agentleFS
apinizerapinizer/agentnizer-cookbook/.claude/skills/verify/SKILL.md

verify

Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Lightweight self-check — runs each touched module's lint/build commands as configured in its profile YAML. Not a full review; just "did I break something obvious?

189 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-import

    Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AviadPSkill

    risk-assess

    Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • diego-tobalinaSkill

    build-fix

    Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • AaravChadhaSkill

    secure

    Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • +1 more from TheKREATORS

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run the lint: command (if present).

    line 29
  2. Very specific:

    Run the build: command — only if quick_build: true is set in the profile (otherwise skipped, since builds can be slow).

    line 30
  3. Very specific:

    If a changed file matches no profile, /verify reports "unknown module" for that file (so you don't silently skip it).

    line 46
  4. Very specific:

    If you'd like the team to fix the lint errors instead of you, run /start "fix lint errors in <module>: <paste of failures>" — the planner …

    line 74

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/verify — Quick self-check

A pre-flight: lint + (optionally) build the modules whose files you've changed, before handing them to the pipeline. Catches obvious syntax / typecheck / lint errors in seconds rather than minutes-into-review.

This is not the code review. The actual review happens inside the pipeline (review-correctness + review-convention + review-quality + tester). /verify is just the developer's local sanity check.

Usage

/verify                  # auto-detect modules from `git diff --name-only`
/verify <module>         # check one specific module
/verify <m1> <m2>        # check several at once

What it does

For each module to check:

  1. Read .claude/profiles/<module>.yaml.
  2. Run the lint: command (if present).
  3. Run the build: command — only if quick_build: true is set in the profile (otherwise skipped, since builds can be slow).
  4. Capture stdout / stderr / exit code per module.
  5. Report PASS / FAIL per module with a per-finding breakdown when FAIL.

Module detection

git diff --name-only is mapped against each profile's paths patterns:

# .claude/profiles/<module>.yaml
paths:
  - "apps/<module>/**"
  - "libs/<module>/**"

If a changed file matches no profile, /verify reports "unknown module" for that file (so you don't silently skip it). If a file matches multiple profiles, the more specific path pattern wins (longest path-prefix match).

Output

VERIFY REPORT
=============
Time: 2026-04-27T14:32:00Z
Detected modules: shared, worker, frontend

[PASS] shared       — lint OK (3.2s)
[PASS] worker       — lint OK (5.1s)
[FAIL] frontend     — lint: 3 errors, 2 warnings (4.7s)
       <file>:<line>:<col> — <rule> — <message>
       <file>:<line>:<col> — <rule> — <message>
       <file>:<line>:<col> — <rule> — <message>

Total: 2 PASS, 1 FAIL — 12.9s

On FAIL

/verify lists the linter's errors verbatim. It does not offer to fix them — that's the developer's job (or the developer agent's, when the pipeline runs). /verify is a check, not a fixer.

If you'd like the team to fix the lint errors instead of you, run /start "fix lint errors in <module>: <paste of failures>" — the planner detects the bug shape from the phrasing and routes through the pipeline.

Common scenarios

ScenarioWhat to expect
/verify with no changes"No changed files detected. Nothing to verify."
/verify and one of the changed files matches no profileReports the file with [?] no profile matched — you should add or extend a profile's paths
Profile has lint: but command isn't installed[FAIL] <module> with stderr showing the not-found error — install the tool
quick_build: true and build is slowVerify takes longer; if too slow, set quick_build: false

What it does NOT do

  • ❌ Run the test suite (that's the tester agent's job in the pipeline)
  • ❌ Spawn any agent
  • ❌ Touch .state/
  • ❌ Modify any file
  • ❌ Auto-fix lint findings

Notes

We use /verify as a pre-team.sh start sanity check after manual edits. If your manual change has an obvious lint or syntax error, catching it here saves the developer agent from wasting a retry cycle on something you already know is broken.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.