stale-lore
Skill7 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when the kit's published surface must be reconciled against actual usage in the user's tree. Trigger on "stale-lore", "retira capacidades", "capacidades sin ejercicio", "purge unused skills", or after a major refactoring that renames or replaces published capabilities. Not yours: operating a project's criteria body belongs to transmute-lore; saving one lesson belongs to save-to-lore.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- brainstorming-loreSkill
- create-areaSkill
- create-botSkill
- create-projectSkill
- save-to-loreSkill
- transmute-loreSkill
- use-loreSkill
- vespiSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 100
Run leeCapacidadesCentrales(raiz) against the kit root.
- Distinctive: line 129
When it was withdrawn
- Distinctive: line 156
The user can ignore a withdrawal: If they do, the changelog entry stands as the kit's declaration.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
stale-lore — Retiro declarativo de capacidades sin ejercicio
Invoke with the Skill tool as
stale-lore, or with the phrases «retira capacidades» / «capacidades sin ejercicio» when the published kit surface must be reconciled against actual usage.
The kit announces capabilities — eight skills, contracts, a <!-- lore:always-on --> block — and
those promises accumulate. Some get exercised daily. Others were written for a problem that no
longer exists, or were superseded by a better mechanism. A kit that promises everything and uses
nothing is not a kit: it is a catalog nobody verified.
This skill reconciles promise against evidence. It derives the list of central capabilities from what
the kit publishes, searches the user's tree for proof of exercise, marks each receipt with its
ejercido state, and withdraws the ones that crossed the stale threshold — with a declarative
trace so the withdrawal itself is auditable.
The withdrawal is declarative, not surgical. It writes a changelog entry and marks the receipt. It does not delete the skill from the kit, does not edit the user's
lore/, and does not touch any tree the user owns. If the user ignores the withdrawal, that is their jurisdiction.
The field
ejercidolives in the kernel receipt, not in the skill. This skill writes it as an extension compatible with kernel 0.1.4. Kernel 0.1.5 will read it natively. The contract is{ ejercido: 'ejercido' | 'no-ejercido' | 'stale', ejercicio_en: ISO date }.
Language rule: write every output, index line and changelog entry in the language the target uses (the kit is Spanish, so this skill's output is Spanish). The receipt field
ejercidois Spanish canonical — never rename it to English.
External artifacts: before delivering a user artifact, replace every internal label with the audience's language while preserving its meaning; the final changelog, report or document contains zero internal labels.
Where the capability list comes from
A capability is central when the kit publishes it as a skill: skills/<nombre>/SKILL.md. The
directory is the source — a skill that exists on disk is a published promise. The list is derived
from the tree, never hardcoded: a new skill enters the list the day its SKILL.md lands, and no
list has to be updated by hand.
The contract's <!-- lore:always-on --> block and the README announce the kit, but they do not
define the capability list — they are the surface the list is reconciled against, not its source.
This skill does not trust autodeclaration: a skill that exists on disk but never left its artifact is a promise, not an exercise.
What proves exercise
A capability is exercised when it leaves the artifact it produces in the user's tree. A mention
is not an artifact. A name that appears in active documentation, in a FASES.md line, or in the
capability's own SKILL.md proves nothing about use — the kit's own README names all nine skills
and exercises none of them. Reading a name is not running a capability.
| Capability | The artifact that proves it was exercised |
save-to-lore | a Pista (**Pista**) in lore/ |
use-lore | the <!-- lore:always-on --> block in a contract |
transmute-lore | a crystallization in cristalizaciones/, or a .lore-mycelium marker |
brainstorming-lore | an agreement in specs/ |
create-area | a tree with lore/ and proyectos/ |
create-bot | a tree with canon/, lore/ and CLAUDE.md |
vespi | a receipt in .lore/receipts/ or a recibo in operations/ |
create-project | no detector declared |
stale-lore | no detector declared — it measures; it is not measured |
A capability without a declared detector is never declared stale. This skill does not assert
what it did not measure. Reporting sinDetector is a result, not a gap: it says «the kit has not
decided what artifact this capability leaves», which is a decision for the kit's owner, not a
verdict from this skill.
A FASES.md mention is not exercise. It is the exact false green this skill exists to avoid:
a tree can name every capability in its state file and have exercised none.
