agentleFS
apifyapify/apify-deepseek-harness-plugin/skills/apify-generate-output-schema/SKILL.md

apify-generate-output-schema

Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Generate output schemas (dataset_schema.json, output_schema.json, key_value_store_schema.json) for an Apify Actor by analyzing its source code. Use when creating or updating Actor output schemas.

5 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

27 rules. 14 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 12 are very specific to this project.

  • 14

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 12

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Analyze code first: Read the Actor's source to understand what data it actually pushes to the dataset — never guess

    line 12
  2. Common:

    Anonymize examples: Never use real user IDs, usernames, or personal data in examples

    line 14
  3. Common:

    Verify against code: If TypeScript types exist, cross-check the schema against both the type definition AND the code that produces the …

    line 15
  4. Common:

    Reuse existing patterns: Before generating schemas, check if other Actors in the same repository already have output schemas — match their …

    line 16
  5. Distinctive:

    Use the user's most recent request as the scope for this skill (which Actor to target, which subdirectory, any specific fields to focus on).

    line 25
  6. Common:

    Create todo list with all phases

    line 28
  7. Very specific:

    Read actor.json to understand the Actor's configuration

    line 30
  8. Very specific:

    Check if dataset_schema.json, output_schema.json, and key_value_store_schema.json already exist

    line 31
  9. Very specific:

    Search for existing schemas in the repository: Look for other .actor/ directories or schema files (e.g., /dataset_schema.json, …

    line 32
  10. Very specific:

    JavaScript/TypeScript: Search for Actor.pushData(, dataset.pushData(, Dataset.pushData(

    line 34
  11. Very specific:

    Python: Search for Actor.push_data(, dataset.push_data(, Dataset.push_data(

    line 35
  12. Very specific:

    TypeScript: Look for output type interfaces/types (e.g., in src/types/, src/types/output.ts).

    line 40
  13. Common:

    Python: Look for TypedDict, dataclass, or Pydantic model definitions.

    line 41
  14. Common:

    Check for existing shared schema utilities or helper functions in the codebase that handle schema generation or validation — reuse them …

    line 42
  15. Very specific:

    If inline storages.dataset or storages.keyValueStore config exists in actor.json, note it for migration

    line 43
  16. Common:

    Goal: Create a complete dataset schema with field definitions and display views

    line 51
  17. Common:

    If existing output schemas were found in the repository during Phase 1 (step 5), follow their conventions:

    line 90
  18. Common:

    When the Actor code already has well-defined TypeScript interfaces or Python type classes, derive fields directly from those types rather …

    line 97
  19. Common:

    Use realistic but generic values.

    line 198
  20. Common:

    Goal: Create the output schema that tells Apify Console where to find results

    line 308
  21. Very specific:

    If key_value_store_schema.json was generated in Phase 3, add a second property:

    line 330
  22. Very specific:

    Read the current actor.json

    line 358
  23. Very specific:

    Add or update the storages.dataset reference:

    line 359
  24. Very specific:

    If key_value_store_schema.json was generated, add the reference:

    line 365
  25. Very specific:

    If actor.json had inline storages.dataset or storages.keyValueStore objects (not string paths), migrate their content into the respective …

    line 376
  26. Common:

    Goal: Ensure correctness and completeness

    line 382
  27. Common:

    Goal: Document what was created

    line 407

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Generate Actor Output Schema

You are generating output schema files for an Apify Actor. The output schema tells Apify Console how to display run results. You will analyze the Actor's source code, create dataset_schema.json, output_schema.json, and key_value_store_schema.json (if the Actor uses key-value store), and update actor.json.

Core Principles

  • Analyze code first: Read the Actor's source to understand what data it actually pushes to the dataset — never guess
  • Every field is nullable: APIs and websites are unpredictable — always set "nullable": true
  • Anonymize examples: Never use real user IDs, usernames, or personal data in examples
  • Verify against code: If TypeScript types exist, cross-check the schema against both the type definition AND the code that produces the values
  • Reuse existing patterns: Before generating schemas, check if other Actors in the same repository already have output schemas — match their structure, naming conventions, description style, and formatting
  • Don't reinvent the wheel: Reuse existing type definitions, interfaces, and utilities from the codebase instead of creating duplicate definitions

Phase 1: Discover Actor Structure

Goal: Locate the Actor and understand its output

Use the user's most recent request as the scope for this skill (which Actor to target, which subdirectory, any specific fields to focus on). If the scope is unclear, ask one clarifying question before continuing.

