agentleFS
apourmd941apourmd941/selran-devloop/skills/audit-fix/SKILL.md

audit-fix

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Address findings from a completed app-audit run, in safe order, with per-fix verification. Use whenever the user asks to fix the audit findings, address them, work through them, or run audit-fix. Reads AUDIT_LOG.md; uses cartographer's call graph (stage 4) to order fixes by blast radius — pure-local first, large-blast-radius last, critical severity prioritized within each tier. Runs pre-commit-verification after each fix; reverts and stops on failure. Every fix is graded with a 0–1 truth score against an environment threshold (dev 0.90 / PR 0.95 / release 0.99) — below threshold, evidence is strengthened or the fix rolls back. Proof-tests are authored blind (from the finding + spec, never the fix diff). PR-scoped runs isolate fixes in a git worktree and use Conventional Commits. Closes with a tamper-proof clean-room re-run in a fresh worktree. Refreshes cartographer and re-runs app-audit on the full original scope when done.

  • Reads credentials

7 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use audit.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • OpenAISkill

    audit

    Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

31 rules. 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 20

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 11

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.