agentleFS
apacheapache/skywalking-banyandb/skills/gh-pull-request/SKILL.md

gh-pull-request

Skill355 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Create a GitHub pull request for SkyWalking BanyanDB. Use when the user asks to create a PR, submit changes, or open a pull request.

  • Commits and pushes

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. apache/skywalking★ 25ksame name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Always create a PR from a new branch: Never push directly to main.

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    Run these checks locally before pushing.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    All source files must have Apache 2.0 license headers.

    line 47
  4. Very specific:

    Add a one-line entry under the current development version section in CHANGES.md (at the repo root).

    line 51
  5. Distinctive:

    Run these test packages. Each can run in parallel if the user's machine has enough cores, but it's fine to run them sequentially:

    line 55
  6. Distinctive:

    Run these after unit tests pass:

    line 72
  7. Very specific:

    make lint fails with formatting errors: Run make format to auto-fix, then re-run make lint to confirm.

    line 95
  8. Very specific:

    make build fails: Check if generated files are up to date with make generate

    line 99
  9. Distinctive:

    Follow the standard PR format with a summary and test plan.

    line 108
  10. Very specific:

    Only proceed when the state is MERGED.

    line 120
  11. Very specific:

    If git push origin --delete reports remote ref does not exist, GitHub already removed the remote branch.

    line 133

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Creating a Pull Request for SkyWalking BanyanDB

Branch Rules

Always create a PR from a new branch. Never push directly to main. This is the same convention as the main Apache SkyWalking repo (https://github.com/apache/skywalking).

git checkout -b <descriptive-branch-name>

Local Checks Before Creating PR

Run these checks locally before pushing. They mirror the CI check job and PR-blocking tests in .github/workflows/ci.yml.

Required: Code Generation and Build

make generate
make build

Required: Linting and Formatting

make lint
make check

make check verifies formatting (gofumpt), go mod tidy, and ensures no uncommitted generated file diffs.

Why this order: build must succeed before lint so generated code exists. check validates consistency after linting.

After make lint passes: If lint introduced any fixes (e.g. auto-formatting, field alignment corrections), commit those changes before running make check. Do NOT update CHANGES.md for these fixup commits — just stage all modified tracked files and commit with a message like chore: fix lint issues. Then run make check on the clean tree.

Required: License Headers

make license-check

All source files must have Apache 2.0 license headers.

Required: Update CHANGES.md

Add a one-line entry under the current development version section in CHANGES.md (at the repo root). Place it under the appropriate subsection (### Features, ### Bug Fixes, etc.).

Unit Tests

Run these test packages. Each can run in parallel if the user's machine has enough cores, but it's fine to run them sequentially:

make test-ci PKG=./banyand/...
make test-ci PKG=./bydbctl/...
make test-ci PKG=./pkg/...
make test-ci PKG=./fodc/...

The CI uses these options: --vv --fail-fast --label-filter \!slow with coverage flags. For local runs, use a simplified form unless the user asks for full CI parity:

TEST_CI_OPTS="--vv --fail-fast --label-filter \!slow" make test-ci PKG=./banyand/...

Integration Tests

Run these after unit tests pass:

make test-ci PKG=./test/integration/standalone/...
make test-ci PKG=./test/integration/distributed/...

Checks NOT Practical Locally

These run in CI only — no need to run locally:

  • e2e tests — require Docker + OAP stack (90 min timeout)
  • fodc-e2e tests — require Kind Kubernetes cluster
  • dependency-review — GitHub-specific action
  • slow/flaky/property-repair tests — scheduled, not PR-blocking

Common issues

  • make lint fails with field alignment errors: The linter reports structs with suboptimal field ordering (e.g. fieldalignment: struct with X pointer bytes could be Y). Fix them automatically with:
    ~/go/bin/fieldalignment -fix ./path/to/package/...
    Parse the lint output to find which packages have alignment issues, run fieldalignment -fix on those packages, then re-run make lint to confirm they're resolved.
  • make lint fails with formatting errors: Run make format to auto-fix, then re-run make lint to confirm.
  • Test timeout: Integration tests can be slow; add TEST_CI_OPTS="--timeout 60m" if they time out
  • Missing tools: make check-req will tell you what's missing
  • make lint or make check fails with buf: not found: Install buf automatically by running make -C api generate, then retry.
  • make build fails: Check if generated files are up to date with make generate

Creating the PR

git push -u origin <branch-name>
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "<body>"

Follow the standard PR format with a summary and test plan.

After the PR Is Merged

Merged branches must be removed, both locally and on origin, so they do not pile up. Do this once the PR has actually been merged — never for an open PR, and never for a PR that was closed without merging unless the user asks.

Confirm the merge state first:

gh pr view <number> --json state,mergedAt --jq '"\(.state) \(.mergedAt)"'

Only proceed when the state is MERGED. Then clean up:

git checkout main
git pull --ff-only origin main
git branch -D <branch-name>
git push origin --delete <branch-name>
git fetch --prune origin

Notes:

  • This repo only allows squash merges, so the squash commit on main never matches the branch's own commits. git branch -d therefore refuses to delete even a merged branch; -D is required, which is why the MERGED check above comes first.
  • If git push origin --delete reports remote ref does not exist, GitHub already removed the remote branch. That is fine; continue with git fetch --prune.
  • Also prune any other local branches whose upstream is already gone (earlier merged PRs). List them, confirm with the user that each was merged, then delete:

    git fetch --prune origin
    git branch -vv | grep ': gone\]' | awk '{print $1}'

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.