agentleFS
apacheapache/iceberg/AGENTS.md

iceberg

AGENTS.md9.4k starsChanged 46 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. --> Project conventions, architecture, and coding patterns synthesized from 58,000+ review comments across 4,300+ merged PRs. Reviewer attention is the project's scarcest resource. When a rule below is ambiguous, pick the option…

Trending

Steady talk.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 1 mentionFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 1 mention
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the apache/iceberg repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about apache/iceberg

The biggest 5 of 42 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 42

Talked about on GitHub, Stack Overflow, Hacker News, Bluesky and the web (42 times).

On GitHub · 29

24 more on GitHub

On Stack Overflow · 10

5 more on Stack Overflow
  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,439 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

51 rules. About 1 is common, 28 are distinctive, and 22 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈1

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈28

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 22

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Very specific:

    When assessing potential vulnerabilities or calibrating automated security findings, use SECURITY-THREAT-MODEL.md as the authoritative …

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    REST spec: Check for ambiguity, over-constraining, missing client-side guidance.

    line 50
  3. Very specific:

    Null over Optional: Use null for missing values.

    line 57
  4. Distinctive:

    Package-private by default: Only make things public with demonstrated need.

    line 59
  5. Very specific:

    Metadata updates for REST: All mutations must produce serializable MetadataUpdate objects.

    line 63
  6. Distinctive:

    Never break APIs. Add default implementations to new interface methods.

    line 73
  7. Distinctive:

    Don't introduce deprecated methods in brand-new interfaces.

    line 74
  8. Very specific:

    Use @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"}) internally rather than widening public signatures.

    line 75
  9. Distinctive:

    Prefer builders over multi-argument create methods.

    line 76
  10. Very specific:

    Keep the Table API small. Utility methods go in helper classes.

    line 77
  11. Very specific:

    Avoid get prefix — use find, fetch, load, parse, create, or drop it.

    line 84
  12. Very specific:

    Avoid Factory suffix unless the class is a true factory.

    line 87
  13. Very specific:

    Use this. for instance field assignment.

    line 92
  14. Distinctive:

    Prefer method references over lambdas.

    line 96
  15. Very specific:

    Prefer switch expressions (case X -> ...) over statement switches.

    line 97
  16. Distinctive:

    Always use imports — never use fully-qualified class names inline.

    line 98
  17. Distinctive:

    When writing new code, default to no comment and no Javadoc.

    line 102
  18. Distinctive:

    Check before adding: if the comment or Javadoc you are about to write would need editing during a refactor that keeps behavior identical, …

    line 104
  19. Distinctive:

    Don't write a comment that restates the method name, the condition, or the next line.

    line 108
  20. Very specific:

    Don't add commented-out code, section banners, or // getter / // loop over files narration.

    line 109
  21. Distinctive:

    No personal pronouns. Never describe how the code changed, what a PR did, or what the behavior used to be.

    line 110
  22. Distinctive:

    Don't name internal fields, helper classes, data structures, caching, or algorithms.

    line 115
  23. Distinctive:

    Document thrown exceptions, null behavior, and resource ownership (for example that a returned iterable must be closed).

    line 117
  24. Very specific:

    Keep @param and @return tags in api/ even when brief — @return this for method chaining is the established phrasing.

    line 118
  25. Distinctive:

    Don't re-document an inherited contract.

    line 119
  26. Very specific:

    Document public and protected members, interface methods, and anything designed to be overridden.

    line 120
  27. Very specific:

    Avoid expanding Guava — use JDK equivalents.

    line 149
  28. Distinctive:

    Keep things internal until proven needed.

    line 150
  29. Very specific:

    Never use Jackson annotations.

    line 154
  30. Very specific:

    Use Iterable/CloseableIterable over Stream.

    line 158
  31. Very specific:

    Use Iceberg's Pair instead of Map.Entry.

    line 159
  32. Very specific:

    Don't swallow exceptions. Use closeQuietly for cleanup that shouldn't mask real failures.

    line 164
  33. Very specific:

    Use ConcurrentMap for shared mutable state.

    line 165
  34. Distinctive:

