method
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
The squad's shared working method — design principles, the brief file every phase writes once and passes by path, the one-line decision log, token rules, and output caps. Loaded once per phase by the orchestrator; agents follow it without reloading.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dimsedra/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- dimsedra/skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- stack-conventionsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 50
Mechanical work runs in the background: Start tester with run_in_background and collect it at consolidation.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Squad method
Load this once at the start of a phase. Agents get the relevant parts inside their brief; they do not reload it.
Principles (how the squad works)
- Shape before polish. Settle the one idea, the user outcome, and the smallest correct model of the change first. Polish (naming, style, docs) is the last pass.
- Ask the review questions before designing. Who is this for? What changes for them? Does this need a new name, or can it stay invisible inside what exists?
- Never start from nothing. Anchor every design to real paths in this repo. Name the file and function you will extend before proposing new ones.
- Go wide, then decide. For any real fork, put 2 or 3 directions side by side, mark the winner, and say why in one line. The plan doubles as the decision log.
- Restraint is taste. You can build anything, so cut whatever does not serve the outcome. Fewer files, fewer agents, fewer words.
- Every claim has a source. A finding has
path:line. A pass/fail has command output. A number has where it came from, or it goes. - Run the checks; do not claim them. Verification is executed, with output pasted, before anything is called done.
Autonomy
Make routine creative and technical calls yourself. Log each one as a single line under Decisions in the phase output: - <call made> — <why, 10 words>. Stop and ask only for: missing rights (external services, secrets), unsafe or destructive actions, or an ambiguity that changes the goal.
The brief (write once, pass by path)
Before fanning out, write ONE file, squad-brief.md, to your scratchpad directory (fall back to /tmp/squad-brief.md). Pass its absolute path to every agent plus a 3-line summary of what that agent must do. Never paste the diff or the design into N delegation prompts; each paste is paid again in your own context.
# Brief — <phase> — <one-line task>
## Stack
<languages, frameworks, key dirs, exact verify commands, house rules from CLAUDE.md>
## Scope
<files/areas touched; for verify: `git diff --stat` and the diff itself, or a path to it>
## Design / ownership (implement only)
<agreed approach; owned paths per writer>
## Acceptance criteria (when they exist)
## Decisions
- ...Agents: if a brief path is given, read it and skip stack detection and skill loading. Only re-detect when there is no brief.
Token rules
- Skip a lens before you shrink one. The cheapest agent is the one not dispatched.
- Stack signals come from the command's injected context (manifests,
CLAUDE.md), not from an opus dispatch. Dispatchtech-leadfor design, never for detection alone. - Classification-only work runs on a cheaper model. Pass the Agent tool's
modeloverride (sonnet, orhaikufor mechanical tasks) when the task is sorting, listing, or running commands. - Continue, don't re-dispatch. To send a follow-up to an agent that already has the context (a failing check back to its writer, a question to a reviewer), continue that same agent instead of starting a fresh one that re-reads the repo.
- Mechanical work runs in the background. Start
testerwithrun_in_backgroundand collect it at consolidation; review lenses run meanwhile. - Summaries back, never code dumps. Each agent returns at most ~300 words or 10 ranked items unless the orchestrator asks for more.
- Agents have
maxTurns. A partial return is a signal to narrow the ask, not to raise the cap.
Output caps (what each agent returns)
| Agent | Returns |
| tech-lead | stack report (≤ 12 lines), recommended approach, ordered build list, ≤ 3 risks |
| product-owner | one-line scope, ≤ 6 stories, ≤ 10 acceptance criteria, cut list |
| frontend-dev / backend-dev | diff plan as a table (file, change, why), ≤ 3 risks; in writer mode the verify output |
| qa | test plan table, ≤ 12 cases; in writer mode the run output |
| tester | check table, PASS/FAIL per command, failing lines only |
| security-owasp | ≤ 8 findings, each with severity, path:line, attack path, fix; or "clean" |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

