pressure-benchmarking
Skill2 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Calibrate meters, raise load, ratchet resource ceilings, and run at least ten optimize/prove pressure-cooker cycles against named series. Use when asked for pressure benchmarking, load stepping, resource ratchet, performance pressure testing, delivery budget tighten, or a pressure cooker optimize loop. Do not use for one-shot upgrade deltas, continuous ship-path CI budgets alone, or pure documentation edits with no executable path.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-artifactSkill
- agent-discoverySkill
- agent-run-supervisionSkill
- api-contract-migrationSkill
- changelog-updateSkill
- change-reviewSkill
- ci-reviewSkill
- claims-auditSkill
- dependency-auditSkill
- derivation-auditSkill
- durable-cacheSkill
- engineering-auditSkill
- infer-conventionsSkill
- operational-signal-intakeSkill
- planned-releaseSkill
- preferred-stackSkill
- public-surface-reconSkill
- rfc-processSkill
- security-auditSkill
- session-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use when the person asks to raise load, tighten resource budgets, prove a hot path stays near-linear, or drive optimizations against …
- Distinctive: line 38
do not claim stage RSS without an isolated probe
- Very specific: line 40
Read references/pressure-loop.md before changing ceilings or claiming cheaper.
- Very specific: line 41
Read references/known-practices.md for layered gates, noise floor, and stop criteria.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pressure benchmarking
When to use
Use when the person asks to raise load, tighten resource budgets, prove a hot path stays near-linear, or drive optimizations against measured ceilings rather than intuition.
Skip for pure documentation or contract edits with no executable path, and say
so. Route one-change dependency base/head deltas to dependency-audit upgrade
resource compare. Route continuous ship-path absolute size and build-timing
gates to delivery-budgets. Route utilization review claims to engineering-audit
resource and budget mode.
Quick reference
calibrate meter -> baseline -> stress -> tighten -> (optimize -> prove) x N -> accept|rollbackRules that fail the episode if skipped:
- calibrate before baseline (stage-distinct self-test; uncalibrated is not a baseline)
- name one primary series before each optimize cycle; change only that series until prove
- samples-per-load >= 3 for gate, propose, and write; n=1 is observe only
- episode iterations N >= 10 before accept (pressure cooker); one green prove is not enough
- do not claim stage RSS without an isolated probe
Read references/pressure-loop.md before changing ceilings or claiming cheaper.
Read references/known-practices.md for layered gates, noise floor, and stop criteria.
Binding (consumer)
Record next to development process docs when the tree has local measure commands:
- measure command that prints stable samples
- self-test command with distinct known p95 per named stage
- ceilings file path
- load axis definition
- samples-per-load default (>= 3)
- min episode iterations (>= 10)
- propose-basis per series (
medianormax, times headroom; default headroom 1.15) - Memory probe class (
process_lifetimeorisolated_stage) - gate / propose / write command flags
Absent a binding, the agent still runs calibrate and the minimum series with explicit one-off commands and records them in the live-work note.
Related
- engineering-audit resource and budget mode - utilization claims; prioritized candidates for the loop
- engineering-audit performance mode - wait-time claims
- dependency-audit upgrade resource compare - base/head deltas for lockfile or runtime-pin changes
- delivery-budgets - continuous ship-path absolute size and build-timing gates
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