    Avoid streams/closures in tight loops.

    line 174
  35. Distinctive:

    Test the behavior in the plan.

    line 186
  36. Distinctive:

    Test the behavior this change adds or modifies.

    line 187
  37. Distinctive:

    Don't add tests for unreachable states, or tests that only restate the implementation.

    line 190
  38. Distinctive:

    Test classes and methods should be package private unless required by inheritance.

    line 192
  39. Distinctive:

    Write the most direct test for the bug.

    line 194
  40. Very specific:

    Avoid using test prefixes for newly added tests.

    line 196
  41. Distinctive:

    Search open PRs and issues for the same problem before starting.

    line 219
  42. Distinctive:

    Keep first version of a PR minimal — defer recovery, optimization, and edge cases to follow-ups.

    line 222
  43. Very specific:

    Before opening a PR, run ./gradlew spotlessApply, run checkstyleMain and checkstyleTest for the modules you changed, and build and test …

    line 223
  44. Distinctive:

    Never restate the diff: no file-by-file walkthrough, no per-method summaries, no "Changes made" checklist, no "Summary", "Background", …

    line 225
  45. Distinctive:

    Commit messages describe the *what* and *why*, not implementation details.

    line 226
  46. Distinctive:

    Add the following block at the bottom of PR descriptions:

    line 250
  47. Very specific:

    Never: add Jackson annotations to serialization classes — always use custom XxxParser classes.

    line 264
  48. Very specific:

    Never: add Hadoop dependencies where FileIO abstractions exist.

    line 266
  49. Common:

    Never: commit secrets, credentials, or cloud-specific tokens.

    line 267
  50. Distinctive:

    Ask first: before adding new third-party dependencies (license compatibility matters).

    line 268
  51. Distinctive:

    Ask first: before promoting package-private classes/methods to public.

    line 269

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md
<!-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. -->

Apache Iceberg — Agent Instructions

Project conventions, architecture, and coding patterns synthesized from 58,000+ review comments across 4,300+ merged PRs.

Reviewer attention is the project's scarcest resource. When a rule below is ambiguous, pick the option that produces less for a reviewer to read.

Security Model

When assessing potential vulnerabilities or calibrating automated security findings, use SECURITY-THREAT-MODEL.md as the authoritative detailed description of Iceberg's security boundaries, trust assumptions, and non-boundaries.

Architecture

Module Boundaries

  • API (api/): Public interfaces and types. Changes affect every engine and catalog. API breaks are almost never acceptable.
  • Core (core/): Table spec implementation. Must be engine-agnostic. No Spark/Flink references. Properties should apply to all catalogs.
  • Data (data/): Generic data layer (DeleteFilter, BaseDeleteLoader, readers/writers). Behavior should be general, not engine-specific.
  • Spark (spark/): Spark integration only. Tests here validate integration, not core behavior.
  • Flink (flink/): Same principle as Spark — integration tests only.
  • REST Catalog (open-api/): OpenAPI spec for catalog interop. Precision in spec text is critical.
  • AWS/GCP/Azure: Cloud-specific catalog implementations. Don't leak cloud-specific assumptions into core.

The api/ module has the strongest stability guarantees — breaking changes are almost never allowed. Other modules with public APIs (iceberg-data, iceberg-parquet, and others marked in build.gradle) may have breaking changes in minor releases, but they must be justified and all changes are tracked via revapi. New interface methods in any of these modules must include default implementations.

High-Sensitivity Areas

  • TableMetadata: Changes ripple through all engines and catalogs. Use TableMetadata.Builder; produce proper metadata updates for REST.
  • SnapshotProducer / MergingSnapshotProducer: The commit path. Validations must use established patterns.
  • ManifestGroup / ManifestReader: Container reuse causes bugs in parallel code. Callers must copyWithoutStats if holding references.
  • Serialization (parsers): Never use Jackson annotations. Custom XxxParser.toJson/fromJson only. JSON keys use kebab-case. Optional fields only written when present.
  • REST spec: Check for ambiguity, over-constraining, missing client-side guidance. POST for deltas, PUT for full-state replacement.
  • Scan planning: Metrics must not leak across TableScan refinements. Timers must be thread-safe (parallel manifest scanning).

