agentleFS
amurthygithubamurthygithub/Audit-skills/skills/audit-workpapers/SKILL.md

audit-workpapers

Skill9 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create, organize, evaluate, and review audit workpapers per PCAOB AS 1215, AS 2315, AS 1105, and AS 3105, AICPA AU-C 230, ISA 230, COSO ICIF-2013, and ISACA ITAF. Use when asked to draft workpapers, design sampling plans (MUS/attribute/variables), document audit evidence, write findings in 5-part format, compute sample sizes or upper limits on misstatement, structure tickmark systems, perform audit risk model calculations, determine audit opinions, or build cross-reference tables, document material weaknesses, or prepare ICFR draft reports and management letters.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every workpaper receives a unique alphanumeric index: A=Permanent File, B=Planning & Risk, C=Internal Control, D=Revenue, E=Expenditures, …

    line 75
  2. Distinctive:

    Use cases (load matching file from use-cases/): UC-01 (MUS sampling AR), UC-02 (5-part finding), UC-03 (TD calculation).

    line 186
  3. Very specific:

    Document evidence -> chunks/02-evidence-and-reperformance.md

    line 191
  4. Very specific:

    Write findings -> chunks/05-finding-and-workflow.md

    line 194
  5. Very specific:

    Use templates -> chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.md

    line 195

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

You are an expert audit agent performing PCAOB / AICPA / ISA / ISACA-compliant audit workpaper work. Use official standards terminology exclusively.

Audit Workpapers Skill (Router)

This SKILL.md is a router. The deep-dive content lives in chunks/. Load the chunks that match the user's intent. See section 11 Routing for the table.

1. When to Use / Not Use This Skill

Use This Skill When:

  • Creating, organizing, indexing, or reviewing any audit workpaper
  • Designing sampling plans (attribute, MUS/PPS, variables, non-statistical, dual-purpose)
  • Documenting audit evidence, re-performance, or re-computation
  • Writing audit findings in the 5-part C-C-C-E-R format
  • Computing sample sizes, upper limits on misstatement, or projected misstatements
  • Building tickmark legends, cross-reference tables, or lead schedules
  • Performing audit risk model calculations (AR = IR x CR x AP x TD)
  • Determining audit opinions (unqualified, qualified, adverse, disclaimer)
  • Preparing engagement completion documents (per AS 1215.13)
  • Ensuring compliance with PCAOB, AICPA, ISA, or ISACA documentation standards
  • Evaluating electronic workpaper controls, retention, or sign-off protocols
  • Integrating data analytics or ML-enhanced sampling into audit documentation
  • Reusing audit workpaper evidence for customer security questionnaires (CAIQ, SIG Lite, VSAQ).
  • Using the board-ready audit committee deck template (see aicpa-soc-reporting/assets/board_deck_template.md).

Do NOT Use This Skill When:

  • The task is purely tax preparation (different standards apply)
  • The task is a forensic investigation outside an audit engagement
  • The task involves advisory/consulting services with no audit documentation requirements
  • The task is a SOC 1/SOC 2 examination (use SOC-specific skills instead)
  • The user is asking about financial statement preparation (not an audit task)

2. Framework Overview

The audit workpapers skill encodes PCAOB, AICPA, IAASB (ISA), and ISACA documentation standards into a single executable playbook.

LayerDocumentRole
Documentation[PCAOB-AS-1215] / [AICPA-AU-C-230] / [IAASB-ISA-230]Workpaper content, retention, review, completion
Evidence[PCAOB-AS-1105] / AU-C 500 / ISA 500Evidence types, hierarchy, reliability, assertions
Sampling[PCAOB-AS-2315] / AU-C 530 / ISA 530Statistical/nonstatistical, MUS, attribute, variables
RiskAS 1101 / [PCAOB-AS-2110] / AS 2301Audit risk model (AR = IR x CR x AP x TD)
Opinion[PCAOB-AS-3105] / AS 3101Unqualified, qualified, adverse, disclaimer
Internal Control[PCAOB-AS-2201] / [COSO-ICIF-2013]Material weakness, significant deficiency
Deficiency Communication[PCAOB-AS-1305]Communication to audit committee and management
IT Audit[ISACA-ITAF]IT-specific workpaper standards, CAATs
QualityQC 1000 / AS 1220 / AS 1201Firm QC, EQR, supervisory review

Regulatory updates (2024-2026): QC 1000 eff. Dec 2025; [PCAOB-AS-1215] amendments eff. Dec 2026; [PCAOB-AS-2315] amendment eff. Dec 2026; COSO 2026 GenAI guidance.

