audit-fix
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Address findings from a completed app-audit run, in safe order, with per-fix verification. Use whenever the user asks to fix the audit findings, address them, work through them, or run audit-fix. Reads AUDIT_LOG.md; uses cartographer's call graph (stage 4) to order fixes by blast radius — pure-local first, large-blast-radius last, critical severity prioritized within each tier. Runs pre-commit-verification after each fix; reverts and stops on failure. Every fix is graded with a 0–1 truth score against an environment threshold (dev 0.90 / PR 0.95 / release 0.99) — below threshold, evidence is strengthened or the fix rolls back. Proof-tests are authored blind (from the finding + spec, never the fix diff). PR-scoped runs isolate fixes in a git worktree and use Conventional Commits. Closes with a tamper-proof clean-room re-run in a fresh worktree. Refreshes cartographer and re-runs app-audit on the full original scope when done.
- Reads credentials
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- buildomator/buildomatortheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- xiaolai/cc-suitetheir own version, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- trebaud/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 18, 2026
- jelbirt/LLM-Skill-Buildtheir own version, first seen Aug 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use audit.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tool★ 432same name
- ansvisor/ansvisor★ 233same name
- buildomator/buildomator★ 102same name
- xiaolai/cc-suite★ 56same name
- mkSteady/mkSkills★ 9same name
- jelbirt/LLM-Skill-Build★ 1same name
- trebaud/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- app-auditSkill
- cartographerSkill
- pre-commit-verificationSkill
- spec-bootstrapSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
31 rules. 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
20
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

