prd-taskmaster
Skill608 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Zero-config goal-to-tasks engine (the Atlas engine). Takes any goal (software, pentest, business, learning), runs adaptive discovery via brainstorming, generates a validated spec, produces a content-addressed plan and materialises canonical Atlas Kanban cards by default (explicit taskmaster-file compatibility remains available). Use when user says "PRD", "product requirements", "I want to build", invokes /atlas, or wants task-driven development.
- Reads credentials
- Sends data out
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anombyte93/atlas-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 26, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- anombyte93/atlas-ai-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- atlasSkill
- customise-workflowSkill
- discoverSkill
- execute-fleetSkill
- execute-taskSkill
- expand-tasksSkill
- generateSkill
- goSkill
- handoffSkill
- setupSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
25 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 17 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
17
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 52
Do NOT silently default to script.py.
- Very specific: line 61
If a ToolSearch tool exists in your session: a.
- Very specific: line 66
If both user-scope and plugin-scope match, prefer mcp__atlas-engine__.
- Very specific: line 67
No ToolSearch, but an engine_preflight MCP tool is already directly callable →
- Distinctive: line 76
MCP-mode ON: every operation in the "Engine operations" table below MUST use its MCP tool.
- Very specific: line 81
MCP-mode OFF: use the script.py commands exactly as documented below.
- Distinctive: line 84
If an MCP call errors mid-run (server died/disconnected), say so explicitly, flip to CLI-mode, and continue.
- Very specific: line 93
No config, but any file under .taskmaster/ already exists: taskmaster-file, with a Legacy notice.
- Very specific: line 97
Never silently migrate it.
- Very specific: line 103
Use explicit absolute PROJECT_ROOT and ATLAS_SCRIPT paths, PYTHON (normally python3), a stable ATLAS_PROJECT name and an authorised …
- Distinctive: line 105
Do not invent a board or fall back to file mode if the owner is unavailable.
- Very specific: line 116
Read the returned config. For atlas-kanban, run doctor --project-root "$PROJECT_ROOT" (MCP: doctor(project_root=...)) and report the …
- Distinctive: line 118
Before the first materialisation, reachability is UNKNOWN and exit 1 is expected because there is no canonical task reference yet.
- Distinctive: line 128
Run preflight and auto-detect everything.
- Very specific: line 130
MCP-mode (from Phase 0 — ONE batched call, no script spam): call <prefix>engine_preflight once — it covers preflight + taskmaster detection …
- Very specific: line 155
Use init-taskmaster only when explicitly operating the taskmaster backend:
- Very specific: line 164
If configure-providers returns recommended_action: "init_taskmaster", run init-project first.
- Distinctive: line 180
Always prefer subscription/native providers before paid API keys:
- Very specific: line 189
Do not require ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or paid PERPLEXITY_API_KEY when native Claude/Codex and Perplexity API Free are available.
- Distinctive: line 193
Read the phase file and follow it:
- Very specific: line 231
every task has at least 2 subtasks with id, title, description, status, and dependencies
- Distinctive: line 238
Treat successful validation + enrichment + phaseConfig validation as equivalent to TaskMaster parse + expand.
- Very specific: line 366
If the perplexity-api-free MCP wrapper times out or says the proxy is unreachable, check direct proxy health:
- Very specific: line 375
If direct curl works, continue: use MCP, direct proxy calls, or agent research to produce the results.json schema, then normalize prose …
- Very specific: line 389
All commands default --tag to .taskmaster/state.json currentTag and run from the project root.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
prd-taskmaster — the Atlas engine
Zero-config goal-to-tasks engine. AI handles discovery and content; the engine backend (MCP
server preferred, script.py fallback — see Phase 0) handles mechanics.
Command: /atlas is the canonical invocation (or /prd-taskmaster, or just say "I want to
build …"). The full plugin install also exposes phase skills; this standalone skill runs the whole
pipeline inline.
Script: ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py (all commands output JSON). It is a thin
shim over the bundled prd_taskmaster/ package — the single source of truth shared with the plugin.
Manual flag: Driver-authored generation still honours the selected task provider.
For atlas-kanban, write candidates and run plan, then materialize, as described
below. Only in taskmaster-file mode perform the legacy TaskMaster mechanics yourself:
write .taskmaster/docs/prd.md and .taskmaster/tasks/tasks.json, validate and enrich.
When to Use
Activate: PRD, product requirements, taskmaster, task-driven development, "I want to build X", any goal. Skip: API docs, test specs, project timelines, PDF creation.
