claim-verification
Skill0 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub
Check factual claims about external software against the version actually installed before stating them, and label every claim as verified, inferred, or recalled. Covers API signatures, function or method names, CLI flags and subcommands, config keys, env vars, default values, library behavior, deprecations, and version numbers. Use whenever you are about to tell the user how a library, tool, CLI, framework, or service works, write code that calls an API you have not opened in this session, answer "does X support Y" or "what's the flag for Z", or recommend a version or upgrade, even if the claim feels obvious. Recalled API details are the most common source of confident wrong answers. Not for claims about your own work's state (tests pass, bug fixed), which need a run of the verification command instead.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- GSA-TTS/devCrew_s1their own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Starlight-Intelligence/starlight-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mtarcure/claude-vibe-squadtheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- Tsurai7/agentic-playbooktheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- sivaguru-2113/Agent-personatheir own version, first seen Aug 18, 2026
- jack1415926/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 14, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- mtarcure/claude-vibe-squad★ 220same name
- GSA-TTS/devCrew_s1★ 51same name
- frankxai/starlight-agent-skills★ 1same name
- sivaguru-2113/Agent-persona★ 1same name
- Starlight-Intelligence/starlight-agent-skills★ 1same name
- jack1415926/claude-skills★ 0same name
- Tsurai7/agentic-playbook★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Check before stating anything the user will act on that names a specific:
- Distinctive: line 44
Latest docs or memory: Use these last, and say they are unpinned.
- Distinctive: line 46
If the installed version and your memory disagree, the installed version wins.
- Distinctive: line 52
When an answer contains specific claims, mark how you know each one.
- Distinctive: line 69
Before writing a call to an API you haven't opened this session, look up its signature first.
- Distinctive: line 77
No shell, the package isn't installed, or the docs are unreachable: say the claim is recalled.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Claim verification
Training memory describes some version of a library, often a blend of several. The user's project runs one specific version. Most hallucinated APIs fall in the gap between the two: a renamed kwarg, a flag added in a later minor release, a default that changed, a function that moved modules. This skill closes that gap cheaply. Most checks take one command.
When a claim needs checking
Check before stating anything the user will act on that names a specific:
- function, method, class, or import path
- parameter or keyword name, its type, or its default
- CLI flag, subcommand, or exit code
- config key, env var, or file location
- version number, a "since vX", or "deprecated in vX"
- behavior claim ("X retries by default", "Y is thread-safe")
Skip checking for general concepts ("Postgres supports transactions") and for code you have already opened in this session.
Where the truth is, in order of authority
- The installed artifact itself. It's the version that will actually run.
- CLI:
<tool> --help,<tool> <sub> --help,man <tool>,<tool> --version - Python:
python -c "import pkg, inspect; print(pkg.__version__); print(inspect.signature(pkg.fn))", or read the source atpython -c "import pkg; print(pkg.__file__)" - Node:
node_modules/<pkg>/package.json(version), its.d.tstypes (signatures), andnode -e "console.log(Object.keys(require('<pkg>')))" - Go:
go doc <pkg>.<Symbol>. Rust: the source under~/.cargo/registry/src/ - Anything: grep the installed source for the symbol
- CLI:
- The lockfile or manifest, to find which version the project pins when
nothing is installed yet (
package-lock.json,uv.lock,poetry.lock,Cargo.lock,go.sum) - Docs pinned to that version, such as versioned docs URLs, the tagged README, or the CHANGELOG entries between the version you recall and the pinned one
- Latest docs or memory. Use these last, and say they are unpinned.
If the installed version and your memory disagree, the installed version wins. Tell the user about the mismatch, because they may be reading the same outdated docs.
Label what you say
When an answer contains specific claims, mark how you know each one. Use plain words, not a badge on every sentence:
- verified means you checked it this session against the installed
version or a source you ran. Show what you ran when it's useful
("
rg --helpon 14.1 lists--pcre2"). - inferred means it follows from something verified but you didn't test it directly. Say what it was inferred from.
- recalled means it came from memory and wasn't checked. Say so, and give the one command that would check it if you can't run it yourself.
One sentence like "I checked these against requests 2.31 installed here; the retry default is from memory" is enough. The point is that the user can tell which claims are solid and which still need checking.
Writing code against an API
Before writing a call to an API you haven't opened this session, look up its
signature first. That takes one command. Debugging a wrong kwarg costs a test run and a
confused user. If the call compiles or imports cleanly in a quick check
(python -c "from x import y", tsc --noEmit, go vet), that is
verification. Say that you ran it.
When you can't check
No shell, the package isn't installed, or the docs are unreachable: say the claim is recalled. Name the version you believe it applies to, and give the user the exact command to confirm it. Don't hedge everything into mush. Be specific about which part is uncertain.
Example
User: "how do I set a timeout on httpx requests?"
Weak: "Pass timeout=10 to httpx.get." This is recalled and unlabeled.
Strong: runs python -c "import httpx, inspect; print(httpx.__version__); print(inspect.signature(httpx.get))",
sees 0.27.0 and timeout: 'TimeoutTypes' = Timeout(timeout=5.0), then answers:
"httpx.get(url, timeout=10). Verified against httpx 0.27 installed here.
The default is 5 seconds, not unlimited like requests. For separate connect and read
limits, use httpx.Timeout(10, connect=2). I recalled that form; it's in
the same signature's Timeout class if you want to check."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