Actions:

  1. Create todo list with all phases
  2. Find the .actor/ directory containing actor.json
  3. Read actor.json to understand the Actor's configuration
  4. Check if dataset_schema.json, output_schema.json, and key_value_store_schema.json already exist
  5. Search for existing schemas in the repository: Look for other .actor/ directories or schema files (e.g., **/dataset_schema.json, **/output_schema.json, **/key_value_store_schema.json) to learn the repo's conventions — match their description style, field naming, example formatting, and overall structure
  6. Find all places where data is pushed to the dataset:
    • JavaScript/TypeScript: Search for Actor.pushData(, dataset.pushData(, Dataset.pushData(
    • Python: Search for Actor.push_data(, dataset.push_data(, Dataset.push_data(
  7. Find all places where data is stored in the key-value store:
    • JavaScript/TypeScript: Search for Actor.setValue(, keyValueStore.setValue(, KeyValueStore.setValue(
    • Python: Search for Actor.set_value(, key_value_store.set_value(, KeyValueStore.set_value(
  8. Find output type definitions — reuse them directly instead of recreating from scratch:
    • TypeScript: Look for output type interfaces/types (e.g., in src/types/, src/types/output.ts). If an interface or type already defines the output shape, derive the schema fields from it — do not create a parallel definition
    • Python: Look for TypedDict, dataclass, or Pydantic model definitions. Use the existing field names, types, and docstrings as the source of truth
  9. Check for existing shared schema utilities or helper functions in the codebase that handle schema generation or validation — reuse them rather than creating new logic
  10. If inline storages.dataset or storages.keyValueStore config exists in actor.json, note it for migration

Present findings to user: list all discovered dataset output fields, key-value store keys, their types, and where they come from.


Phase 2: Generate dataset_schema.json

Goal: Create a complete dataset schema with field definitions and display views

File structure

{
    "actorSpecification": 1,
    "fields": {
        "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
        "type": "object",
        "properties": {
            // ALL output fields here — every field the Actor can produce,
            // not just the ones shown in the overview view
        },
        "required": [],
        "additionalProperties": true
    },
    "views": {
        "overview": {
            "title": "Overview",
            "description": "Most important fields at a glance",
            "transformation": {
                "fields": [
                    // 8-12 most important field names
                ]
            },
            "display": {
                "component": "table",
                "properties": {
                    // Display config for each overview field
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

Consistency with existing schemas

If existing output schemas were found in the repository during Phase 1 (step 5), follow their conventions:

  • Match the description writing style (sentence case vs. lowercase, period vs. no period, etc.)
  • Match the field naming convention (camelCase vs. snake_case) — this must also match the actual keys produced by the Actor code
  • Match the example value style (e.g., date formats, URL patterns, placeholder names)
  • Match the view structure (number of fields in overview, display format choices)
  • Match the JSON formatting (indentation, property ordering, spacing) — all schemas in the same repository must use identical formatting, including standalone Actors

When the Actor code already has well-defined TypeScript interfaces or Python type classes, derive fields directly from those types rather than re-analyzing pushData/push_data calls from scratch. The type definition is the canonical source.

Hard rules (no exceptions)

RuleDetail
All fields in propertiesThe fields.properties object must contain every field the Actor can output, not just the fields shown in the overview view. The views section selects a subset for display — the properties section must be the complete superset
"nullable": trueOn every field — APIs are unpredictable
"additionalProperties": trueOn the top-level fields object AND on every nested object within properties. This is the most commonly missed rule — it must appear at both levels
"required": []Always empty array — on the top-level fields object AND on every nested object within properties
Anonymized examplesNo real user IDs, usernames, or content
"type" required with "nullable"AJV rejects nullable without a type on the same field

Warning — most common mistakes:

  1. Only including fields that appear in the overview view. The fields.properties must list ALL output fields, even if they are not in the views section.
  2. Only adding "required": [] and "additionalProperties": true on nested object-type properties but forgetting them on the top-level fields object. Both levels need them.