Design Patterns

  • Refinement: TableScan methods return new independent scans. State must not leak between refinements.
  • CloseableIterable over Stream: Iceberg's standard lazy collection. Always close iterables.
  • Null over Optional: Use null for missing values. Optional is not used.
  • Builder pattern: For complex creation. Never require passing null for optional parameters.
  • Package-private by default: Only make things public with demonstrated need.
  • Postel's Law: Accept case-insensitive input, produce canonical output.
  • Tasks.foreach: For bulk operations with parallelism, retry, and error handling.
  • Immutable metadata: TableMetadata, Schema, PartitionSpec, SortOrder produce new instances via builders.
  • Metadata updates for REST: All mutations must produce serializable MetadataUpdate objects.
  • SerializableTable: Wrap table references for Spark/Flink serialization. Don't serialize the catalog.
  • Validate at boundaries: Preconditions at public entry points; internal methods assume invariants hold.
  • Spec version gating: Version 2+ features must check formatVersion >= 2 with clear errors for v1 tables.

Coding Conventions

API Design

  • New public methods require strong justification. Prefer package-private.
  • Never break APIs. Add default implementations to new interface methods.
  • Don't introduce deprecated methods in brand-new interfaces.
  • Use @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"}) internally rather than widening public signatures.
  • Prefer builders over multi-argument create methods.
  • Keep the Table API small. Utility methods go in helper classes.
  • Operations should be idempotent. Return final state from apply(), not intermediate changes.
  • Minimize third-party types (JTS, Guava) in public APIs. StructLike equality requires StructLikeWrapper.

Naming

  • Method names describe specific behavior: selectInIdOrder not selectOrdered.
  • Avoid get prefix — use find, fetch, load, parse, create, or drop it.
  • Variable names indicate meaning, not type. Property names use kebab-case.
  • Capitalize ID consistently. toString() must produce parseable output.
  • Avoid Factory suffix unless the class is a true factory.

Code Style

  • 2 spaces indent, 4 spaces continuation. Empty newline after control flow blocks.
  • Use this. for instance field assignment. Preconditions calls first in methods.
  • No final on locals. No one-argument-per-line unless necessary.
  • Magic numbers should be named constants.
  • } else { on same line. Minimize variable scope. try-with-resources for all AutoCloseable.
  • Prefer method references over lambdas. Wrap lines at the highest semantic level.
  • Prefer switch expressions (case X -> ...) over statement switches. Exhaustive enum switches need no default; others must have one.
  • Always use imports — never use fully-qualified class names inline.

Comments & Javadoc

When writing new code, default to no comment and no Javadoc. Add one only when it states something the code does not. Leave existing comments and Javadoc as they are unless you are changing the code they describe or they have become wrong.

Check before adding: if the comment or Javadoc you are about to write would need editing during a refactor that keeps behavior identical, it is describing internals — rewrite it or leave it out.

Comments

  • Don't write a comment that restates the method name, the condition, or the next line.
  • Don't add commented-out code, section banners, or // getter / // loop over files narration.
  • No personal pronouns. Never describe how the code changed, what a PR did, or what the behavior used to be.

Javadoc

  • Javadoc states the goal — what the method does for the caller — never how it does it. Strictest in api/.
  • Don't name internal fields, helper classes, data structures, caching, or algorithms. If you find yourself naming a type that isn't in the signature, you are documenting internals.
  • One sentence is usually enough. Longer is justified only by contract the caller must know: see AppendFiles.appendManifest, whose length is entirely about manifest lifecycle ownership on success and failure.
  • Document thrown exceptions, null behavior, and resource ownership (for example that a returned iterable must be closed).
  • Keep @param and @return tags in api/ even when brief — @return this for method chaining is the established phrasing. Don't strip them.
  • Don't re-document an inherited contract; let overrides inherit unless they narrow or extend it.
  • Document public and protected members, interface methods, and anything designed to be overridden. private and package-private methods get none unless there is a caller obligation the signature can't express, such as a required lock or pre-sorted input.
// Bad: documents the algorithm. The caller cannot rely on any of it.
/**
 * Plans files by opening each manifest in the current snapshot's manifest list, evaluating the
 * filter expression against partition summaries to skip manifests, then reading the surviving
 * manifests in parallel using the worker pool and wrapping each entry in a BaseFileScanTask.
 *
 * @return an iterable of scan tasks
 */
CloseableIterable<FileScanTask> planFiles();

