textand the scene descriptions). Say so plainly: it supports 2–3 versions at most, not "every platform". Ask whether a longer asset exists (a founder interview, a webinar, an article) before stretching a thin source into filler. - A stat in the source is still a claim. If it is about the brand and not on the approved list, keep the unit but mark "stat needs approval". The claims check will cut or soften it.
- Spoken quotes stay verbatim, attributed to the speaker as named in the source. Never tidy a quote. On-screen text that came from OCR (
visible_text) is text, not a quote: fix obvious OCR errors and never put it in quote marks. - Sources under ~30s: rank the units instead of applying the ≤6 cut-off, and keep the top 2–4. If fewer than 3 units score 7 or more, recommend a richer asset before writing, naming one from the brand's own posts if you can (e.g. one with speech). Then let the human choose.
Then map
For each platform the brand uses, pick the lead unit by the map in ../make-content/references/repurposing.md §3. No two versions share a lead unit. When strong units outnumber platforms, a platform can take two surfaces (e.g. carousel + Reel). If the source has fewer strong units than the brand has platforms, say so and make fewer, better versions rather than filler.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

