project-closeout
Skill62 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Close or transition a consulting engagement through acceptance, handover, knowledge transfer, benefits ownership, financial reconciliation, and lessons learned. Use for successful completion, early termination, suspension, or transition to business-as-usual.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- t46/ra-skillstheir own version, first seen May 18, 2026
- TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 25, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- TashanGKD/tashan-cursor-skills★ 21same name
- t46/ra-skills★ 16same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- change-managementSkill
- client-deliverablesSkill
- due-diligenceSkill
- engagement-pricingSkill
- engagement-setupSkill
- financial-modelingSkill
- implementation-planningSkill
- org-designSkill
- process-excellenceSkill
- project-governanceSkill
- proposal-developmentSkill
- strategic-analysisSkill
- thought-leadershipSkill
- workshop-facilitationSkill
- writing-styleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 35
Use closeout and early termination for readiness records, lessons, handover, and a difficult ending.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Closeout
Leave the client able to operate the delivered work and maintain a clear record of what was accepted, transferred, and left open. Adapt closeout to successful completion, early termination, suspension, or transition to business-as-usual. A paused project needs restart conditions; a terminated project needs an accurate partial handover.
Use the agreement, deliverable inventory, acceptance records, finances, and operating responsibilities supplied. Extract lists and figures from those materials; do not invent them. Produce supported draft sections with explicit gaps, asking only when a missing input changes the closure decision. Preserve the agreed scope and support obligations.
Assess readiness
Separate closure conditions, tasks needed to reach them, and items the authorized owner can accept with a resolution plan. Acceptance of delivered scope may occur before longer-term benefits mature. Do not require future benefits to be fully realized or every minor issue resolved if the agreed closure criteria permit handover.
Record each deliverable's current version, location, status, acceptance evidence, receiving owner, and open items. Distinguish delivered, reviewed, accepted, and operationally supported. A draft signature block is not acceptance.
Transfer usable ownership
Prepare the user, technical, operating, or analytical documentation the work actually needs. A financial model needs assumptions and update instructions; a live process may need a runbook, monitoring, escalation, and tested exception handling. Do not require API documentation or hypercare for a memo-only engagement.
For knowledge transfer, identify the recipient, method, material, and evidence that the recipient can use it. A document link or attendance record alone may not demonstrate readiness for critical work. Define the post-project support scope, dates, owner, escalation, and any unresolved commitment from the actual agreement.
For benefits, transfer definition, baseline, target basis, current measurement, source, calculation, owner, and review or intervention trigger. Separate measured results from forecasts and annualized run rates. Do not impose a generic benefits calendar. Plan future reviews where appropriate, without scheduling them unless authorized.
Reconcile and learn
Reconcile budget, actual and committed costs, invoices, payments, expenses, and remaining obligations. Explain variances and distinguish a proposed settlement from agreed billing. Release resources and access only through the relevant authority, with continuity and retention obligations understood.
Use closeout and early termination for readiness records, lessons, handover, and a difficult ending. Capture lessons from evidence and translate them into a specific change for future work; do not invent personnel feedback or attribute quotes without support.
For regulated engagements, data disposition, or retention questions, read regulated-industry closeout. Verify applicable current rules, contracts, holds, and ownership before recommending disposition. Drafting a closeout plan does not authorize deleting data or closing contracts.
Deliver
Produce the requested checklist, handover pack, acceptance draft, retrospective, or closure report. State the closure recommendation, completed and pending evidence, accepted open items, receiving owners, and remaining decisions. Check that the summary reflects the records and the client has a usable route to support. Do not claim sign-off, payment, access revocation, or knowledge transfer has occurred without evidence.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