Phase 0: Engine Backend Resolution (MANDATORY — before any other engine operation)
The engine has two interchangeable backends: the atlas-engine MCP server (preferred) and script.py (zero-dependency fallback). Resolve which one this session uses NOW. Do NOT silently default to script.py.
Claude Code note — deferred tools: MCP tools are often deferred: their names appear
in a system-reminder list but they are NOT callable until you load their schemas with the
ToolSearch tool. "I don't see a callable engine_preflight tool" does NOT mean the server
is absent — it almost always means you have not run ToolSearch yet.
Resolution procedure, in order:
- If a
ToolSearchtool exists in your session: a.ToolSearch(query="select:mcp__atlas-engine__engine_preflight")b. If no match:ToolSearch(query="+engine preflight atlas", max_results=10)— this also catches plugin-scoped ids such asmcp__plugin_prd_go__engine_preflight. c. If a schema loads → MCP-mode = ON. Record the prefix (e.g.mcp__atlas-engine__). If both user-scope and plugin-scope match, prefermcp__atlas-engine__. - No ToolSearch, but an
engine_preflightMCP tool is already directly callable → MCP-mode = ON with that prefix. - Otherwise → MCP-mode = OFF (CLI-mode).
Announce the result before Phase 1, exactly one line:
Engine backend: MCP (<prefix>*) or Engine backend: script.py (CLI fallback).
Hard rules for the rest of the run:
- MCP-mode ON: every operation in the "Engine operations" table below MUST use its MCP
tool. Running
python3 script.py <cmd>for an op that has an MCP tool in this session's prefix is a compliance failure — the only exceptions are ops in the "Script/agent-only" table and ops whose tool is missing from the resolved prefix (some plugin installs expose fewer tools — fall back to script.py for just those ops). - MCP-mode OFF: use the script.py commands exactly as documented below. Other harnesses (codex, gemini) have no ToolSearch and may have no MCP server — CLI-mode is fully supported and not a degraded experience.
- If an MCP call errors mid-run (server died/disconnected), say so explicitly, flip to CLI-mode, and continue.
Phase 1: Task ownership, before legacy initialisation
Task storage is independent of the optional generation backend. Resolve it BEFORE
init-project, engine-preflight, or any legacy task-state command:
- Existing
.atlas-workflow.json: honourtask_providerexactly. - No config, but any file under
.taskmaster/already exists:taskmaster-file, with a Legacy notice. Empty Taskmaster folders and a baredocs/prd.mdstay new. Provider metadata (.atlas-workflow.json,.atlas-ai/plan.jsonand.atlas-ai/materializations.json) lives outside.taskmaster/and does not count. Never silently migrate it.import-preview --project-root "$PROJECT_ROOT" --project "$ATLAS_PROJECT"is read-only and marks history as not fresh verification. Changing provider is an explicit owner decision. - Otherwise:
atlas-kanban, the default in-house path, with no Taskmaster runtime, API key,.taskmasterinitialisation or second task store required.
Use explicit absolute PROJECT_ROOT and ATLAS_SCRIPT paths, PYTHON (normally
python3), a stable ATLAS_PROJECT name and an authorised ATLAS_BOARD on this host.
Do not invent a board or fall back to file mode if the owner is unavailable. A remote
owner_host is refused; run on that owner host instead.
For the new-project default (or an existing atlas-kanban config), persist the selection. The omitted --task-provider honours existing configs rather than switching them:
<!-- atlas-kanban-setup -->"$PYTHON" "$ATLAS_SCRIPT" provider-configure --project-root "$PROJECT_ROOT" --board "$ATLAS_BOARD"Read the returned config. For atlas-kanban, run doctor --project-root
"$PROJECT_ROOT" (MCP: doctor(project_root=...)) and report the diagnostics.
Before the first materialisation, reachability is UNKNOWN and exit 1 is expected
because there is no canonical task reference yet; help advertises syntax only.
Continue Discovery, then the atlas-kanban branch of phases/GENERATE.md, then the
atlas-kanban branch of phases/HANDOFF.md. Do NOT run the legacy initialisation,
parse/expand, enrichment, task-state or per-task dry-run verification paths below.
The manual flag selects driver-authored planning, not a different task provider.
Legacy taskmaster-file preflight only
The remainder of this phase and Native Mode below apply ONLY to taskmaster-file. Run preflight and auto-detect everything. Ask zero setup questions.
MCP-mode (from Phase 0 — ONE batched call, no script spam): call
<prefix>engine_preflight once — it covers preflight + taskmaster detection + provider
configuration + capabilities and returns a summary list to present verbatim.
