create
Skill233 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Writes briefs, articles, FAQ blocks, comparison pages and social posts from what AI engines ask and cite.
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-toolword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- veypi/aic-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- serbanghita/plan-critique-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- CAFEERON21br18/Daily_Master_Prompttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- harshil-1411/claude_plugin_video_studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- microsoft/Employee-Self-Service-Agent-Developer-Kittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use status.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 18
- MJbae/awesome-novel-studio★ 148same name
- crisandrews/ClawCode★ 64same name
- Zane-0x5a/remotion-director★ 48same name
- microsoft/Employee-Self-Service-Agent-Developer-Kit★ 29same name
- myclaude-sh/myclaude-creator-engine★ 25same name
- Popschlock/Claude-Harness-Generator★ 14same name
- serbanghita/plan-critique-skills★ 13same name
- froster02/mini-Brain_skills★ 4same name
- VoTruongDanh/Skills-Agent★ 4same name
- DoctorMozg/claude-pipelines★ 2same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- analyzeSkill
- ansvisor-aeo-coachSkill
- ansvisor-aeo-coach-standaloneSkill
- answerfirstSkill
- audit-fixSkill
- auditSkill
- beatSkill
- compareSkill
- factsSkill
- fanoutSkill
- faqSkill
- featuresSkill
- gapsSkill
- imageSkill
- listingsSkill
- marketsSkill
- new-reportSkill
- opportunitiesSkill
- optimizeSkill
- promptsSkill
- publishSkill
- qualitySkill
- questionsSkill
- refreshSkill
- reportSkill
- rivalsSkill
- setupSkill
- shoppingSkill
- startSkill
- tasksSkill
- translateSkill
- winbackSkill
- wrongclaimSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Read only these, for the chat's brand and the topic or page the person names:
- Very specific: line 26
Use list_brands only when no brand is selected, and open_page to link the Content Library.
- Distinctive: line 32
Ask the format (brief, article, FAQ block, comparison page or social post), the target page and the length only when the request doesn't …
- Distinctive: line 38
Write the piece answer-first: a direct answer under each heading, then detail.
- Distinctive: line 52
Never publish: going live is always the person's click.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create content
The playbook of the /create shortcut ("Create content for …"): a piece of content written to be cited by AI engines, from the brand's prompts, fan-outs and the pages AI cites now.
Data plan
Read only these, for the chat's brand and the topic or page the person names:
list_prompts,get_prompt_performanceandlist_topics: the prompts the piece should win, and how the brand does on them.get_fanoutsandget_prompt_insights: what the engines search for behind those prompts, and which matter most.list_citations: the pages AI cites for them now.fetch_pagefor one or two of those cited pages, and for the brand's own page when the piece updates it.list_content_opportunities, when the person names no topic.list_draftsandget_draft: a draft already open for the same page.
Use list_brands only when no brand is selected, and open_page to link the Content Library.
Scope: the last 30 days, every platform the plan tracks.
Questions
- Ask the format (brief, article, FAQ block, comparison page or social post), the target page and the length only when the request doesn't say and the answer changes what you write. Two questions at most, together.
Steps
- Pick the questions the piece must answer: the prompts and fan-outs with the most demand.
- See what the cited pages answer, and what they leave out.
- Write the piece answer-first: a direct answer under each heading, then detail. For an FAQ or a comparison page, add the structured data as a code block.
- When the person wants it kept, save it as a draft with
create_draft; the app asks them first when it should. In an agent's run nobody is there to ask: always save it with its tool, and the app holds it for approval where the agent's mode needs it.
Output
The piece as a document, with its structured data as code when it has some.
Next moves
Two or three, such as opening it in the Content Editor, or an FAQ block for the same prompts.
Don't
- Public content: no tracking numbers unless the person asks, no weak or made-up statistics, and use [placeholders] for facts, quotes and figures the person must give.
- Never publish: going live is always the person's click.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

