design-first
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Produce a concrete implementation design from repository evidence before changing code. Use before making any code change unless a concrete and unambiguous implementation design is provided.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ainurdev/mystical-assistanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- techygarg/latticetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- getsentry/sentry-darttheir own version, first seen Oct 12, 2026
- getsentry/sentry-react-nativetheir own version, first seen Sep 2, 2026
- valsecchi75/project-scaffoldertheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- getsentry/sentry-react-native★ 1.8ksame name
- getsentry/sentry-dart★ 878same name
- techygarg/lattice★ 209same name
- valsecchi75/project-scaffolder★ 9same name
- ainurdev/mystical-assistant★ 7same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- build-incrementalSkill
- code-simplifySkill
- create-or-clone-repositorySkill
- implementation-workflowSkill
- manage-git-worktreesSkill
- plan-driven-developmentSkill
- setup-wiki-backed-project-skillsSkill
- subagent-supervisionSkill
- task-briefSkill
- test-driven-debugSkill
- tidy-firstSkill
- write-personal-wikiSkill
- write-project-wikiSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Do not implement the change while using this skill.
- Distinctive: line 13
Read the code and other repository evidence relevant to the requested change.
- Distinctive: line 25
Start with cohesive implementation units.
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not add fallback behavior, broad input handling, or unused flexibility that the request does not require.
- Distinctive: line 27
Use clear errors for unsupported or unexpected states instead of guessing or silently continuing.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Design First
Inspect the existing implementation and produce a concrete design before changing the code. Do not implement the change while using this skill.
Workflow
- Read the code and other repository evidence relevant to the requested change.
- Identify the behavior to change and the behavior to preserve.
- Define the concrete code scope and implementation design.
- Review the design against the requested behavior, existing contracts, and design principles. Simplify or revise it before finalizing.
- Define how the changed and preserved behavior will be verified.
- Record or return the design as directed by the caller.
Design Principles
- Design the change to fit the existing implementation. Prefer direct local structural improvement over side paths, adapters, or compatibility layers.
- Identify any small behavior-preserving tidy that should precede implementation, and keep it distinct from the behavior change.
- Start with cohesive implementation units; extract functions or classes only when the responsibility is worth naming.
- Do not add fallback behavior, broad input handling, or unused flexibility that the request does not require.
- Use clear errors for unsupported or unexpected states instead of guessing or silently continuing.
Design Information
The design should include:
- Behavior
- What should change.
- What should be preserved.
- Code Scope
- The file paths, classes, functions, and modules to change or add.
- Material interfaces and dependencies.
- High-level pseudocode only when it helps clarify a non-obvious design.
- Flow
- Include a short flow only when branching or data movement would otherwise be unclear.
- Verification
- Define verification that demonstrates both changed and preserved behavior.
- Assumptions and Open Questions
- Include only unresolved items that materially affect implementation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

