security-triage
Skill756 starsChanged 52 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Assess, route and report a suspected security vulnerability in Apache StreamPipes against the project's threat model. Use when a task involves a potential vulnerability, an exploit claim, a security finding from a scanner, or a decision about whether something is in or out of the security model.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Read THREAT_MODEL.md at the repository root: the trust boundaries (the REST front door, the external-data ingestion boundary at the …
- Very specific: line 21
Read SECURITY.md for how findings are reported (security@apache.org).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Security triage for Apache StreamPipes
You are helping assess whether a reported or suspected issue is a security vulnerability in Apache StreamPipes and how it should be routed. Complete these steps before drafting any report or reaching any conclusion.
Step 1 — Read the threat model
Read THREAT_MODEL.md at the repository root: the trust boundaries (the REST front door,
the external-data ingestion boundary at the adapters, the extension runtime), the
adversaries in and out of scope, and what StreamPipes upholds versus what it leaves to the
operator. The model is v0; cite sections by number.
Step 2 — Read the security policy
Read SECURITY.md for how findings are reported (security@apache.org). Do not open a
public issue or pull request for a suspected vulnerability.
Key scoping facts (details in THREAT_MODEL.md)
- The
streampipes-restHTTP layer is the primary control boundary; the external-data ingestion boundary is at the adapters. The broker, datastore and extension-runtime services are assumed to run inside an operator-controlled perimeter. - Installed extensions (custom adapters, processors, sinks) are code execution by design, not a sandbox.
- An adapter ingesting data from an external source is the intended function; source trust and the handling guarantee for hostile ingested data are spelled out in the threat model.
- Transport security (TLS), network isolation and extension vetting are operator responsibilities, not engine invariants.
Step 3 — Route the finding
Route the finding to exactly one disposition in THREAT_MODEL.md §10 — VALID, or one of
the OUT-OF-MODEL / BY-DESIGN dispositions — and cite the section that justifies the
call. State the affected component from the §2 table and the boundary it crosses.
Output
A short triage note: disposition, justification with section citations, affected
component and boundary, and — only for VALID — the reporting route from SECURITY.md.
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- symfony/symfony★ 31ksame name
- rack/rack★ 5.1ksame name
- OpenBMB/EdgeClaw★ 1.2ksame name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openclaw-qa-testing and openclaw-secret-scanning-maintainer.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AtomicBot-aiSkillopenclaw-qa-testing
Run, watch, debug, and extend OpenClaw QA testing with qa-lab and qa-channel. Use when Codex needs to execute the repo-backed QA suite, inspect live QA artifacts, debug failing scenarios, add new QA scenarios, or explain the OpenClaw QA workflow. Prefer the live OpenAI lane with regular openai/gpt-5.4 in fast mode; do not use gpt-5.4-pro or gpt-5.4-mini unless the user explicitly overrides that policy.
Also in 4 projects that use this
QVerisAISkillopenclaw-secret-scanning-maintainer
Maintainer-only workflow for handling GitHub Secret Scanning alerts on OpenClaw. Use when Codex needs to triage, redact, clean up, and resolve secret leakage found in issue comments, issue bodies, PR comments, or other GitHub content.
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-client-go/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-client-python/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-extensions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-pipeline-management/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-resource-management/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-rest/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-service-core/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-storage-couchdb/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- streampipes-user-management/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ui/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-client-go/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-client-python/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-extensions/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-pipeline-management/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-resource-management/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-rest/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-service-core/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-storage-couchdb/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- streampipes-user-management/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ui/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

