agentleFS
amkiskoamkisko/prayers/.agents/skills/pressure-benchmarking/SKILL.md

pressure-benchmarking

Skill2 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Calibrate meters, raise load, ratchet resource ceilings, and run at least ten optimize/prove pressure-cooker cycles against named series. Use when asked for pressure benchmarking, load stepping, resource ratchet, performance pressure testing, delivery budget tighten, or a pressure cooker optimize loop. Do not use for one-shot upgrade deltas, continuous ship-path CI budgets alone, or pure documentation edits with no executable path.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use when the person asks to raise load, tighten resource budgets, prove a hot path stays near-linear, or drive optimizations against …

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    do not claim stage RSS without an isolated probe

    line 38
  3. Very specific:

    Read references/pressure-loop.md before changing ceilings or claiming cheaper.

    line 40
  4. Very specific:

    Read references/known-practices.md for layered gates, noise floor, and stop criteria.

    line 41

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Pressure benchmarking

When to use

Use when the person asks to raise load, tighten resource budgets, prove a hot path stays near-linear, or drive optimizations against measured ceilings rather than intuition.

Skip for pure documentation or contract edits with no executable path, and say so. Route one-change dependency base/head deltas to dependency-audit upgrade resource compare. Route continuous ship-path absolute size and build-timing gates to delivery-budgets. Route utilization review claims to engineering-audit resource and budget mode.

Quick reference

calibrate meter -> baseline -> stress -> tighten -> (optimize -> prove) x N -> accept|rollback

Rules that fail the episode if skipped:

  • calibrate before baseline (stage-distinct self-test; uncalibrated is not a baseline)
  • name one primary series before each optimize cycle; change only that series until prove
  • samples-per-load >= 3 for gate, propose, and write; n=1 is observe only
  • episode iterations N >= 10 before accept (pressure cooker); one green prove is not enough
  • do not claim stage RSS without an isolated probe

Read references/pressure-loop.md before changing ceilings or claiming cheaper. Read references/known-practices.md for layered gates, noise floor, and stop criteria.

Binding (consumer)

Record next to development process docs when the tree has local measure commands:

  • measure command that prints stable samples
  • self-test command with distinct known p95 per named stage
  • ceilings file path
  • load axis definition
  • samples-per-load default (>= 3)
  • min episode iterations (>= 10)
  • propose-basis per series (median or max, times headroom; default headroom 1.15)
  • Memory probe class (process_lifetime or isolated_stage)
  • gate / propose / write command flags

Absent a binding, the agent still runs calibrate and the minimum series with explicit one-off commands and records them in the live-work note.

Related

  • engineering-audit resource and budget mode - utilization claims; prioritized candidates for the loop
  • engineering-audit performance mode - wait-time claims
  • dependency-audit upgrade resource compare - base/head deltas for lockfile or runtime-pin changes
  • delivery-budgets - continuous ship-path absolute size and build-timing gates

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.