// Good: the goal, plus the one thing the caller must do.
/**
 * Plans the files that will be read by this scan.
 *
 * <p>The returned iterable holds open resources and must be closed by the caller.
 *
 * @return an iterable of scan tasks matching this scan's filters
 */
CloseableIterable<FileScanTask> planFiles();

Code Placement

  • Extract reusable logic to the right utility layer (TypeUtil, SchemaUtil, DateTimeUtil, etc.).
  • Engine-specific concepts must not leak into core. Follow existing patterns before introducing new ones.
  • Parsers: XxxParser.toJson/fromJson. Config: XxxProperties. Check existing utilities first.
  • Avoid expanding Guava — use JDK equivalents. Use CloseableGroup for multi-resource lifecycle.
  • Keep things internal until proven needed.

Serialization

  • Never use Jackson annotations. Custom XxxParser.toJson/fromJson only.
  • JSON keys: kebab-case. Optional fields: only write when non-null. Required fields: validate in constructors.
  • Preconditions.checkArgument for validation. MoreObjects.toStringHelper for toString().
  • Wrap IOException in UncheckedIOException. Use Locale.ROOT for case conversions.
  • Use Iterable/CloseableIterable over Stream. Use null not Optional. Chain exception causes.
  • Use Iceberg's Pair instead of Map.Entry.

Error Handling

  • Messages: direct, actionable, with specific values. Capitalize first word.
  • Don't swallow exceptions. Use closeQuietly for cleanup that shouldn't mask real failures.
  • Use ConcurrentMap for shared mutable state. Preconditions.checkArgument over NPE.
  • Close iterables in finally. Separate Preconditions calls for each condition.
  • Forward compatibility: don't fail on unknown reserved bytes.

Performance

  • Watch for hidden materialization in streaming pipelines (copy/collect steps).
  • Builders over rebuild patterns in hot paths. Lazy over eager evaluation.
  • ByteBuffer over byte[]. Direct-access arrays for dense integer keys.
  • Avoid streams/closures in tight loops. Cache per-class, not per-call.

Configuration

  • New features default to off. Question whether a property is even needed.
  • Properties must work across all catalogs. Zero/negative disables caches/features.
  • Versions go to version catalog. Engine-specific properties don't belong in TableProperties.

Testing

Write the test plan before the tests. State in the PR description what behavior needs verifying and why each case matters — a few lines, not a document.

  • Test the behavior in the plan. Coverage is not a target.
  • Test the behavior this change adds or modifies. Don't assert the correctness of components this code merely calls.
  • One behavior per test method. No omnibus tests asserting several unrelated things.
  • A failing test must point to broken behavior. Don't add one that would fail only because an internal detail changed while the observable behavior is still correct.
  • Don't add tests for unreachable states, or tests that only restate the implementation.
  • Minimal test setup: PartitionSpec.unpartitioned() when partitioning isn't needed.
  • Test classes and methods should be package private unless required by inheritance.
  • Compute expected values, don't hardcode. Tests belong in the module that owns the code.
  • Write the most direct test for the bug. Parameterized tests for type variations.
  • JUnit 5 + AssertJ: @Test, assertThat, assertThatThrownBy.
  • Avoid using test prefixes for newly added tests.
  • waitUntilAfter for time-dependent tests. Separate tests over combined.

REST / OpenAPI Spec

  • Spec describes behavior, not implementation. RFC 2119: "MUST" = absolute, "SHOULD" = may reject.
  • Include client-side guidance. Consistent encoding terminology. 409 for "already exists", not 400.
  • Favor the client: required response fields reduce client complexity.

