github-pr-review
Skill8 starsChanged 7 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Review an existing GitHub pull request and return or publish evidence-backed P0/P1/P2 findings.
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Bruno-Cunha-Souza/ValarMindSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- myths-labs/musetheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- y-miyazaki/configtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- runxhq/runxtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- gianpaj/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- ricoberger/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Oct 10, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use git-commit, code-review and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillgit-commit
Stage user-selected paths, confirm the exact staged set, and create one local Conventional Commit, or generate a commit message for staged changes without committing. Use when you want a guarded commit or a ready-to-paste message.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillfrontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillskill-creator
Create new agent skills following the Agent Skills specification. Use when asked to "create a skill", "add a new skill", "write a skill", "make a skill", "build a skill", or scaffold a new skill with SKILL.md. Guides through requirements, writing, registration, and verification.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- google/adk-recipes★ 11ksame name
- google/adk-samples★ 11ksame name
- OpenHands/extensions★ 167same name
- runxhq/runx★ 97same name
- myths-labs/muse★ 38same name
- ricoberger/dotfiles★ 19same name
- Bruno-Cunha-Souza/ValarMindSkills★ 5same name
- Cogni-AI-OU/cogni-ai-agent-skills★ 4same name
- megandmartin/agent-skills-repo★ 3same name
- 17-sss/agent-skills★ 2same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- local-code-reviewSkill
- review-backendSkill
- review-coreSkill
- review-deep-investigationSkill
- review-frontendSkill
- review-publish-githubSkill
- review-requirementsSkill
- review-runtime-checkSkill
- review-securitySkill
- review-suggestionsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
When the user asks to review a pull request, run review-core on that PR and return its report.
- Distinctive: line 22
If a required Skill is not installed, stop and ask the user to install it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
github-pr-review
Compatibility entrypoint for the v2 name. It reviews a GitHub pull request
by delegating to review-core.
When the user asks to review a pull request, run review-core on that PR
and return its report. Everything else — scope, severity, evidence, the
decision and the safety guarantees — is review-core's and is not
restated here.
This Skill never publishes on its own. Posting a review to GitHub happens
only when the user explicitly asks for it in this conversation, and is
handled by review-publish-github.
Requires review-core; publishing also requires review-publish-github.
If a required Skill is not installed, stop and ask the user to install it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.