cross-reference-linking
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Links current findings to priors, related literature, and correlated data. Use when user mentions "compare to priors", "find prior studies", "correlate with", "longitudinal comparison", or needs historical context.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- public/llms.txtllms.txt
- ai-detection-pipelineSkill
- ai-quality-reviewSkill
- ai-report-assistSkill
- care-gap-closureSkill
- dataset-preprocessingSkill
- dicom-web-querySkill
- followup-trackingSkill
- guideline-integrationSkill
- image-quality-auditSkill
- imaging-referralSkill
- imaging-study-reviewSkill
- llm-radiology-useSkill
- modality-detectionSkill
- model-validationSkill
- pacs-workflowSkill
- patient-education-materialSkill
- patient-results-letterSkill
- radiology-contextSkill
- radiology-dataset-guideSkill
- radiology-metricsSkill
- radiology-report-analysisSkill
- radiology-researchSkill
- report-quality-reviewSkill
- structured-reportingSkill
The file
Files
Cross-Reference Linking Skill
Triggers
- "compare to priors"
- "find prior studies"
- "correlate with"
- "longitudinal comparison"
- "followup from"
- "related findings"
- "pathology correlation"
Parameters
reference_type(required): Type of cross-reference neededprior_studies- Historical imaging comparisonliterature- Relevant published cases or studiesfollowup- Sequential study comparisonmultimodality- Different modality correlationpathology- Radiology-pathology correlationclinical- EHR/clinical data correlation
finding_summary(required): Current finding to cross-referencepatient_id(optional): Patient identifier for prior searchdate_range(optional): Time window for prior search
Cross-Reference Types
Prior Study Comparison
- Modality, date, and key findings of historical studies
- Size/dimension comparisons for measurable findings
- Density/signal intensity comparisons
- Change assessment (stable, improved, progressed)
Literature Correlation
- Similar published cases
- Expected imaging appearances
- Atypical presentations
- Prognostic implications
Pathology Correlation
- Common pathologies for imaging appearance
- Staging implications (TNM, etc.)
- Molecular markers and imaging correlates
- Treatment response patterns
Clinical Correlation
- Lab values relevant to imaging findings
- Symptoms and clinical history
- Treatment history and timeline
Output Format
Returns structured JSON with:
- Prior finding references with dates
- Comparison metrics (size, characteristics)
- Change assessment with confidence
- Recommendations for followup
- Related literature citations
Usage Examples
reference_type: prior_studies
finding_summary: 2.5 cm lung nodule right upper lobe
patient_id: MRN12345
reference_type: pathology
finding_summary: irregular spiculated mass left lower lobe
reference_type: followup
finding_summary: 1.2 cm thyroid nodule compared to 6 months priorData Sources
- PACS for prior imaging studies
- RIS for structured reports
- EHR for clinical correlation
- Literature databases for research correlation
- Pathology system for radiology-pathology correlation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

