apply
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Paste a JD to get full analysis + tailored resume + cover letter. Argument: [paste JD text here]
25 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- priyansh1210/shirotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- matthewwong525/WongStacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- galiprandi/job-seekertheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- hiddenjobs/job-search-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ChadPapineau/espn-fantasy-football-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ankul5/internship-hunt-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use track, hunt and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
theYahiaSkilltrack
Отследить посылку Почты России
Also in 4 projects that use this
ninehillsSkillhunt
Finds root cause before applying fixes for errors, crashes, regressions, failing tests, broken behavior, and screenshot-reported defects. Use when users report in any language errors, crashes, broken behavior, regressions, failing tests, screenshot evidence, or something that used to work and now fails. Not for code review or new features.
Also in 3 projects that use this
kstonekuanSkillDaily
Documentation and capabilities reference for Daily
Also in 3 projects that use this
julienamorganSkillprofile
Researches the user's market, competitors, and competitive positioning to build a complete ICP profile. Shows findings for user approval before proceeding. Triggers: /profile, "research my market", "who are my competitors". Reads: ./gtm/company.md, ./gtm/icp.md. Writes: updates ./gtm/icp.md with competitive positioning. Standalone: yes (asks for domain if company.md missing).
Also in 3 projects that use this
genomewalkerSkillexplore
RLM-style recursive memory exploration - dynamically navigate the memory graph
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillinterview-prep
Create structured interview plans with competency-based questions and scorecards. Trigger with "interview plan for", "interview questions for", "how should we interview", "scorecard for", or when the user is preparing to interview candidates.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions25 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- andrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin★ 501same name
- andrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin-do-not-fork-currently-updating-v2-★ 500same name
- proficientlyjobs/proficiently-claude-skills★ 389same name
- galiprandi/job-seeker★ 120same name
- hiddenjobs/job-search-mcp★ 25same name
- 1carusalwayswa/apply★ 18same name
- kirkchen/beat★ 9same name
- iliasedelkin/jobissimo★ 8same name
- matthewwong525/WongStack★ 7same name
- qbeka/jev-job-search★ 5same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- evaluateSkill
- followupSkill
- generic-letterSkill
- humanizerSkill
- interviewSkill
- outreachSkill
- patternsSkill
- resume-customizerSkill
- salary-negotiateSkill
- track-applicationSkill
- update-memorySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Read the evaluation framework first:
- Distinctive: line 17
Run a rapid version of the 7-block evaluation.
- Distinctive: line 19
If score >= 2.5, show the score summary and continue to Step 1.
- Distinctive: line 23
Read these before generating anything:
- Distinctive: line 72
AI Companies: verify the AI / side-projects section position.
- Distinctive: line 73
Consumer Scale: verify the headline scale metric + best growth multiplier are prominent.
- Distinctive: line 74
Enterprise / B2B: verify Fortune 500 / partnership content sits inside role bullets (NOT a standalone section).
- Distinctive: line 75
Fintech: consider promoting the GMV / TPV / payments bullet earlier in its role section.
- Distinctive: line 76
Telco: consider promoting telco-partnership work to the lead bullet.
- Distinctive: line 84
No special characters (use ISO currency codes.
- Very specific: line 88
Only use verified metrics that exist in the canonical and YOUR_PROFILE.md's verified-metrics tables
- Distinctive: line 102
NO passive phrases: never use "I would welcome", "Please feel free", "I am open to"
- Very specific: line 118
Never invent a metric — use only verified numbers from the story bank and YOUR_PROFILE.md.
- Distinctive: line 128
If the form has no behavioral questions, skip this step silently.
- Distinctive: line 132
After generating both files, output:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
You are generating job application materials. The user has pasted a job description. Follow this exact workflow.
OUTPUT LOCATION (mandatory): every generated document — the tailored resume and the cover letter — is saved into the git-ignored ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/output/ directory. These files carry the user's real name, history, and target company; output/ is git-ignored so they never reach a public repo. Never save a generated resume/cover letter to the repo root.
STEP 0: Quick evaluation (go/no-go check)
Read the evaluation framework first:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/evaluation-framework.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/story-bank-index.md
Run a rapid version of the 7-block evaluation. Score all 6 dimensions (1-5). If average score < 2.5, warn the user: "This JD scores [X.X/5] — below the GO threshold. Key concerns: [list]. Do you want to proceed anyway?" Wait for confirmation before continuing.
If score >= 2.5, show the score summary and continue to Step 1.
STEP 1: Read the skill files
Read these before generating anything:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/SKILL.md— resume templates, ATS rules, pre-generation checklist, cover letter spec${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/humanizer/SKILL.md— AI writing pattern removal${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/YOUR_PROFILE.md— the user's verified background
Also read these if relevant to the role:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/detailed-context.md— full work history, certifications, AI projects${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/career-tools.md— cover letter hooks, company-specific strategies
STEP 2: Analyze the JD
Output a JD analysis block:
JD ANALYSIS
Company: [name]
Role: [title]
Company Type: [AI / Consumer / Enterprise / Fintech / Telco / Other]
Top 3 Must-Haves:
1. [requirement]
2. [requirement]
3. [requirement]
ATS Keywords to Mirror:
[list 8-10 keywords directly from the JD]
Fit Score: [X/10]
Strengths: [what matches perfectly]
Gaps: [what to address or de-emphasize]
Strategy: [which company-type template to apply and why]STEP 3: Complete the pre-generation checklist
Work through ALL steps of the pre-generation checklist from SKILL.md (Step 0 through Step 9) before generating any document. Do not skip. Step 0 — Locate Your Canonical Resume — is BLOCKING and must complete before Step 4.
