token-mapping
Skill281 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use to report how hardcoded style values on a page, file or diff map onto a project's existing design tokens, such as "are we using our tokens here", "which hardcoded colors map to which tokens", a token audit or planning a token migration. It never edits. Replacing the values is build-design-system.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- arla6ka/skillsword for word, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- arla6ka/skills★ 281100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- build-design-systemSkill
- component-docsSkill
- design-system-bossSkill
- migrate-design-systemSkill
- ui-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Resolve: Follow every alias to its final value in each mode.
- Very specific: line 21
Count and close: When gaps are over 30% of rows and number 12 or more, the list is usually the wrong one.
- Very specific: line 41
Every row has a job, a class and a reason.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Token mapping
A read-only report that lands raw values (hex, px, shadows) on a token list someone else owns. Classes, normalising and tolerances are in references/mapping-rules.md. "Check the tokens on the settings page" is enough of an ask. Find the values and the list yourself.
Steps
- Find the list. Token files, theme entries, custom properties on
:root, a component library's variable pairs. A framework's default theme is not the team's list, and neither is a public system's (Geist's names never stand in for the team's). Record its name, location and how you read it. If a read fails, say so and stop. Never fill a list from memory. - Find the values. What the person named, else the branch diff, else the product code. Record each with its file, line, property and job.
- Resolve. Follow every alias to its final value in each mode. Write down every disagreement between two sources.
- Normalise both sides (lengths to px, colours to OKLCH compared by delta E OK) with code, never by eye.
- Classify each row once per mode. Purpose first, then value.
- Exact: the token's stated job covers the row and the values match.
- Semantic: the job covers it and the value is inside tolerance. State the difference in numbers.
- Ambiguous: two or more tokens fit and nothing picks one. Name every candidate.
- Gap: no token's job covers it, or the only fitting token is out of tolerance. A gap never gets a new name.
- Count and close. When gaps are over 30% of rows and number 12 or more, the list is usually the wrong one. Say so, still deliver the table, and lead with
Status: not actionable (gap threshold).
Report
Summary, Mapping, Do not use (a token whose value matches but whose job differs), Ambiguous, Gaps, For a person to decide, Source. Last line Coverage: with what was scanned and what was not. Run on its own, the chat reply gives the answer with its numbers and one prompt the person can paste to take the next step.
Rules
- A match on value before purpose is wrong. Wrong:
#6b7280mapped tocolor.border.defaultbecause the hex is equal. Right: it is text, so the candidates are text tokens, and the border token goes in Do not use. - A semantic token wins over the primitive it aliases. Map to a primitive only when no semantic token covers the job, and say so.
- A palette class (
text-gray-500) names a value and no job. It gets a row, counted apart from raw values. - Anything inferred rather than read, such as a job taken from a class name, is marked inferred.
- Counts carry their unit: occurrences, lines or mapping rows.
Stops
Stop and report on these only. No list exists. One name has two values in the same mode. Two sources disagree and no project rule says which wins (report both). Return what stopped it, the groundwork so far, and the shortest message that unblocks it, such as "Paste tokens.json or give its path."
Done
Every row has a job, a class and a reason. Every ambiguous row names two or more candidates. Nothing in the repo changed (git status is the same before and after). The last line reads Coverage:.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

