executing-plans
Skill3 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute inline in this session, with checkpoints - the non-fleet execution path.
189 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- PabloBuilder/AgenticAxelortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- BrightGold70/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 20 projects that use this
allanninalSkillalgorand-vulnerability-scanner
Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal). (project, gitignored)
Also in 4 projects that use this
allanninalSkillcairo-vulnerability-scanner
Scans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects. (project, gitignored)
Also in 4 projects that use this
farslabSkillaws-agentic-ai
AWS Bedrock AgentCore comprehensive expert for deploying and managing AI agents at scale. Use when working with any AgentCore service including Gateway, Runtime, Memory, Identity, Code Interpreter, Browser, Observability, Agent Registry, or Evaluations. Covers agent deployment, MCP tool integration, credential management, agent discovery, governance workflows, and automated quality assessment. Essential when user mentions AgentCore, agent runtime, agent registry, agent evaluation, MCP gateway, deploy agent, register MCP server, discover agents, evaluate agent quality, agent credentials, or wants to build, deploy, catalog, or monitor AI agents on AWS.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +1 more from allanninal
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- andreymudri/fleetmates★ 3100% same
Edited · 1
- jjsizemore/jjskills★ 112% same
Wrote their own version · 187
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1ksame name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
- koaning/wigglystuff★ 455same name
177 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- brainstormingSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- fleet-lifecycleSkill
- fleetmates-configSkill
- fleet-supervisionSkill
- grillingSkill
- parallel-executionSkill
- phase-gateSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-fleetmatesSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
If the work turns out to be bigger than expected mid-run, hand it to parallel-execution without translating anything — the state is already …
- Distinctive: line 27
Never start implementation on main/master without explicit consent from your human partner.
- Distinctive: line 31
Read it fully before touching code.
- Very specific: line 55
After all tasks are complete and verified, use finishing-a-development-branch (if available) or otherwise confirm tests pass and present …
- Distinctive: line 60
Stop immediately when you hit a blocker (missing dependency, failing test, unclear instruction), when the plan has a gap that prevents …
- Distinctive: line 69
No gate manifest required.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Executing Plans
Adapted from the MIT-licensed superpowers plugin by Jesse Vincent. See NOTICE.md.
Execute a written plan inline, in this session, task by task, checkpointing with your human
partner as you go. This is the counterpart to parallel-execution: same run state, different
cadence. Use using-fleetmates to decide which one applies before reaching for this skill.
1. Initialize the run
node "<fleetmates root>/scripts/cli.mjs" init-run <planPath> --run <runId> --root <project root>This writes .fleetmates/<runId>/plan.json and status.json — the same shared state a fleet
run would write. Because of that:
node "<fleetmates root>/scripts/cli.mjs" digest --run <runId> --root <project root>renders this run unchanged, whether it ran inline or across teammates.fleet-lifecycle resume <runId>can resume it later.- If the work turns out to be bigger than expected mid-run, hand it to
parallel-executionwithout translating anything — the state is already in the shape it expects.
Never start implementation on main/master without explicit consent from your human partner.
2. Review the plan critically
Read it fully before touching code. Raise concerns with your human partner before starting — gaps, unclear steps, or a task that looks bigger than a single sitting.
3. Execute and checkpoint
Work through tasks in dependency order. Follow each step; run the verifications it specifies.
Checkpoint with your human partner per task, or per small batch of related tasks — not automatically per phase the way a fleet gate does, and not silently at the end of the whole plan. Report what changed, what you verified, and any deviation from the plan before moving on.
Gate manifest is optional here
A fleet phase demands a fleetmates.gate.json manifest before it will pass. Inline work does
not need one. When no manifest exists, checkpoint against the plan's own verification steps
instead of demanding one be written first.
Do not require a phase structure, a manifest, or a reviewer dispatch for small inline work.
Ceremony that makes a two-task change expensive is ceremony that gets skipped — and a skipped
skill protects nothing. Reserve that machinery for work that has actually grown into a fleet
(see parallel-execution and phase-gate).
4. Finish
After all tasks are complete and verified, use finishing-a-development-branch (if available)
or otherwise confirm tests pass and present integration options to your human partner.
When to stop and ask for help
Stop immediately when you hit a blocker (missing dependency, failing test, unclear instruction), when the plan has a gap that prevents starting, or when a verification fails repeatedly. Ask rather than guess.
Remember
- Shared state with the fleet path:
.fleetmates/<run-id>/,init-run,digest, resumable viafleet-lifecycle. - Checkpoint per task or per batch, with the user — not per phase, not automated.
- No gate manifest required; the plan's own verification steps stand in for one.
- Scale up to
parallel-executionany time without rewriting state.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