Skip every individual script call below entirely.
CLI-mode (zero-dependency installs): one batched subcommand, same result:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py engine-preflightFrom preflight JSON, determine the state:
| Condition | Action |
prd_path exists + task_count > 0 | Ask: execute tasks / update PRD / new PRD / review |
backend.ai_ops == "agent" | Backend resolves automatically; print ONE info line: add an API key or install task-master-ai for headless AI ops; proceed |
| manual flag present | Proceed using Native Mode (TaskMaster optional), regardless of TaskMaster CLI/MCP state |
has_taskmaster == false + backend selected | Run init-project (below), then continue |
has_taskmaster but no PRD | Proceed to Discovery |
has_crash_state | Offer: resume from crash point or start fresh |
Initialise the project if needed, then auto-configure providers (silent). Use
init-project for the resolved backend. For the taskmaster backend, this preserves
an existing .mcp.json; raw task-master init overwrites it with a placeholder template.
Use init-taskmaster only when explicitly operating the taskmaster backend:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py init-project # only when .taskmaster/ absent
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py init-taskmaster # taskmaster backend only
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py configure-providers
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py detect-providersIf configure-providers returns recommended_action: "init_taskmaster", run
init-project first; if the backend is explicitly taskmaster, init-taskmaster
is also safe and preserves .mcp.json.
Report compact status:
✓ Backend: taskmaster-api|native-api|agent
✓ Detected: TaskMaster (MCP|CLI)
✓ Detected: Provider (Claude Code|Codex CLI|Anthropic API)
✓ Detected: Research (Perplexity API Free|Perplexity MCP|Perplexity API|fallback)Gate: backend resolved (always true). Report ai_ops capability. Proceed to Discovery.
Provider Defaults
Always prefer subscription/native providers before paid API keys:
- Main:
claude-code/sonnetwhenclaudeexists; otherwisecodex-cli/gpt-5.2-codexwhencodexexists. - Fallback:
codex-cli/gpt-5.2-codexwhen available; otherwiseclaude-code/sonnet. - Research: local Perplexity API Free through TaskMaster
openai-compatibleprovider:- model:
sonar - baseURL:
http://127.0.0.1:8765 .envkey:OPENAI_COMPATIBLE_API_KEY="local-perplexity-api-free"(dummy local key only)
- model:
Do not require ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or paid PERPLEXITY_API_KEY when native Claude/Codex and Perplexity API Free are available.
Phase 2: Discovery
Read the phase file and follow it:
Read ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/phases/DISCOVER.mdProgressive, adaptive, domain-agnostic discovery via superpowers:brainstorming.
Gate: Discovery complete and user approved design. Proceed to Generate.
Phase 3: Generate & Validate
Read the phase file and follow it:
Read ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/phases/GENERATE.mdGenerate and validate the spec for both providers. For atlas-kanban, hash a storage-independent plan, materialise through the owner and read canonical IDs back. For taskmaster-file only, parse tasks and enrich them with metadata.
Gate, conditional on the persisted provider:
- atlas-kanban: approved/validated spec, hashed plan, successful whole-plan materialisation and canonical IDs read back. A partial is not completion. Proceed to canonical Handoff.
- taskmaster-file: PRD validated GOOD+ and tasks created through TaskMaster parse/expand OR Native Mode. Proceed to file-mode Handoff.
Native Mode (TaskMaster optional, taskmaster-file only)
Formerly "Manual Mechanics Mode". Only for the persisted taskmaster-file provider,
the engine produces the same validated task graph without TaskMaster. In that provider,
use it when the user passes --manual, TaskMaster isn't installed, or its
parsing/expansion is a poor fit. Absence of TaskMaster and the manual flag NEVER
switch atlas-kanban to file mode; use driver-authored candidates and plan/materialize there.
- Generate
.taskmaster/docs/prd.mdnormally. - Manually write
.taskmaster/tasks/tasks.jsonin TaskMaster-compatible shape:- top-level object with
tasks: [] - each task has
id,title,description,details,testStrategy,status,dependencies,priority, andsubtasks - every task has at least 2 subtasks with
id,title,description,status, anddependencies
- top-level object with
- Run:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py validate-tasks python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py enrich-tasks python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py validate-tasks --require-phase-config - Treat successful validation + enrichment + phaseConfig validation as equivalent to TaskMaster parse + expand.
