agentleFS
asta-nguyenasta-nguyen/agent-devkit/skills/lean-audit/SKILL.md

lean-audit

Skill4 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user asks to audit a whole repository for over-engineering, code bloat, unnecessary dependencies, speculative abstractions, or what can be deleted or simplified.

3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run a read-only whole-repo simplicity audit.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Use for audits of over-engineering, bloat, or simplification.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not use for diff-only review, correctness, security, performance, generic test coverage, or style.

    line 16
  4. Very specific:

    If a required area or repository-wide search is unavailable, report Audit incomplete: <specific limitation> and do not make a lean verdict.

    line 25
  5. Very specific:

    Every finding needs an exact repository-relative path:line, evidence, and a replacement.

    line 51

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Lean Audit

Overview

Run a read-only whole-repo simplicity audit. Report validated cuts; do not edit, delete, commit, open a PR, or post comments.

When to use

Use for audits of over-engineering, bloat, or simplification. Do not use for diff-only review, correctness, security, performance, generic test coverage, or style; route those concerns to review or debugging.

Process

  1. Establish root. Read applicable instructions and inspect git status without changing it. Record root, exclusions (.git, generated output, vendored code, node_modules, and build caches), and every inspected first-party area. If the user explicitly includes an excluded path, state that override. If a required area or repository-wide search is unavailable, report Audit incomplete: <specific limitation> and do not make a lean verdict.
  2. Inventory source, structure, entrypoints, manifests, dependencies, configuration, commands, and tests. Use rg and direct reads. Before judging a candidate, use FFF multi-pattern grep (fallback: rg) to search callers, registrations, and dynamic-reference variants, then inspect relevant configuration, tests, and extension requirements.
  3. Report only validated cuts with one of these tags: delete, stdlib, native, yagni, or shrink. Omit ambiguous candidates. Preserve explicit requirements, repository conventions, compatibility boundaries, required validation, and behavior-protecting tests. Route out-of-scope concerns to review/debugging.
  4. Rank the largest credible cut first. Report savings only when supported; never imply that a change was applied.

Output

# Lean audit
Scope: <repository root>; exclusions: <paths>; inspected: <first-party areas>

1. delete: <path:line> <cut>. <replacement>. evidence: <paths/searches>

net: -<N> lines, -<M> dependencies possible.

Every finding needs an exact repository-relative path:line, evidence, and a replacement. For shrink, show the shorter equivalent form. After complete coverage with no validated cut, keep the header and scope, then output Lean already. Ship. and omit findings and net. If coverage is incomplete, output the limitation instead. End with the Next: block from using-devkit (Next: none after a complete report).

Quick reference

TagMeaning
deleteRemove code or a dependency with no required use.
stdlibReplace custom behavior with a standard-library API.
nativeReplace custom machinery with a platform-native feature.
yagniRemove speculative or unused abstraction.
shrinkKeep behavior while making code materially smaller.

Example

src/format.js:18 — stdlib: replace the hand-written extension parser with node:path.extname; evidence: callers and tests cover the same input boundary.

Common mistakes

  • Calling a style preference bloat without behavior or reuse evidence.
  • Calling code dead after checking only one direct occurrence.
  • Removing a factory or validation despite an explicit extension contract.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.