run-evaluation
Skill677 starsChanged 8 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Run, debug, and scale VLA evaluations in vla-eval while preserving evaluation conditions and verifying complete results.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- leaderboard/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- add-benchmarkSkill
- add-model-serverSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
Verify checkpoint/auxiliary files, assets, image, and code actually executed.
- Very specific: line 26
Use --dev for local benchmark edits or rebuild.
- Very specific: line 30
Use allocated CPU/GPU resources and the permitted runtime.
- Very specific: line 32
Check server readiness via HTTP 200 from /health and connectivity from the benchmark runtime.
- Very specific: line 63
Read docs/tuning-guide.md and check current controls before tuning.
- Very specific: line 83
Prefer the existing helper when suitable.
- Very specific: line 109
Check expected versus recorded task/episode identities, missing/duplicate/errored episodes, worker completion, aggregation, and the score …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run an evaluation
Work from the target harness checkout. Read AGENTS.md, configs/README.md, and
the selected model/benchmark notes. Discover configs with
rg --files configs/model_servers configs/benchmarks. Use the relevant sections;
a validated setup need not be re-integrated.
1. Evaluation plan
Specify checkpoint/revision, benchmark version, tasks/variations, episodes, seeds, and initialization. Match observations, controller/actions, horizon, and replanning to the intended comparison; record deliberate differences.
Define expected work, recording needs, and a distinct output directory. Separate
smoke-run completion from reproduction evidence. docs/reproductions/running-guide.md
contains examples, not universal hardware allocations or verdict thresholds.
2. Preflight
- Verify checkpoint/auxiliary files, assets, image, and code actually executed.
Use
--devfor local benchmark edits or rebuild; keep model dependencies isolated. - Resolve asset roots through
src/vla_eval/dirs.pyand config mounts. Check paths on the consuming host; server and benchmark may not share storage. Reuse caches, coordinate acquisition, and provide writable scratch/output space and disk capacity. - Use allocated CPU/GPU resources and the permitted runtime. Consult
docs/runtimes.mdordocs/render-backends.mdwhen changing either; follow local policies. - Check server readiness via HTTP 200 from
/healthand connectivity from the benchmark runtime. Loading and first-inference compilation are separate phases; allow justified warm-up without masking a stall.
3. Baseline run
For an unfamiliar setup, run a small representative workload in separate terminals or managed processes:
# Server process; keep running during evaluation.
uv run vla-eval serve -c <model-config>
# Benchmark process, after the health check succeeds.
uv run vla-eval run -c <benchmark-config> \
--server-url ws://<server-host>:<port> --output-dir <run-directory>Set actual task/episode counts through supported config/CLI options. Inspect images, state, actions, reset, termination, and recordings across relevant task paths and consecutive episodes.
Diagnose the first failing boundary: setup → observations → preprocessing/inference → action application → success/termination → recording. Compare with upstream; normal process exit, low scores, or matching shapes alone do not locate the problem. For matched runs, compare representative initial states rather than assuming equal seeds guarantee equal starts. Record remaining nondeterminism.
4. Throughput tuning
Optimize valid completed episodes per time/resource under the same conditions.
Read docs/tuning-guide.md and check current controls before tuning.
| Step | What to measure or change |
| Locate the bottleneck | Environment demand and serving capacity; rendering, CPU contention, GPU memory, latency, recording I/O. Use experiments/bench_demand.py and experiments/bench_supply.py for dedicated probes. |
| Increase concurrency | Sweep independent shards and supported batch sizes incrementally; bound resources/threads and tune batch waiting against latency. Leave headroom. |
| Judge the result | Total wall time, valid-episode throughput, worker imbalance, and errors. Stop scaling when throughput plateaus or latency/errors grow. |
Separate cold start from steady state, requests from model forward passes under chunking, and environment setup from rollout. Failures can run to the horizon: changes in success mix may distort timing comparisons. Inspect current work assignment rather than assuming fixed episode counts per shard.
Preserve episode identity, reset, and session isolation. Do not silently change inputs, precision, inference steps, action horizon, control frequency, or episode limits for speed. In live/latency-sensitive evaluation, serving delays and the runner's timing/hold-action semantics are part of the measured conditions.
5. Full run and recovery
Prefer the existing helper when suitable; inspect its current options. Set
server.url in the benchmark config, then choose a measured shard count:
uv run bash scripts/run_sharded.sh -c <benchmark-config> \
-n <shards> -o <run-directory>The helper shares an eval ID and exports after workers exit. Manual shards must
share --eval-id and recording destination; independent evaluations use distinct
destinations. Shared SQLite recording requires working filesystem locks and sync.
Monitor expected work, episode errors, and worker exits. Episode failures need not stop the process. Before retrying, inspect completed/unfinished work and current queue/recording semantics to avoid duplicate execution or overwritten results. Preserve diagnostic logs and stop only this run's jobs/processes.
6. Results and reporting
The authoritative recording is recording-<eval-id>.sqlite. Single-shard runs export
automatically; for manual export:
uv run vla-eval export <recording.sqlite> -o <export-directory>Check expected versus recorded task/episode identities, missing/duplicate/errored episodes, worker completion, aggregation, and the score denominator. An export may be a snapshot of an incomplete run. Distinguish task failures from infrastructure errors and disclose their treatment.
Report scores, episode/error counts, deviations, checkpoint and code/image provenance, resource use, and recording/log locations. Separate smoke validation from reproduction; executed results do not belong in the paper-reported leaderboard.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