Phase 4: Handoff
Read the phase file and follow it:
Read ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/phases/HANDOFF.mdFor atlas-kanban, follow phases/HANDOFF.md: report canonical IDs/status, doctor diagnostics
and hand acceptance to the parent for its separate reservation/external-session protocol.
For taskmaster-file only, detect capabilities, recommend ONE execution mode, hand off.
Modes (user-facing names):
Verified Loop (recommended when superpowers + a loop runner are present), Auto-Execute
(TaskMaster's native loop), Plan & Drive (plan only). Atlas Fleet — parallel multi-session
execution — appears as an Atlas Pro option when a licensed atlas-launcher is detected;
otherwise it shows as a locked teaser pointing to https://atlas-ai.au/pro. The free engine is
always fully usable on its own.
Gate: atlas-kanban requires canonical IDs/status read back, doctor diagnostics reported and explicit parent handoff. For taskmaster-file only: user chose mode and handoff complete.
Feedback
At debrief time, every executing agent records how the run went. MCP-mode:
<prefix>feedback_submit / <prefix>feedback_report. CLI-mode:
python3 script.py feedback-add --rating <1-5>
--agent <name> --harness <claude-code|codex|gemini|api|other> --task-ref <id>
--well <text> --failed <text> --suggest <text>. Feedback is stored in
.atlas-ai/feedback.jsonl; summarize it with python3 script.py feedback-report.
Engine operations
This table is normative — instruction sites reference operations by name. In MCP-mode use the MCP tool (substitute the Phase-0 prefix); in CLI-mode use the script.py command.
| Operation | MCP tool (MCP-mode) | script.py (CLI-mode / fallback) |
provider-configure | provider_configure | provider-configure --project-root ROOT [--task-provider atlas-kanban|taskmaster-file] [--owner-host HOST] [--board BOARD] |
plan | plan | plan --project-root ROOT --project PROJECT [--prd PATH|--input PATH] [--output PATH] [--previous-plan PATH --prior-mapping PATH] |
materialize | materialize | materialize --project-root ROOT --plan PATH |
doctor | doctor | doctor --project-root ROOT |
import-preview | import_preview | import-preview --project-root ROOT --project PROJECT |
workflow-status | workflow_status | workflow-status --project-root ROOT --task t_ID |
engine-preflight | engine_preflight | engine-preflight |
preflight | preflight | preflight |
detect-taskmaster | detect_taskmaster | detect-taskmaster |
backend-detect | backend_detect | backend-detect |
init | init_project | init-project |
init-taskmaster | init_taskmaster | init-taskmaster |
validate-setup | validate_setup | (covered by engine-preflight) |
detect-capabilities | detect_capabilities | detect-capabilities |
load-template | load_template | load-template --type comprehensive|minimal |
calc-tasks | calc_tasks | calc-tasks --requirements <count> [--scale solo|team|enterprise] |
validate-prd | validate_prd | validate-prd --input <path> |
backup-prd | backup_prd | backup-prd --input <path> |
parse-prd | parse_prd | parse-prd --input <path> --num-tasks N [--tag] |
rate | rate_tasks | rate [--tag] [--no-research] |
expand | expand_tasks | expand [--id N ...] [--no-research] [--tag] |
next | next_task | next-task [--tag] |
set-status | set_task_status | set-status --id <id> --status <status> [--tag] |
fleet-waves | compute_fleet_waves | fleet-waves |
feedback-add | feedback_submit | feedback-add --rating <1-5> ... |
feedback-report | feedback_report | feedback-report |
status | render_status | status [--phase P] [--format boxed|ascii|json] [--all] |
Render the progress panel at each phase boundary (and on demand) via status / render_status
— the boxed phase tracker, validation scorecard, ship-check gates, and execute progress.
Backend behavior is identical through either interface: the taskmaster backend wraps native
TaskMaster operations safely (init/parse/rate/expand); the native
backend uses direct API calls or returns agent_action_required; next/set-status are
engine-native under every backend.
Script/agent-only operations (no MCP tool — always script.py, any mode)
| Command | Purpose |
configure-providers | Configure native Claude/Codex + local Perplexity API Free defaults |
detect-providers | Auto-detect AI providers |
validate-tasks [--input <path>] [--require-phase-config] | Validate manually-authored tasks.json |
enrich-tasks | Add phaseConfig metadata to tasks |
parallel-plan [--missing-only] | Emit per-task research packets for parallel subagents |
parallel-apply --input <results.json> | Merge parallel research results atomically |
parallel-extract --output <path> / parallel-inject --input <path> | Tagged ⇄ flat tasks bridge |
economy-report | Summarize telemetry per (op_class, model) |
Parallel Research & Complexity (taskmaster-file only)
For atlas-kanban, research informs candidates before hashing the plan; do not run these file-store expansion operations. The legacy decision tree below is taskmaster-file only.
