conviction-take
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Build Antoine an investor-grade take on anything he sends: a company, a funding round, a product launch, a piece of legislation, a political article, a historical argument, a cultural or scientific claim. Use this whenever he drops a company name, a link, a tweet, a press release, an article excerpt, a headline, or a paste with no instruction and asks for a take, a view, a read, an angle, or a conviction: 'help me develop a take on this', 'what's your read on X', 'is this actually interesting', 'X just raised $Y, thoughts?', 'help me build conviction', 'is this groundbreaking or just marketing', 'what do you make of this'. Trigger even when he only names a subject with no question attached, even when the subject is not business-related, and even when he seems to already know the answer. NOT for writing memos or posts he will send to someone else (that is writing-style or post-drafter), and not for reviewing contracts.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- contract-deep-reviewSkill
- contract-triageSkill
- morningSkill
- post-drafterSkill
- receipt-captureSkill
- restore-macSkill
- save-liked-postSkill
- skill-name-in-kebab-caseSkill
- update-rebuild-recipeSkill
- writing-styleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.