The ejercido field
The kernel receipt carries a field named ejercido with three possible values:
| Value | Meaning |
ejercido | Receipt exists and is within the threshold |
no-ejercido | Receipt exists but the capability was declared unused by a human decision |
stale | No receipt within the threshold, or no receipt at all |
This skill writes the field with marcaEjercido(recibo, estado). It returns a copy of the
receipt — never mutates the original. Kernel 0.1.5 will read this field natively; in 0.1.4 it
travels as a compatible extension.
The withdrawal flow
The default threshold is 7 days (STALE_POR_DEFECTO_DIAS). Configurable per invocation.
Move 1 — Derive central capabilities
Run leeCapacidadesCentrales(raiz) against the kit root. This reads skills/<nombre>/SKILL.md and
returns a sorted list. If the tree has no skills/, the list is empty — no capability is invented.
Move 2 — Search exercise trace
For each capability, run buscaRastroCapacidad(capacidad, raiz, { ahora }). This runs the
capability's detector against the user's tree and returns { encontrado, ultimoUso, fuentes,
sinDetector }. A capability with encontrado: false and sinDetector: false was never
exercised; one with sinDetector: true has no detector and is not evaluated.
Move 3 — Verify stale state
For each capability, run verificaStale(capacidad, { encontrado, ultimoUso, sinDetector, umbralDias, ahora }).
Returns { stale, dias, nuncaEjercida, umbral, sinDetector }. A capability is stale when its detector
ran, found no artifact, and the threshold has passed. It is not stale when sinDetector is true —
there is nothing to measure against.
Move 4 — Mark receipts
For each stale capability, run marcaEjercido(recibo, 'stale') against its receipt file. For
capabilities within threshold, mark ejercido. This step is a copy — the original receipt is
not mutated; the updated copy is written back.
Move 5 — Execute withdrawal
For each stale capability, ejecutaRetiro(raiz, entradas) writes a ## Capacidades retiradas
section to CHANGELOG.md with:
- What was withdrawn
- When it was withdrawn
- How many days without exercise
- Why (no trace, or last trace N days ago)
- Migration path if a replacement exists, or
sin soporteif not
The withdrawal does not delete the skill. It writes a changelog entry and marks the receipt. The skill remains on disk; the changelog declares it unmaintained.
The orchestrator
ejecutaStaleLore(raiz, opciones) runs the full cycle. Returns { evaluadas, retiros, dryRun }.
With dryRun: true it evaluates and reports without writing anything. Use it for a first pass
before committing the withdrawal.
When to use
- Scheduled pass — run weekly or per-version to reconcile the kit's published surface.
- After a major refactoring — when capabilities were renamed or replaced.
- Before a release — the kit's published promises must match its exercised surface.
- When the kit bloats — the symptom of a capability nobody invokes is the same as PRUNE's, but
scoped to the kit itself rather than the user's
lore/.
Boundaries
- This skill does not edit the user's
lore/. That istransmute-loreterritory. - This skill does not save lessons. That is
save-to-loreterritory. - This skill does not edit contracts. It reads them for capability names; it never writes them.
- The user can ignore a withdrawal. If they do, the changelog entry stands as the kit's declaration; the user owns the decision to keep or remove the capability from their own tree.
- A capability that is published but never exercised is stale, not broken. This skill does not judge quality — only exercise.
What earns a withdrawal
| Condition | Action |
| Detector ran, no artifact ever | Withdraw with nunca-ejercida: true |
| Detector ran, last artifact > threshold | Withdraw with days count |
| Replacement capability exists | Withdraw with migration path |
| Replacement does not exist | Withdraw with sin soporte |
| Detector found the artifact | Mark ejercido, no withdrawal |
| No detector declared | Report sinDetector; never withdraw |
The capability is stale-lore itself | Never withdraw — it measures, it is not measured |
The diasSinUso of a withdrawal is a measured number or null. It is never a placeholder: an
invented figure (999) is the same lie this skill exists to catch.
The contract with kernel 0.1.5
Kernel 0.1.5 will expose ejercido as a first-class receipt field. When that lands, this skill's
marcaEjercido function aligns with the native contract — no migration needed. Until then, the
field travels as an extension and is written by this skill, not the kernel.
The shape the kernel will accept:
{
"capability": "use-lore",
"status": "verified",
"at": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z",
"ejercido": "ejercido",
"ejercido_en": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z"
}Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

