agentleFS
ataidecarlosataidecarlos/agentic/skills/karpathy-guidelines/SKILL.md

karpathy-guidelines

Skill0 starsChanged 26 days agoUnlicenseView on GitHub

Behavioral guidelines for planning, writing, and reviewing code. Load at session start when doing any code work. Highest priority: Goal-Driven Execution — transform tasks into verifiable goals with success criteria and loop until verified. Also covers: Think Before Coding (surface assumptions, push back when warranted), Simplicity First (minimum code, no speculation), and Surgical Changes (touch only what you must).

126 other projects use a version of this, 112 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use huashu-design, github-cli and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • XIYBHKSkill

    huashu-design

    花叔Design(Huashu-Design)——用HTML做高保真原型、交互Demo、幻灯片、动画、设计变体探索+设计方向顾问+专家评审的一体化设计能力。HTML是工具不是媒介,根据任务embody不同专家(UX设计师/动画师/幻灯片设计师/原型师),避免web design tropes。触发词:做原型、设计Demo、交互原型、HTML演示、动画Demo、设计变体、hi-fi设计、UI mockup、prototype、设计探索、做个HTML页面、做个可视化、app原型、iOS原型、移动应用mockup、导出MP4、导出GIF、60fps视频、设计风格、设计方向、设计哲学、配色方案、视觉风格、推荐风格、选个风格、做个好看的、评审、好不好看、review this design。**主干能力**:Junior Designer工作流(先给假设+reasoning+placeholder再迭代)、反AI slop清单、React+Babel最佳实践、Tweaks变体切换、Speaker Notes演示、Starter Components(幻灯片外壳/变体画布/动画引擎/设备边框)、App原型专属守则(默认从Wikimedia/Met/Unsplash取真图、每台iPhone包AppPhone状态管理器可交互、交付前跑Playwright点击测试)、Playwright验证、HTML动画→MP4/GIF视频导出(25fps基础 + 60fps插帧 + palette优化GIF + 6首场景化BGM + 自动fade)。**需求模糊时的Fallback**:设计方向顾问模式——从5流派×20种设计哲学(Pentagram信息建筑/Field.io运动诗学/Kenya Hara东方极简/Sagmeister实验先锋等)推荐3个差异化方向,展示24个预制showcase(8场景×3风格),并行生成3个视觉Demo让用户选。**交付后可选**:专家级5维度评审(哲学一致性/视觉层级/细节执行/功能性/创新性各打10分+修复清单)。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • rogue-dev-studioSkill

    github-cli

    GitHub CLI authentication and workflow configuration. Use when the project needs this capability or the user / team manifest asks for it. Use for specialized `github-cli` work when listed in TEAM.yaml or explicitly requested.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • seikaikyoSkill

    banner-design

    Design banners for social media, ads, website heroes, creative assets, and print. Multiple art direction options with optional generated or supplied visuals. Actions: design, create, generate banner. Platforms: Facebook, Twitter/X, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, Google Display, website hero, print. Styles: minimalist, gradient, bold typography, photo-based, illustrated, geometric, retro, glassmorphism, 3D, neon, duotone, editorial, collage.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    using-superpowers

    Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    ponytail

    Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • LLl0k0laDSkill

    idea-refine

    Refine ideas through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use "idea-refine" or "ideate" to trigger.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. 14 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 14

    Common

    Most of the 122 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.

    line 36
  2. Common:

    If a simpler approach exists, say so.

    line 37
  3. Common:

    If something is unclear, stop.

    line 38
  4. Common:

    No features beyond what was asked.

    line 44
  5. Common:

    No abstractions for single-use code.

    line 45
  6. Common:

    No error handling for impossible scenarios.

    line 47
  7. Common:

    If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

    line 48
  8. Common:

    Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

    line 50
  9. Common:

    When editing existing code:

    line 56
  10. Common:

    Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.

    line 57
  11. Common:

    Don't refactor things that aren't broken.

    line 58
  12. Common:

    If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

    line 60
  13. Common:

    When your changes create orphans:

    line 62
  14. Very specific:

    Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.

    line 63
  15. Common:

    Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

    line 64

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 122 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Karpathy Guidelines

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

1. Goal-Driven Execution (highest priority)

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.

2. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
  • If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

3. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

4. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.


These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.