latex-thesis-zh
Skill4 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Chinese LaTeX thesis assistant for existing .tex degree thesis projects (XeLaTeX/LuaLaTeX/latexmk). Use this skill whenever a user works on a Chinese master's or doctoral thesis needing compilation, GB/T 7714 bibliography checks, chapter structure mapping, template detection (thuthesis, pkuthss), terminology consistency, logic coherence review, heading lead-in checks, title optimization, de-AI editing, or experiment chapter review. Trigger even for single issues like "帮我编译论文", "检查国标格式", "看看绪论逻辑", "毕业论文", "学位论文", or "硕士/博士论文".
2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dongzhigang13305312738-art/paper-skillsedited, first seen Jul 21, 2026
- Jay-Chen79/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 2, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- dongzhigang13305312738-art/paper-skills★ 123% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- Jay-Chen79/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptSkill
- animateSkill
- arrangeSkill
- auditSkill
- bolderSkill
- clarifySkill
- code-refactorSkill
- colorizeSkill
- critiqueSkill
- delightSkill
- distillSkill
- extractSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gitlab-integrationSkill
- git-operationsSkill
- hardenSkill
- industrial-ai-researchSkill
- latex-paper-enSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- normalizeSkill
- onboardSkill
- optimizeSkill
- overdriveSkill
- paper-auditSkill
- polishSkill
- pydanticSkill
- python-best-practicesSkill
- python-docsSkill
- pytorch-lightningSkill
- quieterSkill
- remotion-best-practicesSkill
- research-paper-writingSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- teach-impeccableSkill
- typesetSkill
- typst-paperSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 82
Read the one reference file tied to that module (see "Read next" column).
- Very specific: line 83
Run the corresponding script with uv run python ....
- Very specific: line 85
If template and structure are both unclear, run template first, then structure.
- Distinctive: line 89
Never fabricate citations, funding statements, acknowledgements, or academic claims.
- Very specific: line 90
Never rewrite \cite{}, \ref{}, \label{}, math blocks, or bibliography keys unless explicitly asked.
- Distinctive: line 91
Treat title suggestions, de-AI revisions, and logic comments as proposals.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
LaTeX 中文学位论文助手
使用此 skill 处理已有中文 LaTeX 学位论文项目中的定向问题。保持低摩擦:先判断最小匹配模块,再运行对应脚本,最后以论文审阅友好的格式返回问题和建议。
Capability Summary
- 编译并诊断 XeLaTeX / LuaLaTeX / latexmk 构建问题。
- 检查论文格式、GB/T 7714 相关要求、章节结构、模板类型和术语一致性。
- 审阅逻辑连贯性、文献综述质量、章节/小节/四级标题导语完整性、实验章节写法、标题表达与 AI 痕迹。
- 在不破坏引用、标签和数学环境的前提下给出可落地的中文论文修改建议。
Triggering
当用户拥有一个现有中文 .tex 学位论文项目,并希望你帮助处理以下任务时使用本 skill:
- 编译失败或工具链不确定
- 学位论文格式、国标或学校模板检查
- 章节结构梳理或模板识别
- 术语、缩略语、命名一致性检查
- 逻辑连贯性、文献综述质量、标题后导语完整性、跨章节闭合检查
- 标题优化、学术表达或去 AI 化检查
- 实验章节语言与结构审阅
即使用户只提到单一问题,例如“帮我判断是不是 thuthesis”“检查绪论逻辑”或“按 GB/T 7714 看参考文献”,也应触发本 skill。
Do Not Use
不要将此 skill 用于:
- 英文会议或期刊论文
- Typst 项目
- 仅有 DOCX/PDF、没有 LaTeX 源文件的场景
- 纯文献调研、没有学位论文工程的任务
- 从零写一篇学位论文
- 多维度审稿、评分或投稿门控检查(使用
paper-audit) - 英文会议/期刊论文编辑(使用
latex-paper-en)
Module Router
| Module | Use when | Primary command | Read next |
compile | Thesis build fails or toolchain is unclear | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/compile.py main.tex | references/modules/COMPILE.md |
format | User asks about thesis formatting or GB/T 7714 layout | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/check_format.py main.tex | references/modules/FORMAT.md |
