arxiv-watcher
Skill48 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Monitor ArXiv for new papers by topic, author, or keyword. Use when the user wants to track research papers, find recent publications, or stay current on a field.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Daisybastioned440/lite-research-agentstheir own version, first seen Mar 28, 2026
- stvlynn/qclaw-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 21, 2026
- kunwl123456/zeroclaw-skills-collectiontheir own version, first seen Feb 19, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- kunwl123456/zeroclaw-skills-collection★ 27same name
- stvlynn/qclaw-skills★ 4same name
- Daisybastioned440/lite-research-agents★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-hardeningSkill
- api-builderSkill
- data-analystSkill
- diagram-makerSkill
- docker-managerSkill
- github-workflowSkill
- google-workspaceSkill
- hermeshub-reviewerSkill
- hermes-workspaceSkill
- notion-integrationSkill
- paperclipSkill
- project-plannerSkill
- react-reasoningSkill
- relay-for-telegramSkill
- scraplingSkill
- security-auditorSkill
- Skill FactorySkill
- slack-botSkill
- synapse-swarmSkill
- test-runnerSkill
- web-researcherSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 60
Search results may include older revised papers
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ArXiv Watcher
Research paper monitoring and summarization.
When to Use
- User wants to find recent papers on a topic
- User asks to monitor specific authors or subjects
- User needs paper summaries or trend analysis
- User maintains a research reading list
Procedure
- Parse the user's research interest (topic, authors, keywords)
- Query ArXiv API with appropriate search parameters
- Filter by date range and relevance
- Summarize each paper (title, authors, abstract, key contribution)
- Score relevance to user's stated interests
- Present results sorted by relevance
ArXiv API Usage
import urllib.request
import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
base_url = 'http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?'
query = 'search_query=all:transformer+attention&sortBy=submittedDate&sortOrder=descending&max_results=10'
response = urllib.request.urlopen(base_url + query)
feed = ET.parse(response)Output Format
For each paper:
- Title: [paper title]
- Authors: [author list]
- Submitted: [date]
- ArXiv ID: [id with link]
- Summary: 2-3 sentence summary of key contribution
- Relevance: High/Medium/Low
Monitoring (with Hermes cron)
Set up scheduled monitoring:
/cron daily at 8am: Check ArXiv for new papers on [topics] and summarize any relevant onesPitfalls
- ArXiv API has rate limits — max 1 request per 3 seconds
- Search results may include older revised papers
- Abstract summaries may miss nuanced contributions
- Some preprints are later withdrawn or significantly revised
Verification
- Paper links resolve to valid ArXiv pages
- Dates match the requested time range
- Relevance scoring matches user's stated interests
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