Note: nullable is an Apify-specific extension to JSON Schema draft-07. It is intentional and correct.

Field type patterns

String field:

"title": {
    "type": "string",
    "description": "Title of the scraped item",
    "nullable": true,
    "example": "Example Item Title"
}

Number field:

"viewCount": {
    "type": "number",
    "description": "Number of views",
    "nullable": true,
    "example": 15000
}

Boolean field:

"isVerified": {
    "type": "boolean",
    "description": "Whether the account is verified",
    "nullable": true,
    "example": true
}

Array field:

"hashtags": {
    "type": "array",
    "description": "Hashtags associated with the item",
    "items": { "type": "string" },
    "nullable": true,
    "example": ["#example", "#demo"]
}

Nested object field:

"authorInfo": {
    "type": "object",
    "description": "Information about the author",
    "properties": {
        "name": { "type": "string", "nullable": true },
        "url": { "type": "string", "nullable": true }
    },
    "required": [],
    "additionalProperties": true,
    "nullable": true,
    "example": { "name": "Example Author", "url": "https://example.com/author" }
}

Enum field:

"contentType": {
    "type": "string",
    "description": "Type of content",
    "enum": ["article", "video", "image"],
    "nullable": true,
    "example": "article"
}

Union type (e.g., TypeScript ObjectType | string):

"metadata": {
    "type": ["object", "string"],
    "description": "Structured metadata object, or error string if unavailable",
    "nullable": true,
    "example": { "key": "value" }
}

Anonymized example values

Use realistic but generic values. Follow platform ID format conventions:

Field typeExample approach
IDsMatch platform format and length (e.g., 11 chars for YouTube video IDs)
Usernames"exampleuser", "sampleuser123"
Display names"Example Channel", "Sample Author"
URLsUse platform's standard URL format with fake IDs
Dates"2025-01-15T12:00:00.000Z" (ISO 8601)
Text contentGeneric descriptive text, e.g., "This is an example description."

Views section

  • transformation.fields: List 8–12 most important field names (order = column order in UI)
  • display.properties: One entry per overview field with label and format
  • Available formats: "text", "number", "date", "link", "boolean", "image", "array", "object"

Pick fields that give users the most useful at-a-glance summary of the data.


Phase 3: Generate key_value_store_schema.json (if applicable)

Goal: Define key-value store collections if the Actor stores data in the key-value store

Skip this phase if no Actor.setValue() / Actor.set_value() calls were found in Phase 1 (beyond the default INPUT key).

File structure

{
    "actorKeyValueStoreSchemaVersion": 1,
    "title": "<Descriptive title — what the key-value store contains>",
    "description": "<One sentence describing the stored data>",
    "collections": {
        "<collectionName>": {
            "title": "<Human-readable title>",
            "description": "<What this collection contains>",
            "keyPrefix": "<prefix->"
        }
    }
}

How to identify collections

Group the discovered setValue / set_value calls by key pattern:

  1. Fixed keys (e.g., "RESULTS", "summary") — use "key" (exact match)
  2. Dynamic keys with a prefix (e.g., "screenshot-${id}", f"image-{name}") — use "keyPrefix"

Each group becomes a collection.

Collection properties

PropertyRequiredDescription
titleYesShown in UI tabs
descriptionNoShown in UI tooltips
keyConditionalExact key for single-key collections (use key OR keyPrefix, not both)
keyPrefixConditionalPrefix for multi-key collections (use key OR keyPrefix, not both)
contentTypesNoRestrict allowed MIME types (e.g., ["image/jpeg"], ["application/json"])
jsonSchemaNoJSON Schema draft-07 for validating application/json content

Examples

Single file output (e.g., a report):

{
    "actorKeyValueStoreSchemaVersion": 1,
    "title": "Analysis Results",
    "description": "Key-value store containing analysis output",
    "collections": {
        "report": {
            "title": "Report",
            "description": "Final analysis report",
            "key": "REPORT",
            "contentTypes": ["application/json"]
        }
    }
}

Multiple files with prefix (e.g., screenshots):

