agentleFS
alexjudaalexjuda/alexjuda-skills/skills/design-docs/SKILL.md

design-docs

Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Guide for writing effective software design documents — covers structure, good practices, what to include/exclude, and common mistakes

8 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write for reviewers and future devs, not yourself

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Update or delete stale docs

    line 32

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Essential sections

Problem Statement — Why are we doing this? Who experiences it? What's the impact?

Scope — In and out of scope. Explicit boundaries prevent creep.

Architecture — Components, relationships, data flow. ASCII/Mermaid diagrams work well in Markdown.

API Contracts — Wire formats, protocols, data models. What reviewers need to evaluate the interface.

Alternatives — What else was considered and why it was rejected. Shows you've thought it through.

Security & Performance — Auth model, data sensitivity, latency, scale expectations.

What to include vs. exclude

Include: API schemas, message formats, data models, protocol choices.

Exclude: file names, directory structure, class names, function signatures, DB schemas, config formats.

Good practices

  • Be concise. Keep high signal-to-noise ratio. Avoid repeated information. One, good sentence is better than 10 verbose ones.
  • Write for reviewers and future devs, not yourself
  • One-page for quick review, link deep-dives
  • Update or delete stale docs

Common mistakes

  • Skipping the "why" (jumping to solutions)
  • No alternatives considered
  • Implementation details (file structure, class names)
  • Vague requirements

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.