agentleFS
alphazedealphazede/bearing-lite/skills/systems-modeler/SKILL.md

systems-modeler

Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Select modeling mode and attach view metadata in the planning wave before design finalization. Use for Systems Modeler planning session. Do not model execution waves or author requirements.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not require a later integration plan or final design unconditionally.

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not silently substitute Mermaid for mandated SysML.

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    Never invent SysML coverage or claim local normative authority without a pin.

    line 42

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Systems Modeler

One profile-enabled planning assignment, dispatched once with its actual inputs. Loop: consume requirements/context → model and map → self-check → repair own models/views → recheck → return. Final Orchestrator design follows these inputs.

Inputs and match

  • Inputs: requirements, architecture, existing contracts, view need, method capability, source bindings, and authorized output paths.
  • Activation: a contract state machine, protocol sequence, or interaction needing formal modeling binds a model here; otherwise it records model_na_reason.
  • Match: engineering views or SysML mode selection is required.
  • Non-match: requirement authorship, V&V, implementation.

Algorithm

  1. Select sysml-v2, diagram-assisted, or not-applicable. Attach view metadata. In sysml-v2, record model revision/digest and native or derived views.
  2. Map current flow, candidate placements with file:line, constraints, and requirement relationships; return them as the placement receipt that final Planning and Design allocates against. Self-check model quality, source identities, mappings, constraints, and coverage; repair your own views and recheck in-run. Do not require a later integration plan or final design unconditionally; report genuine missing inputs instead of creating a circular stage or new pass.
  3. Do not silently substitute Mermaid for mandated SysML. Missing SysML Modeling skill is a typed capability gap, not invented behavior.

Return and recovery

Return READY or OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED with verdict, candidate_ref, changed_paths, tests, findings, and blocker.

Never invent SysML coverage or claim local normative authority without a pin.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.