structure | Need chapter/section map or thesis skeleton overview | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/map_structure.py main.tex | references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md |
consistency | Terms, abbreviations, or naming drift across chapters | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/check_consistency.py main.tex --terms | references/modules/CONSISTENCY.md |
template | Need to identify or validate thesis class/template | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/detect_template.py main.tex | references/modules/TEMPLATE.md |
bibliography | GB/T 7714 or BibTeX validation | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/verify_bib.py references.bib --standard gb7714 | references/modules/BIBLIOGRAPHY.md |
title | Optimize Chinese thesis titles and chapter titles | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/optimize_title.py main.tex --check | references/modules/TITLE.md |
deai | Reduce AI-writing traces in visible Chinese prose | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/deai_check.py main.tex --section introduction | references/modules/DEAI.md |
logic | Check logical coherence, introduction funnel, heading lead-ins, lit review quality, chapter mainline, and cross-section closure | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/analyze_logic.py main.tex --section related | references/modules/LOGIC.md |
experiment | Review experiment chapter language, discussion layering, and conclusion completeness | uv run python $SKILL_DIR/scripts/analyze_experiment.py main.tex --section experiments | references/modules/EXPERIMENT.md |
Required Inputs
- 论文入口文件,例如
main.tex。 - 可选
--section SECTION,当用户只关注某一章或某一节。 - 可选 bibliography 路径,当任务聚焦参考文献。
- 可选学校/模板上下文,当用户关心
thuthesis、pkuthss或特定高校要求。
如果参数不完整,只追问入口 .tex 文件和目标模块,不额外扩展问题。
Output Contract
- 尽量使用 LaTeX 友好的审阅格式返回问题:
% MODULE (L##) [Severity] [Priority]: ... - 明确给出执行的命令;若脚本失败,必须报告退出码和关键 stderr。
- 将“检查结果”和“建议改写”分开陈述,避免把脚本诊断和正文润色混在一起。
- 默认保留
\cite{}、\ref{}、\label{}、数学环境、参考文献键和模板宏命令。
Workflow
- Parse
$ARGUMENTSfor entry file and module. If missing, ask for the thesis.texentry file and target module. - Read the one reference file tied to that module (see "Read next" column).
- Run the corresponding script with
uv run python .... - Return findings as
% Module (L##) [Severity] [Priority]: .... Report exact command and exit code on failure. - If template and structure are both unclear, run
templatefirst, thenstructure.
Safety Boundaries
- Never fabricate citations, funding statements, acknowledgements, or academic claims.
- Never rewrite
\cite{},\ref{},\label{}, math blocks, or bibliography keys unless explicitly asked. - Treat title suggestions, de-AI revisions, and logic comments as proposals; keep source-preserving checks separate from edits.
Reference Map
references/COMPILATION.md: compilation strategy and toolchain diagnosis.references/GB_STANDARD.md: GB/T 7714 and bibliography-related checks.references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md: thesis structure expectations and chapter mapping.references/LOGIC_COHERENCE.md: logic, coherence, heading lead-ins, consistency, and literature-review expectations.references/TITLE_OPTIMIZATION.md: Chinese academic title heuristics.references/DEAI_GUIDE.md: de-AI review heuristics.references/modules/EXPERIMENT.md: experiment-chapter review criteria.references/UNIVERSITIES/: school/template-specific constraints after template detection.
只读取当前模块所需的参考文件,避免一次加载整套指南。
Example Requests
- “帮我定位这个中文学位论文
main.tex为什么 XeLaTeX 一直编译失败,并判断是不是 thuthesis 模板。” - “请梳理这篇硕士论文的章节结构,并检查术语和缩略语是否前后统一。”
- “按 GB/T 7714 帮我检查参考文献,再看看绪论是不是有明显 AI 腔。”
- “检查 related work 的逻辑链条和研究空白推导,但不要动任何引用和公式。”
- “帮我检查每一章、每一节、四级标题后有没有先写导语,不要只看格式。”
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