3. Core Concepts

3.1 Workpaper Indexing (A-N)

Every workpaper receives a unique alphanumeric index: A=Permanent File, B=Planning & Risk, C=Internal Control, D=Revenue, E=Expenditures, F=Assets, G=Liabilities, H=Equity, I=Sampling, J=Analytical Procedures, K=Completion, L=Communications, M=Quality Review, N=Specialty Areas. See chunks/01-standards-and-structure.md.

3.2 Three Mandatory Elements (AS 1215.04)

Purpose, source, conclusion. See chunks/01-standards-and-structure.md for 5W1H framework and experienced auditor standard.

3.3 Tickmark System

8 standard tickmarks. See chunks/01-standards-and-structure.md.

3.4 Evidence Hierarchy

External > internal. Written > oral. See chunks/02-evidence-and-reperformance.md.

3.5 Sampling Methods

Attribute, MUS/PPS, variables, non-statistical, dual-purpose. See chunks/03-sampling.md.

3.6 Audit Risk Model

AR = IR x CR x AP x TD. See chunks/04-risk-and-opinion.md.

3.7 Five-Part Finding Format

C-C-C-E-R (Condition, Criteria, Cause, Effect, Recommendation). See chunks/05-finding-and-workflow.md.

3.8 Substantive Analytical Procedures

Expectation modeling, tolerable difference, variance analysis. See chunks/09-substantive-analytical-procedures.md.

4. Decision Logic (summary)

Full logic in chunks. Quick-ref:

  • Workpaper completeness -> chunks/01-standards-and-structure.md
  • Sample method -> 100% > specific items > statistical vs non-stat > attribute/MUS/variables -> chunks/03-sampling.md
  • MUS evaluation -> ULM = BP + Incremental Allowances -> chunks/03-sampling.md
  • Risk model -> compute TD from IR, CR, AP -> chunks/04-risk-and-opinion.md
  • Opinion -> scope limited? GAAP departure? material/pervasive? -> chunks/04-risk-and-opinion.md
  • IPE gating -> classify source x purpose -> chunks/02-evidence-and-reperformance.md
  • Analytical procedures -> build expectation, set tolerable difference, investigate variance -> chunks/09-substantive-analytical-procedures.md

5. Procedure Templates (summary)

  • 7-step workflow -> chunks/05-finding-and-workflow.md
  • Sampling plan -> chunks/03-sampling.md
  • Re-performance / re-computation -> chunks/02-evidence-and-reperformance.md
  • Quality checklist -> chunks/07-qc-compliance-cross-refs.md
  • Substantive analytical procedure -> chunks/09-substantive-analytical-procedures.md

6. Output Templates (summary)

  • Standard workpaper template -> chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.md
  • Sampling workpaper template -> chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.md
  • Finding documentation template -> chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.md
  • Engagement completion document -> chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.md
  • IPE validation log -> chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.md
  • Substantive analytical procedures workpaper template -> chunks/09-substantive-analytical-procedures.md

7. Cross-References (summary)

Internal: nist-800-53-rmf, isaca-audit-methodology, coso-internal-controls, aicpa-soc-reporting. External crosswalks in chunks/07-qc-compliance-cross-refs.md.

8. Worked Examples (high-level)

Full worked examples in use-cases/.

UCTitleIndustryKey output
UC-01MUS sampling workpaper for accounts receivablefinancial-servicesMUS plan, ULM, conclusion
UC-025-part finding for AP cutoff control gapfinancial-services, public-sectorC-C-C-E-R finding, severity
UC-03Audit risk model TD calculationfinancial-servicesTD computed from IR, CR, AP

9. Anti-Hallucination Disclaimers

  • PCAOB standards reorganization — paragraph numbers may have shifted post-2024. Verify against current PCAOB publications.
  • AS 1215 amendments (.09/.11) — effective Dec 15, 2026 per PCAOB Release No. 2024-005.
  • Sample size tables — illustrative. Use statistical formulas or audit software for engagement-level precision.
  • MUS worked examples — rounding differences up to $1 are immaterial.
  • ML/sequential sampling — based on arXiv preprints; emerging methodologies. Validate against current professional standards.
  • Opinion determination — requires professional judgment.

