write-script
Skill54 starsChanged 36 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Write or critique hooks and scripts for Reels, TikToks and YouTube Shorts from an idea, saved reel or reference. Adapt proven openings, write one opening or several to test plus one shared body in the creator's voice, and hand the editor a filmable brief.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- berkayburakk/tubecrewtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- giacomo-ciro/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 24, 2026
- maciekuc94/sensum-ai-pipelinetheir own version, first seen Jun 13, 2026
- Heuresis/YouTube-Agencytheir own version, first seen Jun 11, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- Heuresis/YouTube-Agency★ 15same name
- berkayburakk/tubecrew★ 2same name
- giacomo-ciro/skills★ 1same name
- maciekuc94/sensum-ai-pipeline★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- find-ideasSkill
- edit-videoSkill
- adaptive-glassSkill
- breakout-cardSkill
- motion-effectsSkill
- paper-gridSkill
- product-motion-adsSkill
- text-over-footageSkill
- publish-and-analyzeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Write for reach first. The first three seconds stop the scroll, the body keeps the viewer and the ending earns a save, share or comment.
- Very specific: line 15
Read the creator's voice and facts before writing: .favstash-studio/preferences.md when the pack's setup created it, plus any brief or …
- Distinctive: line 33
Write, before any hook:
- Distinctive: line 47
Write one opening, or several when the creator wants to test hooks.
- Distinctive: line 52
The copy rule: When adapting a proven original, Opening A is its opening, copied.
- Distinctive: line 59
Every extra opening uses a different hook lever and must be at least as aggressive as A.
- Distinctive: line 82
Every opening flows into the same body:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Short-form scripting
Write for reach first. The first three seconds stop the scroll, the body keeps the viewer and the ending earns a save, share or comment. Hype, FOMO, reverse psychology and bold claims are welcome. Truth is the hard line: real numbers, real names and nothing invented about the creator.
Start from what exists
- Read the creator's voice and facts before writing:
.favstash-studio/preferences.mdwhen the pack's setup created it, plus any brief or notes. If voice notes are missing, learn from transcripts of their recent videos or ask two short questions: who the video is for, and how they talk. Never invent the creator's background, results, customers, experiences or product capabilities. - Resolve the angle, the reel's job (reach, saves, comments/leads or a product action), platform and length. Default to an Instagram Reel of about 30 seconds. Note whether it is spoken to camera or text over footage.
- Get the reference's actual words: a supplied transcript, a saved item's
transcript and on-screen text through FavStash, or an analysis copy from
edit-video's reference helper. A transcript alone does not show the edit; note the first frame, proof and pacing when the visual treatment matters. - Know how strong the reference is.
find-ideasdecides whether it is proven (at least 3× its creator's median views) or only a format reference, and records the evidence. Saved content is taste and structure, not factual proof.
Lock one viewer
Write, before any hook:
Viewer: [one specific person, sharp enough to think "that's me"]
Wants: [the result, understanding or feeling]
Fears: [the cost, time, risk or shared frustration]
Creator's link: [one true line connecting the creator's experience to theirs]Describe the problem in the viewer's own words, not industry language. A personal story can connect through recognition instead of advice.
Write the openings
Write one opening, or several when the creator wants to test hooks. Each opening is filmed on its own and joins the same body, so every one becomes a separate variant to post and compare. Two to four is a practical test; more is fine when the creator wants it.
The copy rule. When adapting a proven original, Opening A is its opening, copied. Keep the words, rhythm, energy, second line and open loop. Change only what would be false from this creator: their numbers, personal claims, product names and features this creator's thing does not have. Never reuse the original's footage, graphics, voice or identity. If the original hook looks weak, say so and still deliver it as A.
Every extra opening uses a different hook lever and must be at least as aggressive as A. A calmer variant is a downgrade. For an original idea, every opening should read as scroll-stopping as a copied hook.
Build each opening as one unit of about five seconds:
- Hook: emotion, not information. One person, something they care about and a question they need answered.
- Super hook: a reason to listen, such as a real number, star count, adoption figure or checkable attribution.
- Open loop: foreshadow the payoff ("And the crazy part is…"). Test it: does the viewer ask "wait, what?" or "wait, why?" within three seconds? Rewrite closed openers like "Here's how to…" or "5 tools that…".
Layer the spoken line, first frame, on-screen text and caption so each adds something different. Verify every number in a hook and keep it. A material caveat goes in the body or caption, never in the hook. For each opening, record the spoken words, the first visual or proof and its seam into the shared body. The openings are production inputs, for example one Trial Reel each, not a shortlist to collapse into one.
Write one shared body
Every opening flows into the same body:
- Click confirmation: prove the promise immediately with a visible result.
- Value: each beat adds something new for the locked viewer.
- Second conflict: new information raises the stakes. Escalate; don't just delay with "stay tuned".
- Payoff: answer what every opening promised.
- Earned ending: a CTA only when the reel's job needs one.
Re-hook after every two or three sentences of value: "It gets worse." "But here's what's insane." "That's not even the best part." A real limitation can become one: "One catch." A body that states facts in an even tone is a slide, not a wave.
Make it work muted: key claims appear on screen, and every important line has a real action, capture or clearly labeled illustration. Estimate 2.5–3 spoken words per second plus pauses. A 15-second reel can be hook, proof and payoff.
For a comment-to-DM gate, gate a free, useful resource such as a repository, prompt, template or guide, not a bare product link. Use one keyword that names the resource, say it once at the end and repeat it on the caption's first line. Offer only automation the creator has set up. A personal reflection can end on a real question, or on nothing at all; don't force a tutorial or resource into it.
Attack it once, rewrite once
Review every opening and the shared body with six lenses. Record the one or two strongest objections for each lens:
| Lens | Asks |
| Skeptic | Why would anyone care? What is new? |
| Expert | Is a claim, name, number or version wrong? |
| Scroller | Muted, does it still land? Would the viewer stop at second three? Does each beat add value? Is there a save moment and a share moment? |
| Competitor | Could any creator post this? What only this creator can say? |
| Hater | What will comments call fake, sponsored, obvious or cringe? |
| Editor | What can go without losing meaning? First drafts usually lose 20%. |
Rewrite once to fix the serious objections, then stop. Reviewers make hooks more scroll-stopping, never calmer; only a factual error changes a copied hook.
Then read it aloud in the creator's voice. Keep their personality: excitement, humour, swearing and honest uncertainty. Cut empty setup ("Here's the thing", "let's dive in"), vague promises without a fact behind them and repetition. Hype words stay when a real fact sits next to them.
Hand the editor a filmable brief
Save analysis/reel-brief.md in the edit run. With edit-video installed, its
new-edit helper creates the run; otherwise save it beside the footage.
Viewer / promise:
Reference: URL, evidence level (proven with baseline | format reference | original)
Opening A (lever): spoken words only
First visual / proof / seam:
Further openings (B, C, …): same fields, each with its lever
Shared body: spoken words only, including any CTA
Timing: words and estimated seconds for each opening plus the body
Must keep: approved claims, caveats, keyword, attributions
Proof map: beat → what the viewer must see → source or capture → owner → fallback
Recording notes: each opening as its own take, then the body, then the CTA againScripting owns the words, promise, proof needs and overall feel. The editor
chooses takes, layouts, style, crops, motion, captions and sound after seeing
the footage, so suggest rather than prescribe shots. Then use $edit-video for
the edit. A finished script does not authorize filming
schedules, uploads or publishing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

