agentleFS
anarefinanarefin/ai-agent-skills/fix-dev-reviews/SKILL.md

fix-dev-reviews

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Fourth-pass closer for an EARS specification file produced by /springboot-to-ears. Consumes the two developer-review sections a human filled in directly in the spec — `## Review by Developer (code)` (source-code pointers to rules — or whole entities/enums — missing from the spec) and `## Review by Developer (business requirements)` (business decisions needing a human answer). For each unchecked entry it investigates the referenced code, writes a reviewable report, and — only after the user approves — folds confident findings in as code-free EARS statements, adds any missing entity/enum-state as a new `### <Name>` block (with all properties) in Domain Entities / Domain Concepts, and turns ambiguous findings and all business-requirement entries into [NEEDS REVIEW] Open Questions, then checks the entry off and annotates where it landed (module/subsection, entity/concept block, or Open Question) plus the EARS line number. Each `## Module:` and content `### Subsection` in the input carries a `> **Source files:**` annotation (springboot-to-ears Rule 14) which this skill preserves, uses as a supplemental locate hint, and keeps accurate. Trigger when the user types `/fix-dev-reviews <path-to-EARS-file>` (controller path(s) may be passed as an optional override).

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.