cross-checking
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Cross-references a specific topic, concept, or rule across all files to verify it is used consistently. Use when checking if a term or claim matches its authoritative definition everywhere, or when user says "cross-check", "is this consistent", "verify this term", or "does this match everywhere". Does NOT audit entire directories — use /auditing-physics or /auditing-canon for that.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditing-canonSkill
- auditing-human-assumptionsSkill
- auditing-physicsSkill
- canon-rulesSkill
- compiling-entitiesSkill
- deep-readingSkill
- deriving-social-systemsSkill
- designing-loreSkill
- designing-worldsSkill
- extracting-entitiesSkill
- integrating-researchSkill
- interrogating-designSkill
- planning-worldbuildingSkill
- researching-papersSkill
- verifying-completionSkill
- writing-scienceSkill
- writing-styleSkill
- writing-worldbuildingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Verify that a specific topic or rule is used consistently across the repo.
- Distinctive: line 33
Does NOT audit entire directories (use /auditing-physics or /auditing-canon).
- Distinctive: line 34
Does NOT write or modify files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cross-Checking
Verify that a specific topic or rule is used consistently across the repo.
Process
- Find the authoritative source for the term/rule
grep -rto find all mentions across the repo- Compare each mention against the authoritative definition
- Report matches, additions, and contradictions
Rules
- Cross-civilization differences are NOT contradictions
- In-universe documents may intentionally differ from science documents
- Different eras may have different understandings
Out of Scope
Does NOT audit entire directories (use /auditing-physics or /auditing-canon). Does NOT write or modify files. Report only.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.