agentleFS
akashgitakashgit/remote-factory/skills/pipeline-subagents/SKILL.md

pipeline-subagents

Skill74 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design and execute a custom multi-agent pipeline using Claude Code subagents directly. Spawns researcher, builder, etc. via the Agent tool with native parallel and background execution. Use when the user says 'run a pipeline for X' and factory subagents are available.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. boston-harness-group/remote-factory★ 74100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Write .factory/pipeline/summary.md with goal, status, step results, and key findings.

    line 126

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Pipeline (Subagents) — Dynamic Multi-Agent Orchestrator

You design and execute custom multi-agent pipelines using Claude Code's native Agent tool to spawn factory subagents directly.

The user wants: $ARGUMENTS

Setup

mkdir -p .factory/pipeline

Your Agents

Spawn specialists using the Agent tool with the plugin-namespaced subagent type factory:<role>:

Agent({
  description: "<short description>",
  prompt: "<detailed task>",
  subagent_type: "factory:<role>"
})
Subagent TypePurpose
factory:researcherWeb research, codebase analysis, domain studies
factory:strategistGenerate prioritized hypotheses from observations
factory:builderImplement code changes on a feature branch, open PRs
factory:qaHealth checks, code review, adversarial QA verification
factory:archivistRecord findings to .factory/archive/
factory:distillerRefine vague ideas into buildable specs

Also available: factory:failure_analyst (classify experiment failures by root cause — use when analyzing why a prior experiment failed).

Parallel Execution

Issue multiple Agent tool calls in the same message — they run concurrently:

Agent({ subagent_type: "factory:researcher", prompt: "Research the auth bug..." })
Agent({ subagent_type: "factory:qa", prompt: "Run baseline eval..." })

This is concurrent execution via parallel tool calls, not shell backgrounding. Each Agent call is still individually synchronous.

Background Execution

For non-blocking steps (e.g., archival):

Agent({ subagent_type: "factory:archivist", prompt: "Archive findings...", run_in_background: true })

Phase 1: Design the Pipeline

  1. Understand the goal — what outcome is desired? Which agents are needed?
  2. Inspect project state (use Bash tool):
    ls .factory/config.json 2>/dev/null && cat .factory/config.json
  3. Write the pipeline plan to .factory/pipeline/plan.md:
## Pipeline: <goal summary>

### Steps

| Step | Role | Task Summary | Depends On |
|------|------|-------------|-----------|
| S1 | researcher | ... | - |
| S2 | qa | ... | - |
| S3 | strategist | ... | S1, S2 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Gate Rules
- After S1: PROCEED if ...; REDIRECT if ...
- After S3: PROCEED if ...; ABORT if ...

Design Principles

  • Minimize invocations — only agents needed for this goal
  • Maximize parallelism — steps whose dependencies are all satisfied and that don't depend on each other can be spawned in the same message
  • Mandatory archival — always include at least one archivist step at the end
  • Gate rules — define PROCEED/REDIRECT/ABORT criteria for critical transitions

Phase 2: Execute the Pipeline

Process steps in topological order:

  1. Identify next batch — steps whose dependencies are all complete
  2. Build prompts — incorporate output from prior steps (agent results are returned directly)
  3. Emit start event and invoke agents:
    factory emit agent.started --agent <role> --project "$(pwd)"
    Then invoke via Agent tool (single, parallel batch, or background for archival).
  4. Read results — Agent tool returns subagent output directly
  5. Persist review and emit completion:
    mkdir -p .factory/reviews
    factory emit agent.completed --agent <role> --project "$(pwd)"
    Then use the Write tool to save the agent output to .factory/reviews/<role>-latest.md
  6. Apply gate rule:
    • PROCEED: Move to next step
    • REDIRECT: Re-invoke with corrections (max 2 per step)
    • ABORT: Skip downstream steps, jump to summary
  7. Repeat until done

Error Recovery

  • Agent error: retry once with simpler prompt
  • 2 consecutive failures: ABORT pipeline

Final Summary

Write .factory/pipeline/summary.md with goal, status, step results, and key findings.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.