code_graph_agentic_observable_coding
AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 32 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Guidance for AI coding agents working on this repository. People should start with README.md.
- Installs packages
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- docs/llms.txtllms.txt
- c4-designSkill
- code-graphSkill
- orchestrate-cycleSkill
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 27
Keep adapters thin: new behaviour goes into GraphService, rules into rules.py, measurements into analytics.py.
- Very specific: line 30
Add a test for every behaviour change.
- Distinctive: line 32
Keep examples generic. The sample project is a notification platform.
- Very specific: line 36
Read .claude/skills/code-graph/SKILL.md.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AGENTS.md
Guidance for AI coding agents working on this repository. People should start with README.md.
What this is
A C4 code graph tool (code_graph_tool/) and an agent layer (.claude/: agents, skills, playbooks) that lets coding agents plan, build and review software against a shared ledger. The graph records C4 nodes, function contracts (CALLS edges), tasks, ADRs, a utility registry and EVAL verdicts, and its policies block unapproved changes.
Setup and checks
cd code_graph_tool
pip install -r requirements.txt # Python 3.10+
python -m pytest -q # must pass
python examples/demo.py # must finish with "check: clean"
python cg.py --db examples/demo.db serve --port 8770 # UI at http://127.0.0.1:8770/ui/Code map
codegraph/domain.py: vocabulary (node types, layers, lifecycle, errors). Extend types here.codegraph/service.py: every use case. The CLI, HTTP API and UI all go throughGraphService.codegraph/rules.py: validation and governance policies (smallPolicyclasses).codegraph/analytics.py: impact, metrics, checks G01–G13, EVAL adherence. Deterministic, no I/O.codegraph/repository.py: SQL only.codegraph/db.py: schema (SQLite, WAL).codegraph/cli.py,codegraph/api.py: thin adapters.ui/: static JS, no build step, vendored Cytoscape.js.tests/test_codegraph.py: the pytest suite.examples/: generic sample seed and demo.
Rules
- Keep adapters thin: new behaviour goes into
GraphService, rules intorules.py, measurements intoanalytics.py. - The CLI uses only the standard library. Output is JSON on stdout; errors are JSON on stderr with exit codes 1 (unexpected), 2 (invalid input or not found) and 3 (policy violation).
fan_in/fan_outare derived from CALLS edges and never stored.- Add a test for every behaviour change; keep the demo ending with a clean
cg check. - Agent definitions and
SKILL.mdfiles stay short (about 20–40 lines); detail goes in.claude/playbooks/andreference/files. - Keep examples generic. The sample project is a notification platform.
- Bundled libraries in
ui/vendor/are third-party; don't edit them (see THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md).
Using the graph as an agent on another project
Read .claude/skills/code-graph/SKILL.md. Coders follow .claude/playbooks/coder.md; reviewers follow .claude/playbooks/reviewer.md. Treat exit code 3 as a stop: propose an ADR and escalate, never work around it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