STEP 4: Generate the resume from the user's canonical (NOT from templates)
This is BLOCKING. Per SKILL.md STEP 0 — once the user has a canonical generic resume on disk, the tailored resume MUST be built by copying that canonical and applying minimal targeted edits. NEVER rebuild from detailed-context.md, star-stories.md, or this skill's templates. (Only if no canonical exists yet — a fresh install — generate from the templates with an explicit warning, then save the approved result as the canonical, per SKILL.md STEP 0.)
Procedure:
- Copy the canonical (default path
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/generic-resume.docx, or the user's override path perSKILL.mdSTEP 0) to the target${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/output/{{LastName}}_{{FirstName}}_Resume_{{Company}}.docx. - Apply company-type-specific tilts as targeted edits ON the canonical copy:
- AI Companies: verify the AI / side-projects section position; consider promoting a shipped-AI bullet to first in the current role; portfolio link prominent in header.
- Consumer Scale: verify the headline scale metric + best growth multiplier are prominent.
- Enterprise / B2B: verify Fortune 500 / partnership content sits inside role bullets (NOT a standalone section).
- Fintech: consider promoting the GMV / TPV / payments bullet earlier in its role section.
- Telco: consider promoting telco-partnership work to the lead bullet; explicit category match in the cover letter.
- Growth roles: promote the activation / retention bullet to first in the current role.
- Diff against the canonical (
unzip -pboth files'word/document.xmlanddiff) to SURFACE unexpected drops, then render the edited.docxto PDF and look at it to confirm 2 pages, section order, and clickable hyperlinks. The diff flags candidates; the render is what actually proves layout and links survived.
Rules that are never optional (verified against the canonical, not regenerated):
- Exactly 2 pages
- Bullets stay close to canonical lengths (40-55 words for senior bullets, 12-20 for early career)
- No special characters (use ISO currency codes; "to" not arrow; standard hyphens only)
- LinkedIn and portfolio as clickable hyperlinks
- Strongest credential in summary
- Current end dates and availability tags preserved exactly as the canonical has them (do NOT regress a real end date to "Present")
- Only use verified metrics that exist in the canonical and
YOUR_PROFILE.md's verified-metrics tables
Save the resume as a .docx file into the output directory: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/output/{{LastName}}_{{FirstName}}_Resume_{{Company}}.docx
STEP 5: Generate the cover letter
250-300 words. Follow the cover letter specification in SKILL.md exactly:
- Hook: strong, specific, NOT passive ("I am exploring..." is forbidden)
- Strongest credential mentioned in opening paragraph
- Specific ownership language
- Research hook: reference something specific about the company (news, product, initiative)
- Proof points mapped to JD requirements
- Confident close WITH phone number ("Let's connect — {{phone}}")
- NO passive phrases: never use "I would welcome", "Please feel free", "I am open to"
Save as: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/output/{{LastName}}_{{FirstName}}_CoverLetter_{{Company}}.docx
STEP 6: Apply humanizer
Re-read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/humanizer/SKILL.md and apply the checklist to ALL generated text in both documents before finalizing. Remove any AI-sounding patterns that slipped through. The humanizer pass is mandatory, not optional.
STEP 6.5: ATS screening questions (only if the application form has them)
Many ATS forms ask inline behavioral / screening questions ("Tell us about a time you led through ambiguity", "Why this company?", "Describe a product you scaled"). If the user pasted such questions, or the application clearly has them, map each to the story bank instead of improvising.
For each question:
- Pick the best-fit STAR story from
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/resume-customizer/references/story-bank-index.md(already loaded in STEP 0) — match on the company TYPE row and the question's theme (scale, ambiguity, conflict, failure, data integrity, partnership). - Draft a tight answer in the user's voice (apply the humanizer checklist): situation in one line, action in their words, the quantified result. Keep to the form's word/char limit if one is given.
- Never invent a metric — use only verified numbers from the story bank and
YOUR_PROFILE.md.
Output each as:
Q: [the screening question]
Story: [story name (#n) from index]
Answer: [drafted response]If the form has no behavioral questions, skip this step silently.
STEP 7: Output summary
After generating both files, output:
GENERATION SUMMARY
Pre-Generation Checklist: COMPLETED
Company Type Strategy Applied: [type]
ATS Keywords Mirrored: [list]
Customizations Made:
- [what was reordered/emphasized]
- [which company-type template used]
- [any special sections added/removed]
Files Generated (in the git-ignored output/ directory):
- output/{{LastName}}_{{FirstName}}_Resume_{{Company}}.docx
- output/{{LastName}}_{{FirstName}}_CoverLetter_{{Company}}.docx
EVALUATION SCORE: [X.X/5] — [GO/CAUTION/SKIP]
INTERVIEW PREP QUICK HITS:
Top 3 STAR stories for this company (from story-bank-index.md):
1. [story name + why relevant]
2. [story name + why relevant]
3. [story name + why relevant]
Questions they will likely ask:
- [question 1]
- [question 2]
- [question 3]Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