Decision tree for expansion + research (token-economy aware):
Manual flag → Native Mode (unchanged)
pending tasks ≤ 3 → TaskMasterBackend.expand internal: serial NATIVE
rate --research, then expand per task (main dir)
task-master ≥ 0.43 AND research
role is a REAL structured API → TaskMasterBackend.expand internal: NATIVE-PARALLEL
(sonar/anthropic/openai… key) one serial analyze-complexity, then N isolated workdirs each running
native `expand --id N --research` with an economy-tier model; ONE
atomic harvest merge. Failed packets → agent-parallel rerun.
free local proxy / no API key /
TM provider errors / TM < 0.43 → native/agent path: AGENT-PARALLEL (fallback):
parallel-plan → N subagents → parallel-applyWhy isolation dirs: task-master 0.43+ uses proper-lockfile + atomic writes, but its 10s lock-stale window vs 30–120s AI calls makes concurrent invocations in ONE directory unsafe — N isolated project dirs sidestep the lock entirely and double as the per-attempt model mechanism (expand has no --model flag; each workdir carries its own config.json). The free local Perplexity proxy returns prose where TaskMaster needs strict JSON — that is why the proxy keeps the agent-normalized path while real APIs get the native path.
Pattern — the parallelism lives in the AGENT, not the script:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py parallel-plan --missing-only # research packets JSON
# AGENT: split packets into N groups (by lane/domain), spawn N parallel research
# subagents; each verifies files in-repo + researches APIs and returns
# [{id, complexityScore, recommendedSubtasks, reasoning, researchNotes, subtasks[]}]
# AGENT: concatenate results -> results.json
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py parallel-apply --input results.json # ONE atomic write
# + writes .taskmaster/reports/task-complexity-report[_<tag>].json (TaskMaster format)
# + returns needs_more_subtasks (score >= threshold w/ too-few subtasks) for a second passIf the perplexity-api-free MCP wrapper times out or says the proxy is unreachable, check direct
proxy health:
curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8765/chat/completions \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"model":"sonar","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Return exactly: ok"}],"max_tokens":16}'If direct curl works, continue: use MCP, direct proxy calls, or agent research to produce the
results.json schema, then normalize prose into valid JSON before parallel-apply. Do not block on
native task-master analyze-complexity --research.
Tag bridge for explicit flat-file workflows (the script also reads tagged TaskMaster files directly):
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py parallel-extract --output /tmp/flat.json
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py validate-tasks --input /tmp/flat.json
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py enrich-tasks --input /tmp/flat.json
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py validate-tasks --input /tmp/flat.json --require-phase-config
python3 ~/.claude/skills/prd-taskmaster/script.py parallel-inject --input /tmp/flat.jsonAll commands default --tag to .taskmaster/state.json currentTag and run from the project root.
Context
Standalone: Works on its own. Takes any goal, produces spec + tasks.
Produces: atlas-kanban: .atlas-ai/prd.md, a hashed plan and canonical owner references,
not a mutable local task store. taskmaster-file only: spec.md + tasks.json in .taskmaster/.
Then: atlas-kanban hands canonical acceptance/IDs to the parent. taskmaster-file hands
off to Verified Loop / Auto-Execute / Plan & Drive, or Atlas Fleet with Atlas Pro.
Critical Rules
- Zero setup questions — detect everything, ask only discovery questions
- Discovery via superpowers:brainstorming — one question at a time, adaptive
- Domain-agnostic — works for any goal (app, pentest, business, anything)
- Validate PRDs catch placeholders — mustache, TBD, TODO patterns fail validation
- Manual flag means driver-authored generation, never skipping validation: atlas-kanban uses candidates + plan/materialize; taskmaster-file only does the TaskMaster mechanics manually.
- Handoff recommends ONE mode — present best fit, not equal choices
- Phase files must be Read explicitly — they are not auto-loaded
- Native/free provider defaults are enforced by
configure-providers; do not drift back to paid Anthropic/Perplexity APIs unless native/free routes are unavailable - Perplexity API Free research must be normalized through
parallel-apply; native TaskMaster research is only acceptable when it returns valid structured output and validation passes - Phase 0 backend resolution is mandatory — in MCP-mode, script.py is forbidden for any op that has an MCP tool in the resolved prefix
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

