apideck-mcp
Skill4 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Front-door skill for the Apideck MCP server — 330 unified-API tools across 10 domains plus 4 intent-grouped workflow tools, exposed via dynamic discovery. Use when the user is building an MCP-based agent (Claude Code, OpenAI Agents SDK, Pydantic AI, LangChain) and wants to integrate with any of the 200+ SaaS connectors Apideck covers. Hosted at mcp.apideck.dev/mcp; stdio transport via `npx -y @apideck/mcp` for local development.
- Reads credentials
In this repository182 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- access-financialsSkill
- acertaSkill
- activecampaignSkill
- actSkill
- acumaticaSkill
- adp-ihcmSkill
- adp-runSkill
- adp-workforce-nowSkill
- afasSkill
- alexishrSkill
- amazon-seller-centralSkill
- apideck-best-practicesSkill
- apideck-codegenSkill
- apideck-connector-coverageSkill
- apideck-dotnetSkill
- apideck-goSkill
- apideck-javaSkill
- apideck-mcp-month-end-closeSkill
- apideck-mcp-onboard-employeeSkill
- apideck-mcp-pay-billSkill
- apideck-mcp-receive-paymentSkill
- apideck-migrationSkill
- apideck-nodeSkill
- apideck-phpSkill
- apideck-portmanSkill
- apideck-pythonSkill
- apideck-restSkill
- apideck-unified-apiSkill
- asanaSkill
- attioSkill
- azure-active-directorySkill
- azure-devopsSkill
- bamboohrSkill
- banqupSkill
- basecampSkill
- bigcommerceSkill
- blackbaudSkill
- bol-comSkill
- boxSkill
- breathehrSkill
- bullhorn-atsSkill
- campfireSkill
- cascade-hrSkill
- catalystoneSkill
- cegid-talentsoftSkill
- ceridian-dayforceSkill
- cezannehrSkill
- charliehrSkill
- ciphrSkill
- clearbooks-ukSkill
- clickupSkill
- closeSkill
- copperSkill
- deelSkill
- digitsSkill
- dropboxSkill
- dualentrySkill
- ebaySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 54
HANDLE URL elicitations: when an upstream call hits a missing/expired Vault connection, the server throws UrlElicitationRequiredError (MCP …
- Very specific: line 55
USE
x-apideck-service-id: when a consumer has multiple connections of the same unified API — e.g. - Very specific: line 76
Static mode: All 330+ tools listed up front, ~25-40K tokens.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Apideck MCP
The Apideck MCP server exposes the Unified API as Model Context Protocol tools. One MCP server, 330+ tools, 200+ SaaS connectors.
If you're building an agent that needs to read/write SaaS data — invoices, candidates, employees, files, tickets, customers — and your agent runtime supports MCP (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, OpenAI Agents SDK, Pydantic AI, LangChain), this is usually the right choice over a language SDK.
When to prefer MCP over the language SDK
| Use the MCP server when… | Use a language SDK (apideck-node, apideck-python, …) when… |
| You're building an agent (LLM-driven control flow) | You're building a deterministic backend integration |
| You want dynamic tool discovery — agent picks tools at runtime | You know at compile time which methods you'll call |
| Your runtime already speaks MCP (Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Agents SDK, …) | You're embedding Apideck inside a non-agent service |
| You want Vault OAuth elicitation handled for free (consent URLs surface as MCP elicitations) | You'll wire OAuth flows yourself |
| Tool descriptions matter for agent decision-making | Your code knows which method to call regardless of description quality |
Endpoints
Hosted: https://mcp.apideck.dev/mcp
Stdio: npx -y @apideck/mcp
Source: https://github.com/apideck-libraries/mcpPass credentials via headers (HTTP)
x-apideck-api-key: <your Apideck API key>
x-apideck-app-id: <your application ID>
x-apideck-consumer-id: <end-user / customer ID>Pass credentials via env vars (stdio)
APIDECK_API_KEY=... APIDECK_APP_ID=... APIDECK_CONSUMER_ID=... npx -y @apideck/mcpIMPORTANT RULES
- PREFER dynamic mode (
?mode=dynamicor--dynamic, the default). It exposes 4 meta-tools —list_tools,describe_tool_input,execute_tool,list_scopes— instead of 330 individual tools, dropping initial token cost from ~25-40K to ~1,300. Switch to static mode only for small fixed tool sets. - CALL
list_toolsfirst with relevantsearch_terms(["accounting", "invoices"],["hris", "employees"]). Don't enumerate 330 tools. - PREFER workflow tools over manual chains — see "Intent-grouped workflows" below. The agent that picks
apideck-pay-billinstead of stitchingaccounting-bills-get+accounting-bill-payments-createwill succeed more often and leak less context. - HANDLE URL elicitations: when an upstream call hits a missing/expired Vault connection, the server throws
UrlElicitationRequiredError(MCP error code-32042) carrying a one-time consent URL. Surface this URL to the user, wait for them to complete OAuth, then retry the original tool call. - USE
x-apideck-service-idwhen a consumer has multiple connections of the same unified API — e.g. the consumer connected both Xero and QuickBooks, and the user wants the call to target Xero. Without this, Apideck routes to whichever connection is first. - USE scopes to restrict an agent to a subset of capabilities —
?scopes=readfor analysis agents,?scopes=read,writeto allow non-destructive changes, omit for full access. Scopes are enforced server-side, so a "read-only" agent literally cannot call destructive tools no matter what the prompt says.
