agentleFS
alexanderpinoalexanderpino/skills/physically-based-rendering/SKILL.md

physically-based-rendering

Skill1 starsChanged 59 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Expert knowledge of physically based rendering (PBR) and photorealistic image synthesis across both offline path tracing and real-time rasterization. Covers the rendering equation, microfacet BRDF theory (GGX, Smith, Fresnel/Schlick/F82), diffuse and sheen models, energy conservation, and production material models (Cook-Torrance, Disney Principled, glTF 2.0 metallic-roughness, Unreal/Unity, Autodesk Standard Surface, OpenPBR 1.1.1), plus material/node graphs (MaterialX), shader implementation (HLSL/GLSL), image-based lighting and split-sum, importance sampling, baked LUTs/curve atlases, volumes and subsurface scattering, texture authoring, color management, scene integration, and debugging. Use whenever the task involves PBR, photorealistic or physically based rendering, BRDF/BSDF math, surface shaders, path or ray tracers, material authoring, OpenPBR, Disney Principled, glTF materials, MaterialX or material graphs, IBL, GGX, Fresnel, curve atlases or baked LUTs, roughness or metalness, or subsurface scattering — even if "PBR" is never said.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.