Commands

  • Build (no tests): ./gradlew build -x test -x integrationTest
  • Single test class: ./gradlew :iceberg-core:test --tests org.apache.iceberg.TestTableMetadata
  • Single test method: ./gradlew :iceberg-core:test --tests "org.apache.iceberg.TestTableMetadata.testJsonSerialization"
  • Spark-versioned module: ./gradlew :iceberg-spark:iceberg-spark-4.1_2.13:test --tests "org.apache.iceberg.spark.source.TestSparkReaderDeletes"
  • Format code: ./gradlew spotlessApply
  • Check formatting: ./gradlew spotlessCheck
  • Checkstyle (core module): ./gradlew :iceberg-core:checkstyleMain :iceberg-core:checkstyleTest (replace the module path for other modules).
  • API compatibility: ./gradlew revApi

PR & Commit Conventions

  • Never open a PR generated from an issue without a human in the loop.
  • Search open PRs and issues for the same problem before starting. Don't add a duplicate.
  • PR titles follow Module: Description format (e.g., Core: Fix ..., Spark: Add ..., Docs: Update ...).
  • One concern per PR. Unrelated whitespace, import, or formatting changes go in separate PRs.
  • Keep first version of a PR minimal — defer recovery, optimization, and edge cases to follow-ups.
  • Before opening a PR, run ./gradlew spotlessApply, run checkstyleMain and checkstyleTest for the modules you changed, and build and test those modules (see Commands). Never submit code you have not compiled and run.
  • PR description is one paragraph, under 120 words: the problem, the approach, and anything a reviewer would not guess from the diff. Plus the issue link, the test plan, and the AI Disclosure block. Nothing else.
  • Never restate the diff: no file-by-file walkthrough, no per-method summaries, no "Changes made" checklist, no "Summary", "Background", "Motivation", or "Testing" headings, no emoji.
  • Commit messages describe the what and why, not implementation details.
  • Apache License header required on all new files (enforced by spotless pre-commit hook).

AI-Generated PR Disclosure

Pull requests that are authored or substantially generated by AI agents must disclose that in the PR description. Always include an AI Disclosure block at the bottom, using the template below.

  • Fill in the fields you know. For fields you cannot determine, use [unknown - human to fill in].
  • Never self-certify review. An agent must not set Human Oversight to fully reviewed — leave that for the human to state what they actually reviewed.
  • Name the specific parts that are generated, not merely that AI was used (e.g. "the parser changes and their tests are generated; the spec interpretation is the author's").
  • Never auto-generate replies to review comments.
  • AI-generated review comments must be reviewed for accuracy before posting. Auto-posting unreviewed AI comments is discouraged.

See the ASF generative tooling guidelines for additional policy on AI-generated contributions. Generated files must still follow Iceberg's Apache License header and license check requirements unless explicitly excluded by project policy. For commits authored using generative AI tooling, include a Generated-by: <tool> token in the commit message.

Required Fields

  • Model: Set this to your model identifier and version (e.g., Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro).
  • Platform/Tool: Set this to the tool or platform that orchestrated the generation (e.g., GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Aider, Claude Code, custom script).
  • Human Oversight: Set this to fully reviewed, partially reviewed, or unreviewed. If unknown, use [unknown - human to fill in].
  • Prompt Summary: A brief description of the prompt or task given to the agent.

PR Description Template

Add the following block at the bottom of PR descriptions:

---
**AI Disclosure**
- Model: [model name and version]
- Platform/Tool: [tool or platform name]
- Human Oversight: [fully reviewed | partially reviewed | unreviewed]
- Prompt Summary: [brief description of the task]

Boundaries

  • Never modify .asf.yaml, LICENSE, NOTICE, or versions.props without explicit discussion.
  • Never add Jackson annotations to serialization classes — always use custom XxxParser classes.
  • Never break public API without an approved revapi.yml exception.
  • Never add Hadoop dependencies where FileIO abstractions exist.
  • Never commit secrets, credentials, or cloud-specific tokens.
  • Ask first before adding new third-party dependencies (license compatibility matters).
  • Ask first before promoting package-private classes/methods to public.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.