Intent-grouped workflows
The MCP server ships 4 high-level workflow tools alongside the 330 endpoint tools. Each workflow orchestrates 2-4 underlying calls behind a single intent. Prefer these when they match the user's task — agents picking the right workflow succeed more often than agents stitching the chain manually.
| Workflow | Use when… | See |
apideck-month-end-close-check | "Give me a P&L / balance sheet / aged receivables snapshot" | apideck-mcp-month-end-close |
apideck-pay-bill | "Pay bill X" / "Settle invoice X from supplier" | apideck-mcp-pay-bill |
apideck-receive-customer-payment | "Record that customer paid invoice X" | apideck-mcp-receive-payment |
apideck-onboard-employee | "Convert hired applicant X into an employee" | apideck-mcp-onboard-employee |
Workflows return a structured result with failingStep so you know which leg of the chain broke when something fails. Partial successes (e.g. one report unsupported by the connector) come back as useful data, not opaque errors.
Mode selection
The server supports three operational modes:
- Dynamic mode (default): 4 meta-tools, ~1,300 initial tokens, agent discovers via
list_tools. Use this. - Static mode: All 330+ tools listed up front, ~25-40K tokens. Use only when you're filtering to a tiny subset (e.g.
?include=accounting-invoices-list,accounting-invoices-get) and want the schemas resolved at handshake. - Code mode (
?mode=code, experimental): Agent writes JavaScript against anapideck.*SDK in a sandbox. Beta — currently usesvm.createContextwhich isn't production-hardened. Skip for production agents.
Coverage
330 tools across these unified APIs:
| API | Tools | Examples |
| Accounting | 143 | invoices, bills, payments, suppliers, customers, P&L, balance sheet, journal entries |
| CRM | 50 | companies, contacts, leads, opportunities, pipelines, activities |
| File Storage | 32 | files, folders, drives, shared links, upload sessions |
| HRIS | 25 | employees, departments, payrolls, time-off requests |
| Vault | 23 | connections, consumers, sessions, custom mappings, logs |
| ATS | 15 | applicants, applications, jobs |
| Issue Tracking | 15 | tickets, comments, users, tags |
| Connector | 8 | API discovery, coverage metadata |
| Ecommerce | 7 | customers, orders, products, stores |
| Webhook | 6 | webhook subscriptions, logs |
| Proxy | 6 | direct GET/POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE for connector-native endpoints not yet in the unified spec |
Worked example: list invoices in dynamic mode
Agent: list_tools(search_terms: ["accounting", "invoices"])
→ Returns: [
"accounting-invoices-list",
"accounting-invoices-get",
"accounting-invoices-create",
"accounting-invoices-update",
"accounting-invoices-delete"
]
Agent: describe_tool_input(tool_name: "accounting-invoices-list")
→ Returns: {
filter: { updated_since, status, ... },
cursor: string,
limit: number,
"x-apideck-service-id": string,
...
}
Agent: execute_tool(
tool_name: "accounting-invoices-list",
input: { limit: 10, "x-apideck-service-id": "quickbooks" }
)
→ Returns: { data: [...], meta: { cursors: { next: "..." } } }Initial cost: ~1,300 tokens for the meta-tools. The agent fetches schemas only for tools it intends to call.
Related skills
apideck-unified-api— the unified-API model itself; install this alongsideapideck-mcpif your agent isn't already grounded on Apideck's routing model.apideck-best-practices— auth patterns, pagination, error handling, Vault — applies to MCP usage too.apideck-connector-coverage— how to verify a method is supported by a specific connector before calling it.- Per-workflow playbooks:
apideck-mcp-pay-bill,apideck-mcp-receive-payment,apideck-mcp-onboard-employee,apideck-mcp-month-end-close.
Reference
- Server source + docs: github.com/apideck-libraries/mcp
- Workflow tool authoring guide: docs/authoring-workflow-tools.md
- MCP protocol spec: modelcontextprotocol.io
- Glama TDQS rubric (server scores AAA): glama.ai/blog/2026-04-03-tool-definition-quality-score-tdqs
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