{
    "actorKeyValueStoreSchemaVersion": 1,
    "title": "Scraped Files",
    "description": "Key-value store containing downloaded files and screenshots",
    "collections": {
        "screenshots": {
            "title": "Screenshots",
            "description": "Page screenshots captured during scraping",
            "keyPrefix": "screenshot-",
            "contentTypes": ["image/png", "image/jpeg"]
        },
        "documents": {
            "title": "Documents",
            "description": "Downloaded document files",
            "keyPrefix": "doc-",
            "contentTypes": ["application/pdf", "text/html"]
        }
    }
}

Phase 4: Generate output_schema.json

Goal: Create the output schema that tells Apify Console where to find results

For most Actors that push data to a dataset, this is a minimal file:

{
    "actorOutputSchemaVersion": 1,
    "title": "<Descriptive title — what the Actor returns>",
    "description": "<One sentence describing the output data>",
    "properties": {
        "dataset": {
            "type": "string",
            "title": "Results",
            "description": "Dataset containing all scraped data",
            "template": "{{links.apiDefaultDatasetUrl}}/items"
        }
    }
}

Critical: Each property entry must include "type": "string" — this is an Apify-specific convention. The Apify meta-validator rejects properties without it (and rejects "type": "object" — only "string" is valid here).

If key_value_store_schema.json was generated in Phase 3, add a second property:

"files": {
    "type": "string",
    "title": "Files",
    "description": "Key-value store containing downloaded files",
    "template": "{{links.apiDefaultKeyValueStoreUrl}}/keys"
}

Available template variables

  • {{links.apiDefaultDatasetUrl}} — API URL of default dataset
  • {{links.apiDefaultKeyValueStoreUrl}} — API URL of default key-value store
  • {{links.publicRunUrl}} — Public run URL
  • {{links.consoleRunUrl}} — Console run URL
  • {{links.apiRunUrl}} — API run URL
  • {{links.containerRunUrl}} — URL of webserver running inside the run
  • {{run.defaultDatasetId}} — ID of the default dataset
  • {{run.defaultKeyValueStoreId}} — ID of the default key-value store

Phase 5: Update actor.json

Goal: Wire the schema files into the Actor configuration

Actions:

  1. Read the current actor.json
  2. Add or update the storages.dataset reference:
    "storages": {
        "dataset": "./dataset_schema.json"
    }
  3. If key_value_store_schema.json was generated, add the reference:
    "storages": {
        "dataset": "./dataset_schema.json",
        "keyValueStore": "./key_value_store_schema.json"
    }
  4. Add or update the output reference:
    "output": "./output_schema.json"
  5. If actor.json had inline storages.dataset or storages.keyValueStore objects (not string paths), migrate their content into the respective schema files and replace the inline objects with file path strings

Phase 6: Review and Validate

Goal: Ensure correctness and completeness

Checklist:

  • Every output field from the source code is in dataset_schema.json fields.properties — not just the overview view fields but ALL fields the Actor can produce
  • Every field has "nullable": true
  • The top-level fields object has both "additionalProperties": true and "required": []
  • Every nested object within properties also has "additionalProperties": true and "required": []
  • Every field has a "description" and an "example"
  • All example values are anonymized
  • "type" is present on every field that has "nullable"
  • Views list 8–12 most useful fields with correct display formats
  • output_schema.json has "type": "string" on every property
  • If key-value store is used: key_value_store_schema.json has collections matching all setValue/set_value calls
  • If key-value store is used: each collection uses either key or keyPrefix (not both)
  • actor.json references all generated schema files
  • Schema field names match the actual keys in the code (camelCase/snake_case consistency)
  • If existing schemas were found in the repo, the new schema follows their conventions (description style, example format, view structure)
  • Schema fields are derived from existing type definitions (interfaces, TypedDicts, dataclasses) where available — no duplicated or divergent field definitions

Present the generated schemas to the user for review before writing them.


Phase 7: Summary

Goal: Document what was created

Report:

  • Files created or updated
  • Number of fields in the dataset schema
  • Number of collections in the key-value store schema (if generated)
  • Fields selected for the overview view
  • Any fields that need user clarification (ambiguous types, unclear nullability)
  • Suggested next steps (test locally with apify run, verify output tab in Console)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.