This skill encodes domain knowledge; it is not a substitute for professional judgment. Always verify outputs against the cited authoritative source.

10. References & Citation Manifest

LabelTitlePublisherIdentifierRetrievalURL
PCAOB-AS-1215Audit DocumentationPCAOBAS 12152026-05-25https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS1215
PCAOB-AS-1105Audit EvidencePCAOBAS 11052026-05-25https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS1105
PCAOB-AS-2315Audit SamplingPCAOBAS 23152026-05-25https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS2315
PCAOB-AS-3105Departures from Unqualified OpinionsPCAOBAS 31052026-05-25https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS3105
PCAOB-AS-2110Identifying and Assessing RisksPCAOBAS 21102026-05-25https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS2110
PCAOB-AS-2201Audit of ICFRPCAOBAS 22012026-05-25https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS2201
PCAOB-AS-1305Communications About Control DeficienciesPCAOBAS 13052026-06-08https://pcaobus.org/oversight/standards/auditing-standards/details/AS1305
AICPA-AU-C-230Audit DocumentationAICPAAU-C 2302026-05-25https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/landing/au-c-section-230
IAASB-ISA-230Audit DocumentationIAASBISA 230 (in the 2023-2024 IAASB Handbook, Vol 1)2026-06-10https://www.iaasb.org/publications/2023-2024-handbook-international-quality-management-auditing-review-other-assurance-and-related
COSO-ICIF-2013Internal Control Integrated FrameworkCOSO20132026-05-25https://www.coso.org/guidance-on-ic
ISACA-ITAFIT Audit Framework (ITAF), 5th EditionISACA5th Ed (2026)2026-06-10https://www.isaca.org/resources/it-audit

In-body citations use the form [LABEL section] and resolve to this manifest.

11. Routing

User intentLoad chunk(s)Industry hintUse case
"Workpaper structure" / "indexing" / "tickmarks" / "AS 1215" / "sign-off"chunks/01-standards-and-structure.mdmatch industry-
"Evidence hierarchy" / "AS 1105" / "re-performance" / "IPE validation" / "recomputation"chunks/02-evidence-and-reperformance.mdmatch industry-
"Sampling plan" / "MUS" / "attribute sampling" / "variables" / "ULM"chunks/03-sampling.mdmatch industryUC-01
"Audit risk model" / "AR = IR x CR" / "TD calculation" / "opinion" / "material weakness"chunks/04-risk-and-opinion.mdmatch industryUC-03
"Audit finding" / "C-C-C-E-R" / "workflow" / "7-step" / "draft a report"chunks/05-finding-and-workflow.mdmatch industryUC-02
"Workpaper templates" / "electronic workpapers" / "retention" / "review"chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.mdmatch industry-
"Quality checklist" / "compliance" / "cross-reference" / "glossary"chunks/07-qc-compliance-cross-refs.mdmatch industry-
"Full audit engagement"chunks/01,02,03,04,05,06,07financial-servicesUC-01, UC-02
"CAIQ" / "SIG Lite" / "VSAQ" / "customer questionnaire" / "workpaper evidence reuse"chunks/08-questionnaire-reuse.mdmatch industry-
"High-level question"this SKILL.md only--

Industries (load matching file from industries/): financial-services, public-sector, saas-technology, healthcare, other. Use cases (load matching file from use-cases/): UC-01 (MUS sampling AR), UC-02 (5-part finding), UC-03 (TD calculation).

12. Operational Quick-Reference

  1. Structure the workpaper -> chunks/01-standards-and-structure.md
  2. Document evidence -> chunks/02-evidence-and-reperformance.md
  3. Design sampling -> chunks/03-sampling.md
  4. Assess risk / opinion -> chunks/04-risk-and-opinion.md
  5. Write findings -> chunks/05-finding-and-workflow.md
  6. Use templates -> chunks/06-outputs-electronic-review.md
  7. Validate quality -> chunks/07-qc-compliance-cross-refs.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.