agentleFS
ajstars1ajstars1/startup-coach/jtbd/SKILL.md

jtbd

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Jobs to be Done + Market Definition — define your market as "a group of people + the job they're trying to get done", write customer job statements, map job steps, and derive outcome statements (customer success criteria). Use after choosing a market opportunity, when segmenting customers, or when a founder describes their market as a product category instead of a customer job.

10 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    The customer is not you: Don't assume they already know the problem you want to solve or the product you haven't built.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    Do the outcome statements connect to the pains/gains in /value-proposition-canvas?

    line 31
  3. Very specific:

    Every job statement, step, and outcome drafted before interviews is [ASSUMPTION] — end with which ones the founder should rank-test with …

    line 32

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Jobs to be Done (JTBD) + Market Definition

Credits: JTBD theory — Clayton Christensen. Job statements / job maps / outcome statements — Tony Ulwick's Outcome-Driven Innovation. Customer-segment discipline — Steve Blank.

Core definition: a market is a group of people and the job they are trying to get done. Not a product category, not a demographic. People don't want a quarter-inch drill; they hire products to make progress in a circumstance.

Job Statement — the three pitfalls (check every statement against all three)

  1. Your words, not the customer's. You may use specialist jargon; the customer doesn't. Ask: "would a customer use these words to describe their needs / outcomes / experience?"
  2. The customer is not you. Don't assume they already know the problem you want to solve or the product you haven't built. The job statement reflects the customer's current knowledge and awareness.
  3. Describe the situation, not your solution. The customer has a bigger perspective; your (future) product merely has a role in it. "Get my stitching done without leaving the house" — not "use my booking app".

Form: verb + object + context ("reach the airport on time from home", not "use my taxi app").

The sequence

  1. Segment by job, not demographics — people sharing the same job + circumstances. Identify 2–4 archetypes within the chosen segment.
  2. Focus Job — the one job statement you're building around, for the chosen archetype.
  3. Job Steps — the customer's process to get the job done end-to-end (their map, today, without you). Each step is a place where they measure success.
  4. Outcome Statements — how the customer measures success at each step. Form: direction + metric + object + context ("minimize the time it takes to verify the fit before the event"). Draft 5–10; mark each [ASSUMPTION] until customers rank them.
  5. Rank with customers (importance × current satisfaction). Important + unsatisfied = the underserved outcomes worth building for. Rankings by the founder or the AI are placeholders, labeled as such.

Consistency checks

  • Does the market definition (people + job) match the market opportunity chosen in /where-to-play (application + customer)? Flag mismatches.
  • Do the outcome statements connect to the pains/gains in /value-proposition-canvas? They should be the same evidence, different lenses.
  • Every job statement, step, and outcome drafted before interviews is [ASSUMPTION] — end with which ones the founder should rank-test with real customers, and how (/customer-discovery).

Ledger discipline (v2): reference Belief Ledger IDs ([A4], [F7]) for every claim; propose new/changed items in a closing "Ledger delta" section rather than restating claims — restated claims drift.

Fill-in templates: TEMPLATES.md in this skill's folder — copy the structures into your project's discovery/ and fill with labels.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.