graphql-security
Skill2 starsChanged 49 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audits GraphQL APIs for security misconfiguration and abuse — introspection/GraphiQL/playground exposed in production, missing query depth and complexity limits, resolver-level authorization gaps and IDOR, error/stacktrace/field-suggestion leakage, query-batching abuse, CSRF with cookie auth, and unbounded custom scalars. Covers Apollo, graphql-yoga, express-graphql, graphql-js, graphene/strawberry/ariadne, gqlgen, Hasura. Use when the project has a GraphQL server, .graphql schema files, or GraphQL dependencies.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- narlyseorg/superhackerstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- awarexone/AXguardtheir own version, first seen Sep 15, 2026
- deangrant/agentstheir own version, first seen Aug 16, 2026
- thejefflarson/soundchecktheir own version, first seen Jul 31, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- thejefflarson/soundcheck★ 20same name
- awarexone/AXguard★ 17same name
- narlyseorg/superhackers★ 8same name
- deangrant/agents★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- android-code-securitySkill
- auth-reviewSkill
- config-hardeningSkill
- container-iac-securitySkill
- course-platform-securitySkill
- crypto-reviewSkill
- cve-researchSkill
- data-exposureSkill
- dependency-vulnsSkill
- design-threat-reviewSkill
- django-securitySkill
- dotnet-securitySkill
- flow-securitySkill
- flutter-securitySkill
- injection-flawsSkill
- laravel-securitySkill
- llm-securitySkill
- mobile-securitySkill
- rails-securitySkill
- secrets-detectionSkill
- security-auditSkill
- skill-forgeSkill
- spring-securitySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 58
Default pagination first/last unbounded (allUsers returns everything) → Medium
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GraphQL Security
Step 0 — Detect the stack
rg --files -g '*.graphql' -g '*.graphqls' | head
rg -n "apollo-server|@apollo/server|graphql-yoga|express-graphql|mercurius|graphene|strawberry-graphql|ariadne|gqlgen|hasura" -g 'package.json' -g 'requirements*.txt' -g 'pyproject.toml' -g '*.go' -g 'docker-compose*.yml' | headRecord: server library + version, whether schema is code-first or SDL, where resolvers live, how auth reaches context (header token vs session cookie).
Step 1 — Server configuration checks
Per-framework config locations: references/frameworks.md. Checks and default
severities (adjust with context):
| Check | Finding if present/absent | Severity |
| Introspection enabled in prod config | full attack-surface disclosure | Medium (High if admin/internal types visible) |
| GraphiQL / Playground / Apollo Sandbox reachable in prod | interactive query console for attackers | Medium |
| No query depth or complexity limit | nested-query DoS ({a{b{c{...}}}} bombs) | High |
formatError returns originalError/stacktrace; Apollo includeStacktraceInErrorResponses/debug on | internal error leakage | Medium |
| Field suggestions not masked in prod ("Did you mean..." hints) | schema oracle for attackers | Low/Medium |
Query batching enabled unbounded (shouldBatch, array bodies) | auth-brute-force in one request | Medium |
Aliasing amplification — no cost/depth limit while the schema allows repeated aliases ({a: user(id:1) b: user(id:2) ...} x N in one query) | batching DoS + brute-force vector bypassing rate limits | Medium/High |
Cookie-session auth + no CSRF protection (Apollo v4 csrfPrevention: false/absent) | cross-site mutation execution | High |
| Mutations accepted over GET (express-graphql) | CSRF + logging of creds in URLs | High |
| No persisted operations / allowlist for public clients | arbitrary query crafting | Low (note) |
Step 2 — Resolver authorization (the #1 GraphQL bug source)
rg -n "Query:|Mutation:|Subscription:|resolve\(|fieldResolver|@auth|@hasRole|context\.user|ctx\.user" --type js --type ts --type py --type go | head -40For every resolver returning or mutating objects:
- Field-level authz missing:
User.passwordHash,User.email, admin/internal types returned to unauthenticated callers → HIGH (CRITICAL for credentials/PII) - IDOR:
user(id)resolved without ownership/scope check → same class as REST IDOR, HIGH - Subscription auth:
subscribehandlers skipping auth → Medium/High - Trust of client args:
role,isAdmin,price,userIdtaken from args without server-side derivation → HIGH
Step 3 — Schema & input review
rg -n -i "admin|secret|token|impersonate|delete|export|password" -g '*.graphql' -g '*.graphqls' | head -30- Sensitive-named types/mutations without a guard (directive or resolver check) → flag per Step 2
- Custom scalars without
validation(unboundedInt/Stringinto loops/DBLIMIT) → Medium - Login/reset/signup mutations without rate limiting (GraphQL bypasses REST limiters!) → High
- Default pagination
first/lastunbounded (allUsersreturns everything) → Medium
Reporting
Evidence = config lines + resolver code + schema lines. Fixes are one-liners in
most frameworks — give the exact snippet from references/frameworks.md
(introspection: false, validationRules: [depthLimit(10)], csrfPrevention: true,
masked formatError). Note positives (allowlists, persisted queries, field-level directives).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

